Nobody here owns one. It’s my understanding that this particular amplifier was voiced to sound like a Mark Levinson amplifier that McIntosh borrowed from Audio Classics - which means it’s quite unique indeed as Mc doesn’t voice amps. The weight (155lbs) is likely a reason why more don’t own ‘em.I am working on picking up a MC602 amp to replace my MC2205. I am running 2 other MC2300's and want something that has the power to push my Sonus Faber Cremona's that will blend in power wise. What good or bad thoughts do you have of the MC602.
Nobody here owns one. It’s my understanding that this particular amplifier was voiced to sound like a Mark Levinson amplifier that McIntosh borrowed from Audio Classics - which means it’s quite unique indeed as Mc doesn’t voice amps. The weight (155lbs) is likely a reason why more don’t own ‘em.
It’s been said multiple times here over the years. Maybe Ryan @AudioClassics1 could chime in.That's extremely odd if true. Please enlighten us on where you heard that McIntosh did this.
I’d personally love to hear one in my space. I did almost buy one a few years ago.I have owned Mac equipment for a while and have never listened to any Levinson equipment so I wouldn't have any idea of them try to mimic Levinson. I have listened to Mac equipment through friends for over 40 years and I enjoy the sound of the older amps and feel that the MC602 would be a good fit sound wise with my system. Mac's have their unique sound and I feel can't be beat. I have talked to a friend of mine that listened to the MC602 about 8 to 9 years ago and he said it has a great sound.
Call Audio Classics and ask Ryan. I’d love to know ...The voicing information sounds like some bloviation from a former sales trainer/store owner/sales person.........not a uncommon tactic on too many sales floors.
So, you called Audio Classics? I have no idea ...You know there is a story out there about the ML engineer's checking out how neutral the McIntosh autoformers really were......and when I was in Roger's inner sanctum decades ago there were other speakers there for evaluation as well as some prototypes.
So Mac evaluating a different amp on the bench, sure, but trying to do a Bob Carveresque revoiceing........bloviation.
Post #39 ... https://audiokarma.org/forums/index.php?threads/ultimate-advice-mc2300-mc2500-mc2600.371236/page-2You know there is a story out there about the ML engineer's checking out how neutral the McIntosh autoformers really were......and when I was in Roger's inner sanctum decades ago there were other speakers there for evaluation as well as some prototypes.
So Mac evaluating a different amp on the bench, sure, but trying to do a Bob Carveresque revoiceing........bloviation.
Nobody here owns one. It’s my understanding that this particular amplifier was voiced to sound like a Mark Levinson amplifier that McIntosh borrowed from Audio Classics - which means it’s quite unique indeed as Mc doesn’t voice amps. The weight (155lbs) is likely a reason why more don’t own ‘em.
We really should corroborate the story ... I’ve personally never even laid eyes on one.Ah HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I posited a question last year about this exact topic. I asked how/if McIntosh voices their amps and the response I got back was mostly along the lines of "of course NOT - they design by specs alone".
So they DO voice their amps after all. Was/is this the only one ? I somehow doubt that....
jblnut
No, not ah ha, there is no evidence McIntosh voice their amps to sound like other manufacturers amps, for that you need to go to the Carver site.Ah HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I posited a question last year about this exact topic. I asked how/if McIntosh voices their amps and the response I got back was mostly along the lines of "of course NOT - they design by specs alone".
So they DO voice their amps after all. Was/is this the only one ? I somehow doubt that....
jblnut