I have both the KA-4002 and the KA-4006 and in terms of sound quality the 4002 is much much better. It was designed by Nakaichi and Kasuga who left Trio Kenwood shortly thereafter to form Accuphase. They did not design the 4006. Even though the 4006 is rated at 34 wpc vs 18wpc for the 4002 IMO the 4002 is an absolute wonder to listen to. The 4006 is a fine integrated overall but the design of the 4002 makes it something quite special. It has a better damping and slew rate as well. The dynamic burst power of the little 18 wpc is quite astounding. Even though built in 1970-73 it has a "sub out" rca jack! I have compared it to the Rega BRIO, the PS Audio Sprout, the Harmon 330b and several others in an A/B scenario and the 4002 is a clear winner. If you see one grab it and never let it go.Any opinions on the KA-4006? Pros/Cons? Likes/Dislikes? I may be in the market for one at a decent price. Somehow I like solid state amps with no reciever. Would just be enough power to ruffle the blinds in my small house. Thanks ahead of time.
Casey
You might have better luck starting a new thread as opposed to resurrecting's a very old one.I have both the KA-4002 and the KA-4006 and in terms of sound quality the 4002 is much much better. It was designed by Nakaichi and Kasuga who left Trio Kenwood shortly thereafter to form Accuphase. They did not design the 4006. Even though the 4006 is rated at 34 wpc vs 18wpc for the 4002 IMO the 4002 is an absolute wonder to listen to. The 4006 is a fine integrated overall but the design of the 4002 makes it something quite special. It has a better damping and slew rate as well. The dynamic burst power of the little 18 wpc is quite astounding. Even though built in 1970-73 it has a "sub out" rca jack! I have compared it to the Rega BRIO, the PS Audio Sprout, the Harmon 330b and several others in an A/B scenario and the 4002 is a clear winner. If you see one grab it and never let it go.