• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

MW - I love my underdogs!

Krosya

Well-Known Member
Just like many of us here, I like to seek out and try out different items - be that speakers, tape decks and of course - receivers/amps. Of course, there are Big Boys club members - Pioneer, Sansui, Yamaha...And I have a lot of respect for those, but often some smaller brands are being overlooked. We often see that with Fisher, RadioShack, Sanyo, Toshiba, even Akai and Optonica, yet many of these "lesser" brands are often at least as good or even better than the Big Boys, - sound and built quality. I have proven that to myself time and time again. I have tried Pioneer, Yamaha, Sansui, etc and while they were very good, but I had more issues with them than other brands - talking receivers and amps only now. Having tried several other brands like RS, Optonica, Akai, Optonica and Nikko I am always on a lookout for these types of the underrdogs as to my ear they sound at least as good if not better and proven to be well built and more reliable.
So, here we come to the new addition to my family of vintage receivers:
R0010912.jpg

Small, but heavy and well built, simple yet interestingly enough:
R0010917.jpg

two selections for the TT - not something you see on a budget receiver. I dont know much about it's specs, but I guess its about 15-20 Watts per channel.
R0010916.jpg


And its much bigger brother:

R0010924.jpg

R0010923.jpg

R0010921.jpg

R0010919.jpg

R0010922.jpg

This one is supposed to be 65 watts per channel, but sounds like it may be even more. Both have very good built - comparable to Pioneers, etc.Solid, heavy, well put together with smooth controls, nice knobs, switches, buttons.
Both have great tuner section - better than most of my other receivers, very very good phono stage and produce crazy good soundstage and overall sound is superb - very detailed, clean, less warm than some others, but not as cool as Pioneers. Smaller receiver almost sounds like tubes. I love the fact that larger one has 2 TT inputs AND separate control for the mids - not just lows and highs, plus some other controls as well.
Both had minor issues when I got them, but after some cleaning and minor tweaking - work well now and I think both are keepers. At least for now, unless I find some new toys I like even better.
Bottom line - dont be a snob and dont be afraid to check out some obscure brands as there are many surprises there.
 
Register to hide this ad
I gave one of my sisters the Ward Model 250 in 1976. It's been it constant use every since. The only thing ever touched on it are the controls to operate it, still works like new money.
Not much power, I should've given her the 650. The 250 was $99 at xmas of 76.
 
Been listening to these for a few days - and all I can say is WOW! just incredible sound - puts many big boys to shame. Dont know who made these for the MW, but they did an awesome job! And a little one - model 150 is just amazing! such a beautiful sound! I'm just so happy with these!
 
Very cool! I've never seen any MW stuff and they're impressive looking. Akai (receivers) and Nikko are my underdog brands, and I have a pair of Scott bookshelfs that many would probably relegate to the dump. I've moved several MCS toys through but I wouldn't say they were underdogs as they were so prevalent. Now LXI maybe.
 
I know this is an old thread
But I just got a Montgomery ward 150 receiver
And it is NOT a Harman Kardon receiver or even close
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    315.7 KB · Views: 13
I know this is an old thread
But I just got a Montgomery ward 150 receiver
And it is NOT a Harman Kardon receiver or even close
Hard to believe how aluminum heatsinking was so inexpensive relative to semiconductors at the time. Thick-film hybrid output packs are ok in a cheap receiver, but combining both channels into one was really a cost cutting move
 
Back
Top Bottom