Movie Recommendation

Status
Not open for further replies.

CharlieBee

Super Member
I recommend the 2016 documentary movie for all to see.

The number one rated movie this week, in only 1000 theaters and cost only $2.5 million to make.

It is informative, factual, fair and professionally made.

Charlie
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
I recommend the 2016 documentary movie for all to see.


It is informative, factual, fair .

Charlie

Not what I heard and not very likely considering the author of the book/director of the film.
I'm sure Fox News loves it though.
 
All I really need to know about it, summed up in this quote...


"While reviews of the film have been less than glowing — Variety’s Joe Leydon dubbed it a “a cavalcade of conspiracy theories, psycho-politico conjectures and incendiary labeling” — a several big-name conservatives have endorsed the highly-critical look at Obama’s past.
On Friday, Donald Trump tweeted about movie, based on conservative author Dinesh D’Souza’s book “The Roots of Obama’s Rage,” predicting it “will be highest grossing documentary in 2012!!”
Former GOP presidential candidate and Texas Gov. Rick Perry tweeted his endorsement of the film when it opened in his state on July 13."
 
I wonder if there are any others besides me who have actually seen the movie 2016 that could opine?

Charlie

So I take it there is an equal dissection of Mitt Romneys history and plans for the US as well as a comparison of all the other details that run the country?. i'll leave opinon out of it, but even the trailer is pretty blatant.

AK has a sister site called Politicalchat which i'm sure would revel in discussion of this movie. I'm a bit surprised this topic is still around...didn't it get moved from general discussion even?

Donald Trump tweeted about movie, based on conservative author Dinesh D’Souza’s book “The Roots of Obama’s Rage,” predicting it “will be highest grossing documentary in 2012!!”

Donald Trump somehow bankrupted a Casino...I think it's long past when anyone should listen, or care, about what he says anyway.
 
I wonder if there are any others besides me who have actually seen the movie 2016 that could opine?

Charlie

I saw it last weekend. It certainly presented much information that hasn't been seen in the mainstream media.

For those who have not seen it and have no intentions to see it, it contains many interviews with people that have been in the life of the person that is the subject of the movie. I saw very little conjecture in it.

I was familiar with most of the material, but there was some interesting information concerning the subjects stepfather and the time that the subject lived with him.
 
Does it include proof that Romney will actually reach planet Kolob upon his death? Will he get to see the golden plates with the seer stones?
 
See, here's the real problem with this flick. No matter if you have seen it, that hardly factors into the discussion. This film was made for people who are going to vote against Obama, they knew they were not going to vote for him before the movie, and they probably knew four years ago as well. On the other hand, the people who refuse to watch such a movie are well-aware of what it represents, they almost certainly are voting against Romney, and I doubt this would change many minds.

So really, who is this movie for?

Also, I find this whole concept of "Anti-colonialist" pretty intriquing. Wiki links it to "Anti-imperialism"...that's an interesting angle to approach from. Especially interesting in that they call it colonialism, a word many would associate with the beginnings of the US and a sense of freedom, whereas the more accurate term, imperialism has much different connotations. Aren't words cool?

the life of the person that is the subject of the movie.
the subject lived with him.

His name is Obama...it's okay to say it, it's not like anyone is wondering what this is about.

Forgive me for being argumentative if it comes off that way, I maintain my right to be a grump.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom