Well, I don't think the OP minds that we've derailed the thread a bit - such is the norm here anyhow.I have owned Mac equipment for a while and have never listened to any Levinson equipment so I wouldn't have any idea of them try to mimic Levinson. I have listened to Mac equipment through friends for over 40 years and I enjoy the sound of the older amps and feel that the MC602 would be a good fit sound wise with my system. Mac's have their unique sound and I feel can't be beat. I have talked to a friend of mine that listened to the MC602 about 8 to 9 years ago and he said it has a great sound.
That's pretty common and perfectly within reason.I stand by my assertion that at some point I the design and manufacturing process someone actually listens to it, and if necessary changes are made. I did not say they were trying to copy another amp sound.
Jblnut
Yeah that's crazy but also typical. I guess it all depends on the deal you can get on the amp.I appreciate the comparison chart. The 2300's are old school in style and sound, but they truly depict the music that I have listened to for 45 years, The newer Mac's are clean and sound great. I have listened to a set of Mono 501's run through a c2600 and they sounded incredible, but still different from the 2300's. I am on a final quest to get my Mac system to where I want it before I retire in a few years. The 190lb shipping weight is a sticking point in the final negotiations at this point. They want $500 to ship it up to where I live and I feel that is outrageous. My buddy is trying to get me look at the MC452 or MC462 if I want to stick with a one piece unit. Some of the people that chimed in recommended a pair of mono's and so does my buddy that has the MC501's.
I agree, this makes sense for sure. I think we are all on the same page here.I stand by my assertion that at some point I the design and manufacturing process someone actually listens to it, and if necessary changes are made. I did not say they were trying to copy another amp sound.
Jblnut
Sometimes I think I want a pair of MC601's, because it might be "better", this changes when I sit and listen to my music, my system delivers the music to my ears in such a pleasant way that I believe I am at the point of diminishing returns....I appreciate the comparison chart. The 2300's are old school in style and sound, but they truly depict the music that I have listened to for 45 years, The newer Mac's are clean and sound great. I have listened to a set of Mono 501's run through a c2600 and they sounded incredible, but still different from the 2300's. I am on a final quest to get my Mac system to where I want it before I retire in a few years. The 190lb shipping weight is a sticking point in the final negotiations at this point. They want $500 to ship it up to where I live and I feel that is outrageous. My buddy is trying to get me look at the MC452 or MC462 if I want to stick with a one piece unit. Some of the people that chimed in recommended a pair of mono's and so does my buddy that has the MC501's.
Seems like their former owner also courted an MC602 for a while . . .I suspect that the OP's Mc2300's were owned by Moi in the not too distant past....![]()
Almost bought one @ A.C., but they had a 'C1' Mc500 at a bargain price,(It looked like new)Seems like their former owner also courted an MC602 for a while . . .![]()
Therein is the rub. A 155lb amplifier with a glass faceplate - might as well be shipping a pallet of Faberge eggs. If you want the MC602, then tell Audio Classics to put the feeler out for one for you and then broker a deal with them that includes shipping. That's exactly what I did with the MC500. When they found one, I got the call and we inked a deal. They shipped it to me in the very same box used for the MC602 (massive) and it came by freight on a pallet. Even still, it was quite difficult to unload from the truck when it showed up as few of us have a forklift parked around back. I think this is why so few folks actually pursue the MC602.I bought both 2300's from Bob and without a doubt it was 1 of the best decisions that I have made. They have a sound that I haven't heard replicated in other equipment. The newer equipment has it own presence of sound that distinguishes from others. have consulted Bob on several items that I have looked at for guidance. To seal the deal for the MC602 - McIntosh wanted $200 for a shipping container to be built and shipped and the Seller wanted about $500 to ship the unit to me. I would have been paying in the mid 6 thousands for the amp. I am just wondering whether a set of mono 501's which I have listened to or a MC452 which is newer. would definitely be a better choice. I figured that there is a lot of very knowledgeable that could shed some extra light on the good and bad of each system. I do thank everyone that chimed in on the subject.
I love my MC2300s but bought a MC452, in January, because I wanted something that I shouldn't have to worry about for 25 years, or so.As for your MC2300s . . . let's just say that we're kindred spirits there. @gmc also has a pair and he isn't anxious to sell them either. I've had about 25 over the years, still have two and I use them every single day.
I'm very happy that you are enjoying the amps, Greg!I bought both 2300's from Bob and without a doubt it was 1 of the best decisions that I have made. They have a sound that I haven't heard replicated in other equipment. The newer equipment has it own presence of sound that distinguishes from others. have consulted Bob on several items that I have looked at for guidance. To seal the deal for the MC602 - McIntosh wanted $200 for a shipping container to be built and shipped and the Seller wanted about $500 to ship the unit to me. I would have been paying in the mid 6 thousands for the amp. I am just wondering whether a set of mono 501's which I have listened to or a MC452 which is newer. would definitely be a better choice. I figured that there is a lot of very knowledgeable that could shed some extra light on the good and bad of each system. I do thank everyone that chimed in on the subject.