• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Kabuki Vs Tekton

Nyjblbob

Hooked on Horn's and Tubes. Go big or go home
It's funny when someone posts a question about some of the older Japanese speakers
say pioneer Cs99a, and most will consider them Kabuki speakers, due to the multiple mids and tweeters
But take a look at say Tekton Encore speakers. they have 19 drivers in each cabinet.
 
Register to hide this ad
Tekton utilizes a completely different technology in their speaker array vs some thrown together Kabuki design. I've been fortunate to hear some and I can assure you, they are nowhere near what we think of when we say Kabuki speaker.
 
The difference, TO ME, is Japanese kabuki speakers FILL THE FRONT BAFFLE with as many drivers as will fit.
Tekton generally has a far bigger cabinet for the amount of drivers installed. Not to mention probably far better engineering and design.
 
Don't misunderstand my statement or take it as criticism of the brand.
I would love to compare one of their top tier speakers to a pair of my vintage horn systems.
I was really hoping to see Tekton at the Tampa show. same with Zu.
No Klipsch or JBL either.
 
I had a pair of Tektons maybe 15 years ago. They had one 5" full range driver and small port. Wonderful sound. I just went to the Tekton website based on the mention above...OMG! I couldn't even count the number of drivers in each box! I guess Eric had experienced an epiphany of some sort?
 
How 'bout those McIntosh speakers with 40-some drivers? I don't think Kabuki is a fair comparison.
I suspect those are so called point source types?
There's Carver point source speakers, and I believe Dayton also has/had a similar type of speaker system. But I don't consider those kabuki in the traditional sense. EDIT--after reading gordonW's post below perhaps these should be termed line arrays rather than point source.

Kabuki to me is a square or rectangular box with the front baffle loaded with drivers.
It's possible there is more than one interpretation of kabuki...
 
Last edited:
The Tektons are an attempt to simulate a "concentric" driver.

IMHO, they are not quite as coherent or consistent in response at off-axis angles as something like a Tannoy dual-concentric- but the Tektons are quite good, especially considering how much speaker you get for the money. Lot of bang-for-the-buck there. Not my personal favorite (though I don't dislike them), but pretty impressive, nonetheless.

In contrast, speakers with long vertical columns of identical drivers, like the McIntosh towers, Pipe Dreams and such, are basically line-arrays. A cylindrical radiation pattern, as opposed to a spherical radiation from a point source. Great for filling a space with sound at a uniform level and frequency response, but maybe not quite as "pinpoint" from a soundstaging (especially vertical) standpoint, in many cases...

OTOH- so-called "kabuki" speakers, seem to have a very random, uneven dispersion pattern- with frequency response that is VERY dependent on the angle of listening. With the coupling, cancellation and comb-filtering from that many disparate drivers, in that random and asymmetric of a layout, with many of the drivers sharing the same frequency ranges, the sound is literally different in every direction, as opposed to every other direction. Move to one side or the other, or up and down, and the speaker frequently sounds like a completely different speaker!

Regards,
Gordon.
 
Last edited:
I had a pair of Tektons maybe 15 years ago. They had one 5" full range driver and small port. Wonderful sound. I just went to the Tekton website based on the mention above...OMG! I couldn't even count the number of drivers in each box! I guess Eric had experienced an epiphany of some sort?

Eric started out selling full range single driver speakers. Most used Fostex drivers and I have a pair from about 15 years ago which I still enjoy. The epiphany probably started when he switched to the Eminence based guitar speakers in the Lores plus a super tweeter. Same recipe as the Zu speakers.
 
I had a pair of Tektons maybe 15 years ago. They had one 5" full range driver and small port. Wonderful sound. I just went to the Tekton website based on the mention above...OMG! I couldn't even count the number of drivers in each box! I guess Eric had experienced an epiphany of some sort?
I own the Tekton Double Impacts. A very good speaker. When I was shopping for speakers my goal was for the Von Schweikert Endeavor MKIII’s. I had heard them set up in a high end store in the Atlanta area. Loved them. But ultimately just could not do the 8,000 dollar price tag at the time. Did some research and felt the Tektons at 3,000 would fit the bill. They did, and have.
As @GordonW mentions in a previous post, they do have some off axis limitations. I had heard Tekton had done something to address that issue in the model I have.
While on a lot of things the Von Schweikert will beat them, they do enough things well that I am happy based on the money I paid. It will take a lot of dollars to beat them. IMHO
 
Back
Top Bottom