TeiscoGuitar
New Member
There seems to be a lot of hate online for this generation of Marantz, which is a real shame.
I think it has two great things going for it.
1. It sounds better than any other receiver I have ever had
2. It wasn't like 400-900 dollars.
So where does the hate stem from in these transitional units? It would seems to have a lot of carryover parts and design.
Sure it's not as rugged as earlier Marantz, but it's works perfectly after 35 years.
I think it has two great things going for it.
1. It sounds better than any other receiver I have ever had
2. It wasn't like 400-900 dollars.
So where does the hate stem from in these transitional units? It would seems to have a lot of carryover parts and design.
Sure it's not as rugged as earlier Marantz, but it's works perfectly after 35 years.
Attachments
Last edited: