jwrosenthal
Super Member
So I have poo-poo'd Nakamichi's for a while. I hate "name brands" and the undeserved cache' they garner by sheer marketing prowess (think Louis Vuitton, Rolex, Mercedes Benz-at least in the past 15 years). I have felt that the fervor surrounding Nakamichi decks was strictly an offshoot of their dominance during the 70's as "the best" and carried that moniker until the death of tape in the late 90's.
I have 2 Tascam 130 decks that I use at home, and a Sony TC-D5ProII that I use as a desk unit at work, as well as my Sony Walkman for listening on the go. I know these decks sound good...my ears tell me so!
So last week, I was prowling on ebay, and saw a Nakamichi CR-1 for sale with a "make offer" and I offered $25....and got it! I was hesitant as now I had to get the thing and see if it lived up to the hype (yes, I know this was the bottom of their line, and has garnered alot of negative print). Last night, it was was sitting on my doorstep when I got home. I unpacked it this morning and plugged it in on the floor in front of my system. Not wanting to risk a good tape on an untested deck, I pulled an early 80's vintage RCA tape from my collection (Heifetz) selected type I, engaged the Dolby B (as the tape is Dolby encoded), and let it roll. It was silent....as if nothing was playing...then the music came in from nowhere (where's the hiss???). It was dynamic, powerful, detailed, rich. I knew my Tascam's were great at recording, but their playback was less then stellar (recording with Dolby B or C sounds great on my Walkman, but the Tascams sounds dull on playback). After about 20 minutes of perfect play from the CR-1, I went with a Maxell XLII-S I recorded from CD. I selected Type II and engaged Dolby C (which I use to record) and let it go. This was amazing...it was BETTER than the CD as it had the silence and and black backround, but was powerful and rich (unlike a CD). Then I tried a recording I made of my first pressing Stones LP Let it Bleed on Maxell MX-S. This one blew me away...the details were just as dynamic as the LP, and I even heard things on the tape that I never remembered hearing on the LP.
So....this is yet one more nay-sayer saying that I think I am starting to get the Nak thing.
James R.
I have 2 Tascam 130 decks that I use at home, and a Sony TC-D5ProII that I use as a desk unit at work, as well as my Sony Walkman for listening on the go. I know these decks sound good...my ears tell me so!
So last week, I was prowling on ebay, and saw a Nakamichi CR-1 for sale with a "make offer" and I offered $25....and got it! I was hesitant as now I had to get the thing and see if it lived up to the hype (yes, I know this was the bottom of their line, and has garnered alot of negative print). Last night, it was was sitting on my doorstep when I got home. I unpacked it this morning and plugged it in on the floor in front of my system. Not wanting to risk a good tape on an untested deck, I pulled an early 80's vintage RCA tape from my collection (Heifetz) selected type I, engaged the Dolby B (as the tape is Dolby encoded), and let it roll. It was silent....as if nothing was playing...then the music came in from nowhere (where's the hiss???). It was dynamic, powerful, detailed, rich. I knew my Tascam's were great at recording, but their playback was less then stellar (recording with Dolby B or C sounds great on my Walkman, but the Tascams sounds dull on playback). After about 20 minutes of perfect play from the CR-1, I went with a Maxell XLII-S I recorded from CD. I selected Type II and engaged Dolby C (which I use to record) and let it go. This was amazing...it was BETTER than the CD as it had the silence and and black backround, but was powerful and rich (unlike a CD). Then I tried a recording I made of my first pressing Stones LP Let it Bleed on Maxell MX-S. This one blew me away...the details were just as dynamic as the LP, and I even heard things on the tape that I never remembered hearing on the LP.
So....this is yet one more nay-sayer saying that I think I am starting to get the Nak thing.
James R.
Last edited:
).