I spent a little time comparing my JICO SAS ($133) to my EVG 764-DE ($14) last night.
All indications point to JICO as the manufacturer of the EVG, which has a .3 x .7 mil bonded tip.
I found that the cheap EVG compares very favorably! Compared to the SAS, it actually has fuller mids and more bass, although the low end is not as defined. It is also considerably louder than the SAS, giving it a more energetic, peppy character.
As expected, the SAS provides greater detail, resolution and definition, and has more air on top.
Both styli track beautifully at 1.25g. For some applications, the EVG might actually be preferable to the SAS; I like to use it for records that have limited fidelity or are in poor condition. It's great for old mono records.
I would say that the EVG provides 70-80% of the performance of the SAS, which is astounding considering it costs less than 10% of what the SAS costs!!
Unfortunately I am unable to determine which one sounds the closed to OEM; the Shure stylus that came with my V-15 III was compromised when I received it (so I transferred the 'SUPER TRACK PLUS' stylus guard to the SAS).