• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

NAD PP2 upgrades and M97xe trial and errors. A bad write up, by Me.

Zodia

Super Member
Please bear with me, I tried to write this with my limited vocabulary, as English is my second language.

I am back again with yet another thread about the NAD PP2, and the M97xe.
I find this little pre amp, interesting and a great little pre box.
So i set myself (with the help of Felix) to try and "MOD" this little box, and get it M97xe ready, here is what i found.

Tests were done using an upgraded Technics Sl1200 MK2/M97xe, Nad PP2, Onkyo TX-SR602, Modded Fisher speakers Original Woofer with KLH mid and tweeter, and Dire Straits "Brothers In Arm".

First off, the PP2 is quite capable out of the box, (with one exception, it could do better as far as bass is concerned) but i wanted more from it, so the first order of business was to upgrade the OPamp, so an OPA2134 was put in it, and almost instantly the difference was noticeable, bass, midrange and treble more defined, but not by much (sorry but i don't have any equipment to measure the increase in frequency response, i rely on my ears alone), so i figured, "why not try this, cartridge loading mumbo jumbo i keep hearing about".

After hours of trying to figure out where the darn resistors that i need to replace were, i was about to just give up and leave it be, but then it dawned on me..."Wait a minute, i am looking for a 4 band resistor, but they are all 5 band...DUH!", a victory dance and a pat on the back later, i installed the required resistor needed to get 62K (in this case i didn't have the required 77K resistor, but had a 22K resistor which i soldered in series with the existing 56K to get a close enough value of 63K).

My findings are, there was No change in bass, mids got slightly "brighter" and highs (treble) improved to a level that is audible not only through the headphones but also the speakers, the difference is that noticeable, but not to a point that is not tolerable, it is quite pleasant to the hear.

Then I had a brain storm, why not try without any resistor in place, so i removed both the 22k and 56k resistor, hooked it up and spun the same record.
WOW, that is all i could say.

Now keep in mind that i am not an expert DIY'er, I just like to play around with stuff like this and some times i get the occasional puff of smoke and Bang, But this time all went well, but what happened next got me puzzled, the treble increased tremendously, yet not to a point where it was unbearable, i rather liked it, the only draw back, was that the midrange now was almost gone, vocals, seemed muffled and drowned by the instruments, even some instruments sounded BLAH, the midrange simply got rolled off, I reported this to Felix and he sent me this link, http://www.tnt-audio.com/sorgenti/load_the_magnets_e.html , and that made me go "AHA", so that is the draw back on the M97xe with anything more than 62K, sure, you get the exceptional treble increase, but you do loose the midrange, so back to 62K+- it went.

My conclusion, it is not so much about the phono stage (as far as the M97xe is concerned) but loading the M97xe at 62k, and that is anything but mumbo jumbo, it really works, at 62K the bass, midrange and treble response sound right, the frequency response is even, you get the right amount of mid and treble,

My next quest is to, bypass the electrolytic caps, and try to bypass the subsonic filtering on the PP2 ( that would be the "true" mod on the PP2), I know i can squeeze more bass out of it, maybe even improve the midrange some more :scratch2:.

Other than that, i don't think there is much that can be done to the PP2 that will improve more, but i am going to continue to test it and improve things as i go along (or destroy it trying).



Thank you for reading.
I know most of it doesn't make sense , but hey, I gave it a shot.
 
Register to hide this ad
Hi Zodia,
Doesn't the PP2 use a wall wart supply? I think a better power supply would make a big difference. I like shunt regulators. Last summer I built these two projects and like the result. I've used shunt regulators in the past with opamp based circuits and it always was an improvement for me. I use them with tube circuits, too.

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/analogue-source/129126-simplistic-njfet-riaa.html

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/power-supplies/134801-simplistic-mosfet-hv-shunt-regs.html?highlig=

John
 
Can you post a pic of the innards?

Look to see if you can get the total shunt capacitance to around 250pf, this would entail making sure the two input shunt capacitors are 50pf. Because combined with the turntable interconnects and tonearm wires it should be about right.

Didn't Felix have a schematic of this? He should be able to tell you if they are and which ones to change if there not.

Also what is the brand of electrolytic capacitors installed? If they are cheap chinese ones upgrading them to Panasonic FC's or similar will improve things as well.
 
Like I stated before, i am by far an expert in electronics, and my camera stinks, i got a picture of it before the changes, and yes Felix did provide me with a diagram for the PP2 ( which is basically a PP1 with a MC stage).

nad_pp2.gif IMG_1554.jpg
I know i should have noted all of this, but i don't know what brand caps they are, they are brown that much i know :D.
The wall wart is the supplied wall wart, i have considered a diy regulated PS.

I just realized that I posted the wrong picture, I can be so dense sometimes.
Also the diagram came from someone at the diy forums.
 
Last edited:
This is a great thread for me.
Two weeks ago I upgraded for the 100 miliamp walwart power supply to a regulated stand alone one that offers 2.5 amps. The added bass and mid range was evident to me. Now I want to change out the opamp as Zodia did.
Keep us posted on other upgrades.

Thanks, Al. Wise
 
G'day all. Thanks for detailing your practical experiences Zodia. Yes as I've also found, pushing the resistive input impdance up too far increases the treble but this causes an increasingly large midrange droop.

I've found about 62 k resistive loading is about optimum in producing the best upper treble extension along with the most 'linear' frequency response across the full audio spectrum.

It's a bit of a compromise, but optimising the resistive loading makes a very worthwhile difference (improvement) at least with the 'standard' stylus Shure M97xE. Regards, Felix aka catman.
 
Can any one point me in the right direction, of a good source for capacitors, i tried digikey, but it is a pita to search on there, specially for a noob like me.

Thank you.
 
G'day mate, what 'kind' of capacitors, plastic film (MKT) or electrolytic capacitor types? Regards, Felix aka catman.
 
G'day mate, that should be fine, I use 1 uf but I don't think the value is very critical! Regards, Felix aka catman.
 
Great report Zodia, there's nothing at all wrong with your English, it's perfectly clear and neatly written.

Now, I know from Felix and Broc about capacitive loading with the M97XE, but I wasn't aware that changing the impedance load to something like 62kohms will also enhance the cartridges performance. That's interesting, and perhaps all of this is why I didn't care for my M97XE when I used it, I wasn't hearing close to everything it's capable of!

I also strongly agree with Nerdorama about perhaps building or getting an outboard, quality power supply for the NAD. When it comes to phono preamps, the power supply is critical (the same is true for most hi-fi components, but here especially IMO). I know from experience that a wall wart power supply can be a hindrance to top performance of a component.

BTW I like your avatar, that's my favorite Tool album.
 
It's a bit of a compromise, but optimising the resistive loading makes a very worthwhile difference (improvement) at least with the 'standard' stylus Shure M97xE.

What is your preference for loading with the Jico SAS stylus, Felix?
 
G'day mate, with the Jico SAS stylus for the Shure M97xE, 47 k works beautifully. :thmbsp: :music: Regards, Felix aka catman.
 
Back
Top Bottom