• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Mac MC602

730waters

New Member
I am working on picking up a MC602 amp to replace my MC2205. I am running 2 other MC2300's and want something that has the power to push my Sonus Faber Cremona's that will blend in power wise. What good or bad thoughts do you have of the MC602.
 
Register to hide this ad
I am working on picking up a MC602 amp to replace my MC2205. I am running 2 other MC2300's and want something that has the power to push my Sonus Faber Cremona's that will blend in power wise. What good or bad thoughts do you have of the MC602.
Nobody here owns one. It’s my understanding that this particular amplifier was voiced to sound like a Mark Levinson amplifier that McIntosh borrowed from Audio Classics - which means it’s quite unique indeed as Mc doesn’t voice amps. The weight (155lbs) is likely a reason why more don’t own ‘em.
 
Nobody here owns one. It’s my understanding that this particular amplifier was voiced to sound like a Mark Levinson amplifier that McIntosh borrowed from Audio Classics - which means it’s quite unique indeed as Mc doesn’t voice amps. The weight (155lbs) is likely a reason why more don’t own ‘em.

That's extremely odd if true. Please enlighten us on where you heard that McIntosh did this.
 
Not saying that what you heard is bogus, but I find it to be very suspect that McIntosh would be insecure enough to try to "voice" a component to match a competitor's sound qualities. It's unsettling that they would also choose Levinson as a target. I've always considered them to be too dry for my tastes.
 
The voicing information sounds like some bloviation from a former sales trainer/store owner/sales person.........not a uncommon tactic on too many sales floors.
 
I have owned Mac equipment for a while and have never listened to any Levinson equipment so I wouldn't have any idea of them try to mimic Levinson. I have listened to Mac equipment through friends for over 40 years and I enjoy the sound of the older amps and feel that the MC602 would be a good fit sound wise with my system. Mac's have their unique sound and I feel can't be beat. I have talked to a friend of mine that listened to the MC602 about 8 to 9 years ago and he said it has a great sound.
 
I have owned Mac equipment for a while and have never listened to any Levinson equipment so I wouldn't have any idea of them try to mimic Levinson. I have listened to Mac equipment through friends for over 40 years and I enjoy the sound of the older amps and feel that the MC602 would be a good fit sound wise with my system. Mac's have their unique sound and I feel can't be beat. I have talked to a friend of mine that listened to the MC602 about 8 to 9 years ago and he said it has a great sound.
I’d personally love to hear one in my space. I did almost buy one a few years ago.

As for the ML rumor, I sure as hell am not the one that started it. It would be interesting to see if it has merit.
 
The voicing information sounds like some bloviation from a former sales trainer/store owner/sales person.........not a uncommon tactic on too many sales floors.
Call Audio Classics and ask Ryan. I’d love to know ...
 
I do not believe from the amplifier engineering perspective McIntosh takes, that they would "voice" an amplifier at all.
McIntosh design, engineer, and build the best performing amplifiers possible, they don't build them then reverse engineer them to sound like something else, it makes no sense at all.

I agree with Chris on this matter......

Speaking of Ugly amplifiers, Krell take 1st prize there!!
 
You know there is a story out there about the ML engineer's checking out how neutral the McIntosh autoformers really were......and when I was in Roger's inner sanctum decades ago there were other speakers there for evaluation as well as some prototypes.

So Mac evaluating a different amp on the bench, sure, but trying to do a Bob Carveresque revoiceing........bloviation.
 
You know there is a story out there about the ML engineer's checking out how neutral the McIntosh autoformers really were......and when I was in Roger's inner sanctum decades ago there were other speakers there for evaluation as well as some prototypes.

So Mac evaluating a different amp on the bench, sure, but trying to do a Bob Carveresque revoiceing........bloviation.
So, you called Audio Classics? I have no idea ...

BTW, that was my story about ML and the autoformers as it was told to me over dinner at a proceed event by an engineer that participated in it with Mark ...
 
You know there is a story out there about the ML engineer's checking out how neutral the McIntosh autoformers really were......and when I was in Roger's inner sanctum decades ago there were other speakers there for evaluation as well as some prototypes.

So Mac evaluating a different amp on the bench, sure, but trying to do a Bob Carveresque revoiceing........bloviation.
Post #39 ... https://audiokarma.org/forums/index.php?threads/ultimate-advice-mc2300-mc2500-mc2600.371236/page-2
 
Boy are we spinning away from the OP's questions......I my self would want mono blocks instead of the stero unit.

As the OP says in the first few words" I am working on picking one up" you better engage a few friends and a couple bottles of single malt to compesate them for the help in picking one up.

I could give you a true story about Gow acquiring a product to preview and run through engineering but that would drift this even further off the OP's track.
 
I am not in the stereo business, I am in the automotive engineering business. But we constantly benchmark the competition. It is a sound business practice. I would be shocked if somebody at McIntosh WASN'T testing out the competition - especially speakers where the sound signature can vary drastically.

As for OP's question, I heard a set of MC611's at Axpona a few months ago, (running B&W 800D3's off a C2600) and it was the best sounding system I have ever heard. That's my bucket list system. If you want that much power, I would say go separates too, based on that.

-Geoff
 
Nobody here owns one. It’s my understanding that this particular amplifier was voiced to sound like a Mark Levinson amplifier that McIntosh borrowed from Audio Classics - which means it’s quite unique indeed as Mc doesn’t voice amps. The weight (155lbs) is likely a reason why more don’t own ‘em.

Ah HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I posited a question last year about this exact topic. I asked how/if McIntosh voices their amps and the response I got back was mostly along the lines of "of course NOT - they design by specs alone".

So they DO voice their amps after all. Was/is this the only one ? I somehow doubt that....

:-)


jblnut
 
Ah HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I posited a question last year about this exact topic. I asked how/if McIntosh voices their amps and the response I got back was mostly along the lines of "of course NOT - they design by specs alone".

So they DO voice their amps after all. Was/is this the only one ? I somehow doubt that....

:)


jblnut
We really should corroborate the story ... I’ve personally never even laid eyes on one.
 
Ah HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I posited a question last year about this exact topic. I asked how/if McIntosh voices their amps and the response I got back was mostly along the lines of "of course NOT - they design by specs alone".

So they DO voice their amps after all. Was/is this the only one ? I somehow doubt that....

:)


jblnut
No, not ah ha, there is no evidence McIntosh voice their amps to sound like other manufacturers amps, for that you need to go to the Carver site.
McIntosh design and build amplifiers which reproduce music as accurately as possible, this "voicing" nonsense would get in the way of that, simple....
 
Back
Top Bottom