KEF 104/2 – Crossover Rebuild: Myths and (my) Reality
If you are contemplating recapping your KEF 104/2 speakers, DO!
If you're hesitant (KEF put so much efforts to match capacitances and speakers so any change will affect the sound...) or are confused about all the contradictory information (MKP Vs. Electrolytics, ESR values and Capacitance drift...), you're not alone!
After many years of Audio DIY, I did a budget friendly-upgrade recapping of my beloved KEF 104/2 and the result is beyond my expectation.
Background:
I bought a pair of KEF 104/2 mono-wired speakers (1990 build) in 2015. Tweeters were damaged, and bass drivers had rotten suspensions. I replaced all suspensions, repaired the T33 tweeter, added new ferrofluid, and updated the cabinets to mahogany. I skipped recapping the crossover back then.
10 Years Later:
The right speaker sounded muddy. Since the Ferrofluid was only 10 years old, and I decided it was now time for a full crossover recap.
Recap Strategy:
To keep budget low, whilst maximizing impact, I focused on capacitors critical to crossover frequencies:
- Tweeter (C13–C16): Replace with MKP polymer film caps
- Mids (C6, C7, C8, C12): Replace with Electrolytics ; bypass C6+C7 with 2µF film, use film capacitor for C12 low-loss
- Lows (C2, C3): Replace with Electrolytics.
Observations & Myths:
- Ferrofluid: Old ferrofluid really kills clarity, even after "only" 10 years!
Replacing it restored clarity and detail, not only to the failing speaker but to both.
- ESR Values : ESR was very low on all capacitors (max value 0,1 Ohm at 100kHz =~ 0,4 Ohm at 1kHz).
On the KEF104/2 speakers, there is no need to add any resistance in series to the MKPs, since the initial ESR values are very low.
- Capacitance: Capacitance of all capacitors had drifted positively by 8–38% (most between 12-18%), affecting crossover accuracy.
KEF's orginal 2% tolerance on capacitance is no longer valid on these vintage 30+ years speakers.
- Recap Impact:
MKP caps in tweeter further improved clarity, but only slightly, without altering the sound.
Mids and lows saw most dramatic improvement: vocals and instruments became vivid and lifelike.
Aging C6 and C7 constrained the mid-range, despite the low ESR and "only" 15% capacitance drift.
Conclusions & Tips:
- Replace ferrofluid first; redo every ~10 years (~70% of improvement).
- Do, at least, the Essential recap caps: (~25% improvement)
- Lows: C2, C3
- Mids: C6, C7, C8, C12
- Tweeter: C13–C16
- My recommendation: Use high-quality electrolytic caps for >20µF, and film caps for smaller values to maximize clarity (~5% improvement).
No need for additional resistance in series to the MKPs
- Optional: Bypass midrange in-line caps (C6+C7) with 1–2µF film for extra detail. (I did)
- Replacing all other caps can future-proof the speakers. (I did not, yet, but have all capacitors at home)
Result:
After replacing ferrofluid and essential caps, the 104/2s are stunning—warm, detailed, and alive.
Total cost: €134 for both speakers - including ferrofluid.
By far the best investment to revive these legendary speakers.
For those interested I attach a small report with pictures and the list of capacitors.
Wishing you success with your recapping project and a lot of long-lasting enjoyment thereafter!