I`ll take your word, all I know was the audio output SQ as internally decoded by my General Instrument combo digital/analog C/Ku band receiver`s internal DAC was as good as any of my Mc. CD player with the exception of its audio output level, which was a little bit lower in strength when compared through any of my house`s multi room`s systems that I fed with a HQ L/R audio distribution system via my living room`s A/V rack.
And visiting audio repair customers & friends always complimented about the DMX music track selections and SQ quality, and some would ask me what cool radio station was I tuned to !
Later on after enjoying DMX for several yrs. and hearing it all day while I repaired audio equipment, I remember reading in one of the hifi magazines high rating of DMX`s sat. delivered streaming audio very highly, as not being compressed with excellent overall SQ, but I already knew that, and was already in total agreement.
Personally, I've always been sort of mystified why Muzak cover versions upset some people so much. I mean, it's not like the original isn't still around and also after hearing the Muzak cover, it seems like it would make you appreciate the original even more. I do understand more about the repetitive nature of so much of this piped in music, but that's an issue with regular pop & rock music too. As far as myself, if I was in a situation where music was being piped in against my will, I would prefer it to be as unobtrusive as possible, or failing that, music that I don't like, so that it doesn't risk diminishing or "wearing out" songs that I do like from repetition, something which can easily happen from listening to some radio stations too much.I knew it was time to quit when I started humming along to a Muzak version of Prince's "1999". Lol!
Muzak takes the emotion out of the song. "Defangs" it, so to speak.Personally, I've always been sort of mystified why Muzak cover versions upset some people so much. I mean, it's not like the original isn't still around and also after hearing the Muzak cover, it seems like it would make you appreciate the original even more. I do understand more about the repetitive nature of so much of this piped in music, but that's an issue with regular pop & rock music too. As far as myself, if I was in a situation where music was being piped in against my will, I would prefer it to be as unobtrusive as possible, or failing that, music that I don't like, so that it doesn't risk diminishing or "wearing out" songs that I do like from repetition, something which can easily happen from listening to some radio stations too much.
Just speaking for myself, there are times I don't want the emotional involvement that good music, especially, brings. Because of this, it can be distracting in these instances. Sometimes silence can be golden. I would rather engage this music on my own terms, when and where I want. Now, don't take what I said as an endorsement of Muzak. I've always been indifferent to it and don't particularly care for the overall concept of instrumental covers as background music disseminated in a rather corporate fashion. It's just that I've never quite understood why it upsets some people so much.Muzak takes the emotion out of the song. "Defangs" it, so to speak.
To me, generic Montovani is fine for that purpose. Neutered Ramones sounds weird to me.Just speaking for myself, there are times I don't want the emotional involvement that good music, especially, brings. Because of this, it can be distracting in these instances. Sometimes silence can be golden. I would rather engage this music on my own terms, when and where I want. Now, don't take what I said as an endorsement of Muzak. I've always been indifferent to it and don't particularly care for the overall concept of instrumental covers as background music disseminated in a rather corporate fashion. It's just that I've never quite understood why it upsets some people so much.
I had no idea such a thing existed!Neutered Ramones sounds weird to me.
I heard "Beat On The Brat," or some such thing, in instrument-only form. I don't remember it it had violins.I had no idea such a thing existed!![]()

I used to go into Target/KMart/Walmart and switch all the radios on display to the station I happened to be working at. I was a naughty boy.
I had no idea such a thing existed!![]()
They should have "Squeeze My Lemon" in the produce section.Somewhere in my collection is a Muzak version of Whole Lotta Love.
I can sort of understand this.I've found some real surprises: Joe Harnell orchestrating Beatles covers, Ray Conniff and Arthur Fiedler doing disco, and even Benny Goodman sweating out Spinning Wheel and You've Made Me So Very Happy.
Not this though!Somewhere in my collection is a Muzak version of Whole Lotta Love.

I`ll take your word, all I know was the audio output SQ as internally decoded by my General Instrument combo digital/analog C/Ku band receiver`s internal DAC was as good as any of my Mc. CD player with the exception of its audio output level, which was a little bit lower in strength when compared through any of my house`s multi room`s systems that I fed with a HQ L/R audio distribution system via my living room`s A/V rack.
And visiting audio repair customers & friends always complimented about the DMX music track selections and SQ quality, and some would ask me what cool radio station was I tuned to !
Later on after enjoying DMX for several yrs. and hearing it all day while I repaired audio equipment, I remember reading in one of the hifi magazines high rating of DMX`s sat. delivered streaming audio very highly, as not being compressed with excellent overall SQ, but I already knew that, and was already in total agreement.

It's probably more computing power than NASA had to send men to the moon and back.Thought you may appreciate this - this was the origination you were listening to.
View attachment 3277346
A smart phone has thatIt's probably more computing power than NASA had to send men to the moon and back.![]()
Crazy, isn't it?A smart phone has that![]()
It's probably more computing power than NASA had to send men to the moon and back.![]()