• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

JVC X-1 Replacement Cartridge

Uncle Choppy

New Member
Greetings from the lowlands of Arkansas– home of heavy soil, tall grasses and indestructible bugs!

Please help me solve a conundrum pertaining to the X-1 cartridge on my JVC QL-A7 turntable. The stylus is shot. Would it be wiser to replace it with an aftermarket DT-X1? Or, should I abandon the X-1 entirely in favor of a more modern alternative cartridge, such as one of the following: 1) Benz Micro Silver, 2) Audio-Technica AT150SA, 3) Audio-Technica VM750S, 4) Ortofon MC-3 Turbo.

My vinyl collection consists mainly of traditional Irish and Scottish, classic rock, early music (15th, 16th and 17th century, especially Bach, especially organ), and a smattering of composers from the classical, romantic, modern and post modern periods.

As for reproduction qualities, I value an open and spacious soundstage that tends toward warm but is well-defined in terms of instrument separation and clarity.

Any insight would be appreciated.
 
Register to hide this ad
The JVC X-1 cartridge is an unknown to me but I would be inclined towards replacing it with something new for which genuine future stylus replacements are likely to be available. I also can't comment on your individual candidates.

I think "open and spacious soundstage that tends toward warm but is well-defined in terms of instrument separation and clarity" is what most of us want from a cartridge :) However, warm cartridges are often not especially open.

I would probably steer away from AT if warmth is a definite requirement, although I understand that the shibata styli contribute a touch of warmth, but that is just hear-say. The AT-VM95 range is known to be a tad warmer than the average AT cartridge, so perhaps the AT-VM95SH (shibata) should be a candidate, even though it is probably under-budget. To avoid brightness with AT cartridges, you need to keep the load capacitance (from your phono-stage and phono-cables) down to a minimum.

From my own experience, the cartridges that might fit the bill are Denon DL-110 (high-output MC), Nagaoka MP-200, Goldring 2400 (also made by Nagaoka) and Ortofon OM20 (but not Super version). An Ortofon 2M cartridge such as the Blue or Bronze may also be good, as they are open and detailed (but perhaps not warm).
 
It would be difficult to replace the X-1, since it looks to've been an all-out effort. Beryllium cantilever, square-shank nude Shibata, laminated core-- all the goodies of the era. If the stylus is mechanically intact (ie, only the diamond is worn), I would poll the available stylus retippers about the feasibility of replacing the diamond and leaving everything else as-is.
1Capture-a.jpg
 
A picture of the cartridge would help. The description wualta posted sounds suspiciously Audio Technica-ish, and AT & JVC have had dealings in the past.
 
There's a voice in my ear whispering "AT-15SS...AT15SS...AT15SS..." - but just a bit different, like a Canadian Pontiac in the old days versus an American one. Laurentian, Parisian vs. Bonneville?

(Yeah, I know there were more differences than that...)
 
It would be difficult to replace the X-1, since it looks to've been an all-out effort. Beryllium cantilever, square-shank nude Shibata, laminated core-- all the goodies of the era. If the stylus is mechanically intact (ie, only the diamond is worn), I would poll the available stylus retippers about the feasibility of replacing the diamond and leaving everything else as-is.
View attachment 2610865

^ This! If you like the X-1, it’s going to be hard to match it. I would do a re-tip. I have in the past, and I believe Walt could verify that it is not a bad way to get a stylus/cart back in action.
 
Greetings again. Many thanks for your suggestions thus far. The X-1 cartridge is highly regarded and I would like to keep it. As Wualta pointed out, the X1 is practically unique! Replacement styli do not have near the specifications as the original DT-X1. So far the Jico DT-X1/II (E009237) is closest. It has an aluminum cantilever and a Shibata stylus, but the webpage offers no further specifics. Meanwhile, I have ordered an AT150SA just to put the table back into service. It was hard decision; the other three options seemed equally viable, but I do not have the luxury of listening to any of them prior to purchase.
 
Back
Top Bottom