• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

KLH Twenty Three (23) Restoration and Questions for Finishing Touches

smodghe

New Member
For a weekend project, I got a pair of KLH Twenty Threes (for free!), sanded, touched up dings and corner damage with epoxy putty/Mixol tobacco brown dye, blended a little with grain pen, applied 2 coats of Danish oil, put foam pipe tape under woofer surrounds, washed/flattened the grilles (still kind of gnarly in spots, but can't find THAT fabric anywhere, lol), and am waiting on some surplus 2uF poly caps from Madisound (2 in parallel per speaker) + .27ohm wirewound resistors to compensate for loss in ESR vs original electrolytics.

During the process, I learned I need to put about as much Mixol as the Quikwood can take to get the color dark enough. Epoxy lightens as it drys, and this particular putty doesn't take oil based stain at all (at least not Danish oil). The bottom corners of one cabinet are much lighter where I repaired because I didn't add enough dye. Wish I had my Mohawk putty still. That stuff was great, and took stain very well without need for dye. Also learned the importance not so much sanding to bare wood, but sanding to a near even coloration if applying a light tint oil stain like medium Walnut. There are dark and light spots where I got more or less of the original finish sanded off. I think the finished product is a vast improvement, but could have been better (before and after pictures to follow, depending on whether there's any interest in this post). Also learned that you can't divide 8 pieces of yellow insulation batts between 2 of these speakers and expect it to sound good. The original tinkerer to these speakers must have thrown out the original stuffing, and threw a couple pieces of insulation in one, and a few more in the other. It sounded......bad. I stole the insulation from a couple "donor" Criterion speakers, and it's a night and day difference. It went from muddy, distorted, bass-less, to clear, forward, with much better low end extension.

I'm going to experiment by dissolving butyl rubber sealant tape (without asphalt additive) in toluene (it's been surmised that can work), and apply that with a brush to the fabric surrounds, as the woofers, when pushed in, spring immediately back, and the weave of surround is very open when held up to light.

Questions to the veterans out there if they will be so generous as to answer (or any other inquisitive/thoughtful takers):

1) Is dissolving butyl sealant tape in toluene possible? Are there any red flags to trying this approach
2) Is the exact grille fabric or another visually/acoustically similar available?
3) Does it matter if I put the small value resistor before or following the tweeter cap to achieve ESR-like attenuation?
4) Would 1.5lbs of fiberglass batts per enclosure be about the right amount? Has anyone ever weighed how much came in their Twenty Threes?
Thanks to all.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
First, congrats on a great score!

Epoxy fillers are terrible in my opinion. As you saw, they don't except stain. I never use it except if there's a bit of separation at corners from moisture damage.
When I did use it, I use JB Woodweld, and mix it with walnut sanding dust I've collected when sanding cabs. It helps darken it close to the finished veneer color.

Regarding the caps, why not just get the correct 4uf cap. No need to replace resistors unless they are broken, or burned looking.

There is no available original grill fabric. Keep an eye out on fleabay for some originals, or post a WTB thread in BT.

Here's a link to my Twenty Three restoration which you may find helpful.

Cheers, Glenn
http://www.audiokarma.org/forums/index.php?threads/klh-twenty-three-restoration-pics.649507/
 
Thank you for your reply!

I think the epoxy has its place. I have no experience with repairing/patching veneer. In the future, I may go to filling with epoxy for strength, and repairing exterior with veneer.

I wanted to go with polypropylene caps for their longevity. The 3 existing resistors I'm leaving in each speaker. I'm adding one .27 ohm wirewound in each to compensate for the super-low ESR of the poly replacement caps.

I'd seen a pair of grilles sell "there" for about $40 recently. Based on a little listening, I'd say they deserve great grilles. OTOH, I don't mind the originals are beat up, as that is somewhat charming and adds character in its own way.

I'd seen your restoration before and during my own, and was very impressed with the quality of your results! I think for $20, you did extremely well. Great job! With any luck, I'll be able to match what you accomplished some day.

Thanks again
 
Thank you for your reply!

I think the epoxy has its place. I have no experience with repairing/patching veneer. In the future, I may go to filling with epoxy for strength, and repairing exterior with veneer.

I wanted to go with polypropylene caps for their longevity. The 3 existing resistors I'm leaving in each speaker. I'm adding one .27 ohm wirewound in each to compensate for the super-low ESR of the poly replacement caps.

I'd seen a pair of grilles sell "there" for about $40 recently. Based on a little listening, I'd say they deserve great grilles. OTOH, I don't mind the originals are beat up, as that is somewhat charming and adds character in its own way.

I'd seen your restoration before and during my own, and was very impressed with the quality of your results! I think for $20, you did extremely well. Great job! With any luck, I'll be able to match what you accomplished some day.

Thanks again

Thanks for that! I'd like to see some pics of yours when you can post them.

Cheers! Glenn
 
Great work on those! How do like their sound?

Regarding the surround sealer, eBay seller vintage-ar sells the correct sealer. Put it on the dust cap as well.

Glenn
 
Great work on those! How do like their sound?

Regarding the surround sealer, eBay seller vintage-ar sells the correct sealer. Put it on the dust cap as well.

Glenn

I'm with Glenn on the surround sealer. It does sound like you're on the right track in your thinking regarding developing a concoction to spread on the surrounds but I'd be inclined to just order in the sealer. No used taking a chance on screwing things up. IMO the sealer is as important as the recap. I had a chance to hear a restored set of New Large Advents (NLA's) this past weekend that sounded great but I still like the 23's a little more. IMO there's not many two way speakers vintage or modern with the overall warmth, bottom end, and midrange of the 23's. My HF hearing is shot so I can't speak to the HF presentation. :D Congrats on the score!
 
Eeeek! I've got 4 of those things in my garage awaiting my tender ministrations. Maybe I should get to it?

Yeah, epoxy fillers ain't got no pores for stuff to soak into. I'm hoping this year I can get my hands on some of Mohawk's products. User 4-2-7 has been using them for years with superior results. Not that I have any chance of getting the same results as he does, but I'd sure like to try them.

Congratulations on the fine score.

Biggles
 
Great work on those! How do like their sound?

Regarding the surround sealer, eBay seller vintage-ar sells the correct sealer. Put it on the dust cap as well.

Glenn
Thank you again for your thoughts! I'll be sure to lightly paint the dust cap with solution. I was about to press the button on buying from vintage-ar, as you suggest, but they are on vacation presently. I'm taking a chance making my own concoction, conservatively applied, that mimics the original formulation. I'll let the site know, one way or the other, how it pans out.
 
I'm with Glenn on the surround sealer. It does sound like you're on the right track in your thinking regarding developing a concoction to spread on the surrounds but I'd be inclined to just order in the sealer. No used taking a chance on screwing things up. IMO the sealer is as important as the recap. I had a chance to hear a restored set of New Large Advents (NLA's) this past weekend that sounded great but I still like the 23's a little more. IMO there's not many two way speakers vintage or modern with the overall warmth, bottom end, and midrange of the 23's. My HF hearing is shot so I can't speak to the HF presentation. :D Congrats on the score!
I'll be firmly on one side or the other after I try out my homemade version of sealant, lol. You do make a compelling argument, no doubt. I just have to go my own way a little on this. Trust... I learn, though it's often the hard way! Thanks for taking the time to congratulate, caution, and inform. I really appreciate it! I definitely give a nod to the 23's over my OLAs for the same reasons you do over the NLAs.
 
Last edited:
Eeeek! I've got 4 of those things in my garage awaiting my tender ministrations. Maybe I should get to it?

