Jeff Jacob
New Member
View attachment 1568163 View attachment 1568164 View attachment 1568166 View attachment 1568168 View attachment 1568170 View attachment 1568172 View attachment 1568173 View attachment 1568174 View attachment 1568176 View attachment 1568178I happen to be lucky enough to have both of these amps. I spent 6 mo on each one restoring and upgrading what I was able to. After adequate burning in and other minor adjustments, I think I can speak intelligently and objectively about them. You can say I was the brains for the design upgrades, and Jimmy, from Electronics Service Center in Rockville MD, the technician that made it so. His willingness and ability to execute my extreme ideas have made for a super working relationship. Our coraboration was on the Marantz amp, and we have been going strong since.
Let me start by saying that I love both the Marantz and the Sansui amplifiers. Both have good power, great sound, and awesome looks. Both amps received the full complement of Elna Silmic ii capacitors, and Nichicon Gold Through power filter caps. Of course many other resistors, relays, cleaning and solder work went in. Both got complete sets of gold RCA jacks, upgraded speaker binding posts, as well as real solid power cords. The Sansui got the better speaker connections and superior RCA jacks. The Marantz got the Kimber Kable PK14 gold power cord. Also both got all new power transistors. Here is where the Marantz continues beyond the standard restoration process. We replaced the flimsy, 40 yr old speaker wiring between the amp's connectors to the relay, and the switches, with Kimber Kable 8TC. Yes, a pain in the but. Also the flimsy 22 ga ground wiring with serious 12 ga pure copper. Also added a small heat sink on the back for additional cooling.
For A-B comparisons, I am using identical JBL 120ti speakers, Audio Research CD1 CD player, Kimber Kable 8TC speaker cables and Audioquest King Cobra for interconnects, all protected and fed by a Monster HTPS7000 power center.
So which is superior ? It depends on many things, the person, the speakers, and the signal they are receiving. Personally, I would lean towards the Marantz. The soundstage, or presence, seems a bit wider, and the bass slam has a little more authority. I also can feel the sound and place the space of the instruments and voices, better with the Marantz. You can almost cut the sound with a knife. A lot of air coming from those JBL's. I can't be sure if the internal wiring in the Marantz didn't produce this edge, but it's there. What I can say for sure, is that this 80 watt Sansui, and 90 watt Marantz, hits my JBL's better and harder than many 150-200 watt amps I've had before. I can also say definitively, that the average person buying one of these beautiful vintage amps from wherever, will not get to enjoy this level of performance.
Last, I will say that it has become a craze in the marketplace for scavengers to score a 40 yr old amp that has spent the last 10-20 yrs rusting in a garage or damp basement, for say, nothing, and turn around and sell for mega bucks to unknowing people wanting to live the dream. These scavengers, that wipe down a faceplate, replace a few light bulbs, and clean some switches, claim they have serviced or restored a vintage unit. Sorry for the unsuspecting buyers. If you want the quality that made a Marantz or Sansui famous, you have to consider spending real money, real effort, and real time to restore an old machine.
Every once in a while, I run into somebody that is both honest and talented, and loves audio. Their work and results are appreciated by few, lucky enough to come across them. Enjoy.
Last edited:











