• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Mirage OM-10

ScooterMcTav

I know less than I think
Afternoon All,

After witnessing a seriously impressive demo with a set of Definitive Technology BP-10, it occurred to me that I've never owned or tried a set of bipolar or omnipolar speakers in my home.

As much as I love precision imaging and instrument placement, I also hate how being removed from the sweetspot (or even holding my head at the wrong angle) creates small niggles that end up reducing my enjoyment in listening to the music.

So, it looks like I will end up with set of Mirage OM-10 (a little more common here in Canada as they were made by API) to try out in my main stereo rig, and I am very curious, and cautiously excited about the way these will sound.

Plus, with their sloped front and rear baffles, they not only look cool, but I imagine this time aligns the drivers reasonably well.

Just curious of anyone else using these specific speakers for 2-channel, and where they felt they improved their sound vs. tradition direct designs.
 
Register to hide this ad
My opinion, if you want a Mirage OM series, go with the earlier versions. The OM-5 and OM-7, or go even earlier and find and M3si, M5si or M7si. The OM-10 missed the mark, IMO. The M3si will FLOOR you.
 
Well as much as I would like to find one of the ones mentioned, the OM-10 were both available and affordable, so they came home.

First off, these things are sexy. As in modern looking sexy, without being gaudy like my Wharfedale Diamond 10.6. Tall and elegant, these will pass the WAF test.

So after moving my rig to its new room, the tubes were warmed up, and a few of my favourite test discs went in. Speakers were placed facing straight ahead, and approx 2' from the rear wall.

Toto, we're not in Kansas anymore.

First off, these towers get prestigious bass for their modest driver complement. When running my Soliloquy, I need to give the system some sort of bass push to get the bottom end to fill out. These guys filled the bottom end much more effortlessly, even when running flat, which allows me to adjust my bass to taste. Proper.

They also fit the description of being a "soft focus" on the recording. This was a plus and a minus; on the minus side, the speakers do not resolve the hyper-specific placement some recordings have. For example, "Sultans of Swing" by Dire Straits suffered with the more diffuse sound stage.

However, on more spacious or airy recordings, the sound was stunning. I have a DG Resonance pressing of Beethoven's 9th that I adore. When the choral part begins in the fourth movement, I was immediately transported directly to the concert hall. The bi(omni) polar nature of the speakers gave depth to a vocal part that can often would sound flat compared to the rest of the symphony's presentation.

So a few more discs went on
- Cascada's "Just the Hits" CD which was "wall of sound" engaging, and full of energy.
- Ritchie Sambora's "Undiscovered Soul" CD which like the Dire Straits, gave up some focus, and lost some immediacy
- Janis Joplin's "Greatest Hits" vinyl, which benefitted from a wider ambiance added to the recording
- Ghost "Square Hammer" iTunes, which was simply toe tapping great
- Gloryhammer "Universe on Fire" iTunes which also sounded great.

In fact, I would almost think the speakers were somewhat laid back in the mids, as I saw no sign of the midrange harshness that can permeate digital media.

I tried moving the speakers 3' away from the rear wall, and some sort of odd wave cancellation must have been taking place, as some weird holes showed up in the sound, and recordings generally lost all focus.

I then went 4' from the wall and slightly toe-in, and the sound regained its coherence, plus reduced and tightened up the bass response.

Overall, this has been a crap-bucket full of fun for a whopping $300, and I'm looking forward to dragging down the Soliloquy to head-to-head them. I see that these speakers have some very serious potential to sound good. Unfortunately, I'm also away from home for the next week.

In parting, there were two main things that struck me about the speakers:
1 - It was sure nice to be able to still hear good sound other than in the perfect spot, and to be able to turn my head without it trashing the imaging.
2 - These are extremely listenable, non fatiguing speakers. Listening to Ritchie, I found myself three songs in when only expecting to listen to one, as I was engrossed in the music, instead of clinically nitpicking everything I heard.

Will report back once I get the head-to-head underway.
 
There's nothing quite the same as a well designed dipole. And Mirage did an excellent job with the genre. Now that you have the bug, you'll be seeking an M3si for sure
 
Although it appears only Baco99 and I are interested in this thread, I just wanted to put up a last few posts comparing the OM-10 to my Soliloquy 6.2. Of note, Tim Shea from SoundStage purchased a set of the 6.2 to use as his own reference speakers, so they must have some redeeming qualities, even at their 2003 MSRP of $2,700 USD. In 2000, the OM-10 were at an MSRP of $1,200 (~$1,310 in 2003 dollars) or less than half of the Soliloquy.

First off, I wanted to give the Soliloquy a fair shake, as I had always been concerned that I had them placed too close to their back wall, muddying the sound. In the new listening area I have set up, the speakers are on an epoxied concrete floor, in a cedar tongue and groove lined room, with carpet and furniture in front of them. The ceiling is acoustical tile. In short, there are not a lot of harsh reflective surfaces in the listening area, and I can place the speakers anywhere from 0'-4' from the back wall.