Yeah, epoxy fillers ain't got no pores for stuff to soak into. I'm hoping this year I can get my hands on some of Mohawk's products. User 4-2-7 has been using them for years with superior results. Not that I have any chance of getting the same results as he does, but I'd sure like to try them.

Congratulations on the fine score.

Biggles
Do yourself a favor, and get ahold of it! I was very pleased with the results on my AR-5s with Mohawk walnut epoxy putty. Thank you for commenting!
 
Last edited:
I'll be firmly on one side or the other after I try out my homemade version of sealant, lol. You do make a compelling argument, no doubt. I just have to go my own way a little on this. Trust... I learn, though it's often the hard way! Thanks for taking the time to congratulate, caution, and inform. I really appreciate it! I definitely give a nod to the 23's over my OLAs for the same reasons you do over the NLAs.
If you're making your own sealant, make sure you mix in enough toulene so the mixture is very thin and easy to brush on. The reason Roy C. developed the sealer was because so many bad concoctions were ruining surrounds and drivers. A lot of measured testing whent into its development. I'm not trying to dissuade from making your own, but you might consider buying a jar so you can see the consistency and if your mix doesn't come out as planned, you'll have good sealer that's proven.

Glenn
 
If you're making your own sealant, make sure you mix in enough toulene so the mixture is very thin and easy to brush on. The reason Roy C. developed the sealer was because so many bad concoctions were ruining surrounds and drivers. A lot of measured testing whent into its development. I'm not trying to dissuade from making your own, but you might consider buying a jar so you can see the consistency and if your mix doesn't come out as planned, you'll have good sealer that's proven.

Glenn
I will definitely thin it to a milk-like consistency, adding more as I go if it dissolves out of solution. I'm right there with you on visually comparing Roy C's with my own (not to say that looks aren't deceiving). I will buy a jar for comparison and backup purposes when the store re-opens, hopefully in a few more days. Thanks for the generous time you've given to helping me along. It's appreciated!
 
I will definitely thin it to a milk-like consistency, adding more as I go if it dissolves out of solution. I'm right there with you on visually comparing Roy C's with my own (not to say that looks aren't deceiving). I will buy a jar for comparison and backup purposes when the store re-opens, hopefully in a few more days. Thanks for the generous time you've given to helping me along. It's appreciated!
You bet! The sealer from vintage-ar will have a maple (real) syrup consistency. It's not watery.
 
Great work on those! How do like their sound?
As to their sound, the mids and lows blow me away. It's probably the most engaging pair of speakers I have. They are so energetic and lively. My redope experiment hopes to soften and seal to get a bit more low end extension and control. I put on some Nikolai Tcherepnin and Debussy works for orchestra, and wasn't as impressed as I was when I had flipped on some soul/R&B/rock music earlier. "The lowest notes should be able to come out of these boxes and these woofers, based on their size", my intuition told me. I guess I'll find out soon!
 
As to their sound, the mids and lows blow me away. It's probably the most engaging pair of speakers I have. They are so energetic and lively. My redope experiment hopes to soften and seal to get a bit more low end extension and control. I put on some Nikolai Tcherepnin and Debussy works for orchestra, and wasn't as impressed as I was when I had flipped on some soul/R&B/rock music earlier. "The lowest notes should be able to come out of these boxes and these woofers, based on their size", my intuition told me. I guess I'll find out soon!

You'll notice a sizable difference in the LF's once the sealer goes on. The 23's share the same woofer as the 5's and I have tested my 5's down to 25hz without a problem.
 
I didn't want to get too nutty with numbers before letting my ears decide, but am glad you volunteer you tested down that low. The only previous mention of KLH 23 low end response I recall reading is someone believed they played down to only about 40hz (which seemed fairly high). Great info!

Edit: I think the mega magnets have something to do with the LF response, lol. Impressive the first time I grabbed one out of the box.
 
Once sealed, give them some space with some good clean power. You will be a happy camper!
 
Back
Top Bottom