• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Kenwood KR-4140 Work Observations

Swaler61

New Member
Hey all,

I'm working on a new to me Kenwood KR-4140, and it is in overall pretty good shape, and so far works pretty well and really liking the tone!

For background, I'm a career EE, but haven't worked on a lot of old solid state circuitry, as I'm more of a guitar amp and old radio guy. Some jukebox work thrown in, too.

Meanwhile, some observations...
Overall, I am a fan of replacing electrolytics with films where possible, esp. in the signal path, but for now I'm going to leave this unit as-is since it sounds so good.
  • It's a matter of debate regarding changing out all of the ~53 year-old ecaps, and I'll leave that debate for other threads.
  • Same observation regarding the 2SC458s here, they sound good and are working well, am going to leave them for now.

Whoa, noted a LOT of heat coming off the main heat sink, even when the receiver was sitting idle, and have two observations on that: transistor mounting and incorrect idle current setting.
  • Checked and reset the idle bias current on this unit and it went pretty well. However, the old trimmers used in this are really glitchy. While I have them set in the ballpark, I'm going to try replacing them with multiturn trimmers as an experiment. They are on order.
  • After getting the idle current set at least closer to where it should be, I noted right away that there is a lot less heat generation from the output transistors. Nice.

One thing I noticed on the 2SD155 output transistors: they were mounted dry (no thermal compound), with 4-5 layers of what looked like some kind of plastic insulators, they did not look like mica. I have no idea if these output transistors are original, but interesting that they lasted this long.

For future posterity, and at the risk that this has already been covered elsewhere, I will now interject here with some recommendations on mounting TO packages onto heat sinks. These observations come out of my design work on power transistor and heat management. In general:
  • Before mounting the transistors, make sure the surface where your transistor is mounted is flat as possible to create a clean "mechanical interface" between the TO and the sink. Also check that the surface of the transistor itself is flat, too, they can sometimes have burrs that can pierce the insulator or cause a gap that can keep heat from flowing as well as it could.
  • Whenever possible, always use some thermal compound when mounting to a heat sink. It really helps to get that heat flowing into the heat sink to spread the heat out. Yeah, thermal grease is messy to deal with, but we're not in a production plant working by the hour. Take your time, this is a hobby, right? Don't overdo it, use just enough so that a little pushes out after being tightened.
  • When you're using an insulator (most of the time), use a single insulator and put compound on both sides. I recommend mica rather than plastic or sil-pad insulators. Sil-pads can work, but for long-term use I would still lean toward mica and compound, esp. for vintage gear.
  • Hard to define this: snug the mounting screws down, but don't go crazy. If you over tighten them, you could warp the transistor or short it to the sink by crushing the insulator. Don't obsess on it, but if you can, go back and check tightness after a few heating and cooling cycles.
  • After you've tightened it down, and BEFORE powering up, use an ohmmeter to make sure there isn't a dead short between the TO and the sink. It happens sometimes, so remove the device and recheck your work. Maybe a burr you missed on the sink or the transistor package? A metal filing swimming in the compound? It happens, wipe it off, check it and redo it. Recheck with the ohmmeter before moving on.
I offer these recommendations as useable anywhere TO transistor packages are being installed on heat sinks, and they've served me well.

On the KR-4140 in question, did exactly the items above. First removed the sink from the chassis and checked for flatness with a file, on both the sink and the transistors. I put in an order for some mica insulators for TO-66 packages (I didn't have any), and in the meantime used a single layer of the old insulators and remounted them with thermal compound. As above, I checked to make sure no transistors were shorted to the sink before powering back up. When the mica ones come in, I'll install them and close it up.

Between the idle current being set, and better mounting, this unit is running WAY cooler. Like I said am really liking the tone of this one!

upload_2023-4-4_10-22-19.jpeg

Kind of excited to see how the newer LED fuselamps will work, have never tried them before, and need to rig up an LED for a stereo light, so we'll see what happens. To be continued...

Rock on

Scottie
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
i did one myself last year.

my thoughts: get rid of the 53 year old caps and the c458s. just because they work today does not mean that they will work tomorrow or even that they are working to their full potential.

it had a nice sound before but an even nicer sound after

mcs 4140 fisher 001.jpg

my outputs had no thermal compound on them either but the insulators were mica and only one per.

i didn't do this one to keep, i did it to sell so i replaced parts that are known to go bad.
 
Painttoad,
my thoughts: get rid of the 53 year old caps and the c458s. just because they work today does not mean that they will work tomorrow or even that they are working to their full potential.

True, it's possible, but I'll be keeping this guy, and I have too many other jobs right now to do a full recap. If this was a 1940s-50s radio like I work on, with wax/paper caps, then yes, all of those fail sooner than later.

Your pic almost looks like the output insulators have white compound haze on them. Illusion? Definitely want to get some mica on mine soon. I trust those old ecaps before those sketchy cellophane insulators it came with!

Thanks!

Scott
 
fresh thermal compound
Rebuilding my skills with a KR-4140. Read post here about adding thermal paste to the output transistors. Have a loud hum as noted on pg 8. Hum dissipates with a strong station or wrapping my hand over the Anntena. AM band. Testing voltages were within manual’s tolerance, so consider the output and transistors to be good.
I do question the clear film between the case and heat sink as well. Not sure what it is? When installed as original I show resistance between the transistor case and heat sink. Would have expected direct short as mounted By screws. Still the screws do not mount direct to the heat sink. Is there an explanation for the film as it is not conductive like thermal paste?

Also, which cap’s are referenced in the preceding post? I already changed out the C458’s to KSC1845’s.
Thx!

IMG_4160.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Rebuilding my skills with a KR-4140. Read post here about adding thermal paste to the output transistors. Have a loud hum as noted on pg 8. Hum dissipates with a strong station or wrapping my hand over the Anntena. AM band. Testing voltages were within manual’s tolerance, so consider the output and transistors to be good.
I do question the clear film between the case and heat sink as well. Not sure what it is? When installed as original I show resistance between the transistor case and heat sink. Would have expected direct short as mounted By screws. Still the screws do not mount direct to the heat sink. Is there an explanation for the film as it is not conductive like thermal paste?

View attachment 3115613

the mica insulators and thermal compound are not conductive. the mica is there to insulate the transistor from the heatsink as the transitor case is the collector.

the thermal paste aids thermal transfer to the heatsink.

as you noticed, the screws do not screw into the heatsink, they screw into a socket behind the heatsink and complete the circuit from the case of the transistor(collector) to the socket to the rest of the unit
 
I am a fan of replacing electrolytics with films where possible, esp. in the signal path, but for now I'm going to leave this unit as-is since it sounds so good.
  • It's a matter of debate regarding changing out all of the ~53 year-old ecaps, and I'll leave that debate for other threads.
  • Same observation regarding the 2SC458s here, they sound good and are working well, am going to leave them for now.
My experience:

Like you, I replace low value e-caps with film caps. I try to do up to 3.3 uF, if they fit and are cost effective. For the same reason I replace all but the largest electrolytics - because I don’t want to have to go back in 5 years and open it up again (on keeper units, I’ll replace PS caps). I used to measure caps as I pulled them out. On some units I found only 10% out of spec. On others, I found 60% out of spec. I’d attribute it mostly to use and environment, secondarily to design. The higher percentage of out of spec caps that were replaced, the more the sound improved.

Not all C458s are created equal. The outhouse-shaped ones used by Kenwood are noisy. I’m surprised that there are any in a 4070: I thought they were done with them by 1976. Anyway, every time I have replaced them the noise floor dropped. Sometimes a little, sometimes a lot, but the result was the same. I’ve never found one that didn’t work, nor have I found one that sounded good. Shoot on sight, no quarter given.

TO-3 transistors from the 70s are surprisingly long lasting. As long as you don’t short them or overheat them they should give years more of service.

Enjoy the receiver!
 
Hey,

Hadn't looked here in a while and no notifications!

Semanon, I'll be working on the 4140 this winter most likely, and will swap out the 458s! 1845s are still cheap and easy to get.

Scottie
 
Back
Top Bottom