• Please note that Audiokarma will be offline briefly for updates early on Monday morning, September 28th.

Marantz 250 Semi-Ground & a Question of Stability

sstudley

Member
Posting for my friend, and for general edification:

“The Marantz 250(M) amplifier inputs have a voltage, appearing on post #2, whose purpose is not entirely clear to me, as an amateur electronics enthusiast of modest technical knowledge. I’m hoping someone with real EE chops can clarify the function of this circuit node.

Basically, the aforementioned post #2 voltage is ultra close to ground, and appears to be slightly higher impedance, heavily bypassed to ground, and otherwise no different from ground. Its sole purpose appears to be to bias various transistors. My expectation is that many would look at this and think “Hmm, this looks like a less noisy, ‘filtered’ ground.”

On closer examination, I doubt this intuition, though as mentioned, I am no EE. Again, this semi-ground has higher impedance than actual ground (though it is still quite low), and any noise that might be present on ground should be coupled fairly directly via the tantalum capacitor (albeit subject to the tantalum’s nonzero ESR). Furthermore, it seems possible that any differences between this point and ground would show up as ground noise injected into the power stage, as a difference between the output transistor’s “noise free” version of the input signal, and later stage ground (but a complete analysis would also consider the supply rails, and seems rather involved).

It is certainly possibly, and maybe likely, that I’m misunderstanding the purpose of this circuit node. I would appreciate any insights that those who fully understand the circuit can impart, in terms accessible to the amateur electronics dabbler.”

(End of friend’s question.)

As a side note, I have repaired numerous such amps, and have noted the general tendency of these amps toward some level of instability. Although much of that instability appears to be related to bias and DC offset, and presumably is a byproduct of somewhat less sophisticated biasing and temperature compensation, my loose hunch is that the front end seems somehow to be the source of some of the instability. Adding to my friend’s question, I speculate that this pseudo-ground could have something to do with the problem.

Definitive insights into the purpose of this pseudo-ground will be gratefully received. Thanks in advance!
 
Register to hide this ad
I think it's just a (common?) solution to limiting ground currents to a sensible value by raising the impedance to something greater than zero. I'm assuming there's no other chassis connection. I've only worked on one of these (mine) and IMO the voltage ratings of some transistors are way too close to the operating point. There's a bunch of info over at Diyaudio, some of which is beyond my pay grade. I did get mine stable and happy. For the love of dog, don't ever forget to plug the connector back on the bias transistor when you power up after a repair, or you'll lose the outputs and have to rebuild the thing all over again.
 
I think it's just a (common?) solution to limiting ground currents to a sensible value by raising the impedance to something greater than zero. I'm assuming there's no other chassis connection. I've only worked on one of these (mine) and IMO the voltage ratings of some transistors are way too close to the operating point. There's a bunch of info over at Diyaudio, some of which is beyond my pay grade. I did get mine stable and happy. For the love of dog, don't ever forget to plug the connector back on the bias transistor when you power up after a repair, or you'll lose the outputs and have to rebuild the thing all over again.

Voice of experience?

Tony
 
If you compare the 250(M) schematic to the 250 (in which all grounds are tied together to chassis ground) the (M) separates the signal ground from chassis ground with a filter. It looks like the designer doesn't expect much noise since the 100uF is only 3V. This is probably an attempt to reduce noise induced through the external ground either through ground loops, ground voltage differences, or induced noise. Otherwise, the circuits look similar except for the input transistor configuration.

Marantz 250 Schematic:
upload_2022-3-19_15-46-38.png
 
I’m the guy (John) who asked the question that Stephen posted. Blame me for the bad idea of asking him to post for me on AK. I’ve successfully got my login going again, and will post my questions and comments directly, henceforth. (Thank you, Stephen!)

It seems to me that significant details of my question may have been overlooked:

1. If this node is supposed to be a quieter ground, please explain how that works. Every single bit of noise on actual ground at all but the lowest frequencies (where coupling impedance rises to 10 ohms) is conducted over to this point through the tantalum. How could it possibly be appreciably quieter than ground?

2. If we assume this ground is quieter, then what happens later, when the output of the small signal input stage is coupled into the power stage? The power stage uses actual ground, and the differences between that ground and the other (again, we’re presuming there are some) would show up as noise added into the input to the pre-drivers. If this is incorrect, please explain why.

Thanks, -jar
 
Back
Top Bottom