• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

NAD Model 300 repair

Alonia

Member
After a long time where I was no longer active here I would like to throw an interesting project into the room and maybe someone can help me.
Normally I mainly deal with Yamaha devices but for once a NAD Model 300 has found its way onto my desk.;):biggrin:
There was a note on the lid (transistors replaced but no signal) so there has already been a repair attempt that failed... great:idea:
Left channel looks untouched and in the right one you could see changed components at first glance so I took a close look at what has already been done and what else is broken.
MainAmplifierBoard.png
I have marked here what has already been replaced and which defective components I have still found.
The 4 exchanged Toshiba transistors didn't look very original. That's why I decided to exchange all already exchanged components again except for the TR609 transistor (Safety first:angel:).
In the end, a transistor fails because it says 2SC2240, for example, but does not comply with the data in the datasheet...

I have selected the following components as replacement types:
TR604 -> 2SA914 --> KSA1381
TR605 -> 2SC1953 --> KSC 3503

TR606 -> 2SC945 --> KSC2383
TR607 -> 2SA733 --> KSA1013

TR609 -> 2SA762 (The installed transistor looks original, but has been replaced because the letters of the rank? are different [HJ-22 instead of JA-22]).
I have decided to take over the transistor due to the case. In the untouched channel they are both the same rank?, i.e. both are labeled with JA-22.

If i need to replace TR608 and TR609 later i need to make some modifications due to the case:
TR608 -> 2SC1431 --> MJE15028/30 (TO-220)
TR609 -> 2SA762 --> MJE15029/31 (TO-220)

TR610 / TR611 -> 2SD427 --> MJ21196G
TR612 / TR613 -> 2SB557 --> MJ21195G

D604 -> 1S2473 --> 1N4148

MainAmplifierBoardPic.jpg

Now we come to the actual problem:
The first time I switched it on with a current limiter (DBT), I noticed that I had a rising positive voltage at the output of the repaired channel. (+25V)
So I checked the 4 emitter resistors again (although I replaced all 4). So far ok.
Then I checked all diodes again and couldn't find anything.
Regarding the KSC2383 and the KSA1013 I know that they have a much lower fT but that would not explain the error (in my opinion).
Unfortunately I have no MJE15028/30 and MJE15029/31 in my collection of components to rule out that the transistor TR609 is my problem.
I'll check everything again today to see if I've overlooked anything or messed up a transistor, which I don't think because I always check everything 3 times.:bowdown:

The untouched channel does not have this problem and works perfectly.
I wouldn't say that I can't solve this problem, but I thought I'd share this project.
Maybe someone will need it later. :D

Update:
The error was caused by the TR609 transistor. If this thing is a fake, then it's a really good one. I used a pair of Sanken 2SA1859A / 2SC4883A for testing. These have a 3W lower collector dissipation but for testing with a DBT it gave me the result I wanted. What does that tell me... You should remove and change everything that you have not installed yourself. Unless you want to test the parts with a curve tracer. o_O
I will also replace TR606 and TR607 with another pair that has better values.
So, don't buy transistors in the bay or anywhere else, because in the end you could have repaired your amplifier, but it won't work because of stupid errors like the one.
It's better to choose a suitable replacement from Mouser or Digikey if possible.;)
MainAmplifierBoardPic2.jpg
Cheers:beerchug:
Alonia
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
New Update:
I have now plugged both transistors into my "small" CurveTracer (Telequipment CT71) to see what else they do.o_O
It is not suitable for precise measurement because it is not parallax-free but for a quick measurement it's a great thing. So I don't need to fire up the big brother (my Tektronix 576).

On the left (2SA762) and on the right (2SC1431).
CurveTracer01.jpg

Here we have the first (2SA762):
CurveTracer03.jpg

and here the second curve (2SC1431):
CurveTracer02.jpg

Perhaps someone can better describe what we see here, but to put it briefly in a nutshell, it can't work like this... This explains why I had a positive voltage at the output. I haven't had an error like this before...:dunno:
Maybe someone else here can explain it... It would certainly be interesting and maybe I'll learn something new!:idea:
Cheers:beerchug:
Alonia
 
Last edited:
Can’t explain the crazy results at all but Thanks for showing us the CT71!
That’s a nice looking piece of vintage equipment.
 
Can’t explain the crazy results at all but Thanks for showing us the CT71!
That’s a nice looking piece of vintage equipment.
Yes, the CT71 is an interesting piece of measuring equipment. I bought it once to get a better understanding of transistors.

I would say the transistor (2SC1431) behaves like a direct connection. The curves go up much too early (Collector-Emitter breakdown voltage).
Normally the transistor has 110V [V(BR)CEO]
 
Leakage between the collector and base. You could take a good transistor, add a 50k resistor between the collector and base, and you would have similar curves.
 
I am also working on a NAD Model 300. Replaced almost all power transistors in the power amps, lightbulbs and a few dried out caps.
I would advise you strongly to also replace the pots for bias and offset. If the pot for bias opens due to dust or whatever, al lot of current will flow through the output transistors, likely killing them before the fuse goes. The resistor across the pot might limit some, but the idle current will be way too high
 
Back
Top Bottom