They generally operated like direct speakers do. Close to the wall, the bass increased, and the soundstage narrowed. Farther from the wall and closer to the listener, the soundstage widened, and the bass dropped substantially. I had to raise the bass by at least 7db on the preamp to obtain a satisfactory amount of bass. This is compared to the Mirage which had adequate bass running flat 1' from the wall, and only needed a small ~2db boost when moved out to 4'. Bass wise, advantage Mirage. It plumbs to a depth that the Soliloquy only hint at getting to, and they get there much easier.

The Soliloquy are known for the quality of their mids, and they do perform well here. Vocals had immediacy and presence. Upper mids had proper air and texture. Lower mids were a little thin, but not a surprise knowing the bass-shy nature of the speakers. The Mirage had decent mids with a more diffuse soundstage, but not at the quality level of the Soliloquy. However, there was a hair's breadth of difference here, with the Soliloquy winning on technical merit, while the Mirage had very listenable mids. And for some of us, that mid precision the Soliloquy had can make speakers move from "Wow, precise" to "Wow, fatiguing" in a surprisingly short time. I'll call the mids a draw.

At the top end of the spectrum, the dome tweeters of the Mirage could not keep up with the sizzling hots of the Soliloquy. The Soliloquy have great snap and sizzle on strings and cymbals, again, with a high level of precision and clarity. Possibly it is part of the bipolar experience, but I found the Mirage to be missing some of this crispness. Possibly a little bump on the Treble dB might have sharpened up the Mirage a bit, and I was surprised at this finding, especially as the Soliloquy have a silk dome (coated) while the Mirage have the dual titanium domes. This is the first time I have heard such a laid back metal dome - not complaints, I just expected a little more sharpness. Winner this round - the Soliloquy.

In other qualities, the Soliloquy look like speakers, albeit nice ones. The Mirage look like "2001: A Space Odyssey" props. Depending on your listening space, either will likely fit right in, as both are tall, and have similar footprints. The Soliloquy are also traditional direct speakers, in that a little toe-in firms up the soundstage, though the soundstage they throw can be narrow. The Mirage improve only marginally from toe-in, and provide a wider soundstage, one that makes listening to them a lot less fussy that the Soliloquy. Each has their merits, and would depend on one's preferences. A lot of the price difference between the two seems to have gone into the cabinetry - the Soliloquy are dense, well built, 4-side veneered speakers, with a heavy metal plinth, and ingenious spikes. The Mirage are lighter weight speakers, with a plastic-capped MDF top, covered in an acoustic sock. One can see that one pair is a set of handcrafted speakers, and the other is a set of mass-manufactured speakers.

To steal some of Tim Shea's writing, he stated that speakers are like figure skaters; one can win on technical merit, while one can win on artistic merit. I really felt that way with these two sets of speakers - the Soliloquy were technically superior with crisper highs and firmer mids, while the Mirage were artistic in creating space, and not overwhelming the listener with any part of its presentation. That all being said, I think the Soliloquy may be going up on the local classifieds sometime soon, as the easy-listening and dynamic nature of the Mirage suit my ears, room, and music styles a bit better that the Soliloquy.
 
I have Mirage m595 IS speakers in my main system. They replaced my DCM TF-600's. They won out in mid-range clarity, have a similar sound-stage. I did have to add a sub-woofer, however.

I'm a believer.
 
There's nothing quite the same as a well designed dipole. And Mirage did an excellent job with the genre. Now that you have the bug, you'll be seeking an M3si for sure

I totally agree! The M3SI's are very impressive speakers. Plus, they totally disappear in a room. Spooky, how well they cast a sound stage, with no perception of sound, emanating from the speaker.
 
...Mirage have the dual titanium domes. This is the first time I have heard such a laid back metal dome.

If like the earlier "M3si, M5si or M7si", that Baco99 noted, this might not be entirely accurate. Mirage produced a "1" (25mm) PTH™ Pure Titanium Hybrid™" tweeter, for quite a while. While it was a titanium dome, the titanium was vapor deposited over top of a soft, woven dome tweeter. That's why they called it a Hybrid dome. A local shop carried the full line-up, and you could definitely see the woven material under the titanium coating. That may contribute to their smooth nature. Good tweeters, regardless.
 
My opinion, if you want a Mirage OM series, go with the earlier versions. The OM-5 and OM-7, or go even earlier and find and M3si, M5si or M7si. The OM-10 missed the mark, IMO. The M3si will FLOOR you.
Just so there's no confusion om 10, om 7 and om 5 are all the same series with the pth tweeter
 
Back
Top Bottom