• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Nakamichi TA-4A in the house

kotofei

permanent gear evolution
Subscriber
I spotted the Nakamichi TA-4A receiver the other week for sale on CL. Since I made up my mind to upgrade to the Denon PMA-900V, I checked the TA-4A references and pedigree mainly out of curiosity. It turns out that it was the TOTL of Nak receivers made 20 years ago (I was interested), that it has 125 or so WPC, high current with the STASIS design eliminating negative feedback as PMA-900V (I was intrigued) and that is has the lazy audiophile’s best friend- remote control (The PMA-900V does not have one). Now I was hooked. After a brief and satisfactory audition with seller’s system, I brought it home in the hope that it will be a good match for my B&W 685.

I hooked it up and spun some record that was on a turntable...VOW! The sound was as good as never before! To characterize this first impression in one word, the sound was ALIVE. I forgot what was the record I played that night, but I remember the impression.

For one thing, the punch was there. I did not turn the volume past 9 o’clock and it was not necessary- it was THE punch that my previous gear (Classe, Pioneer, Yamaha) lacked. The other thing was the bass. The Pioneer also delivered good bass, but I always have an impression that it required a lot of efforts of the olde workhorse SX-780. In contrast, the Nakamichi delivered the bass gently and effortlessly without even touching the bass knob. I got a feeling that the Nak is like a beast in the cage that just tear speakers apart if let free.

I listened to different kind of music since I got the TA-4A and I found that it much surpasses all other receivers/amplifiers that I have or had. Besides the punch and bass, the soundstage acquired the third dimension (needless to say that the 2D soundstage is great). For example, playing the last piece on Santana’s “Inner Secrets” LP B-side, I hear now that some drums are located closer to me that the others.

In compositions where full orchestra is in play, I hear that violins are located as two arches, i.e. violins at the extreme left or right are close to me than those in the middle; this is how violins in a symphonic orchestra are located on the stage, AFAIK.

The Pat Benatar’s vocal in the “Get Nervous” LP was well balanced with other instruments. The Nakamichi did not force it into my ears as Classe often did; this is true for all vocals tested, male or female. The ELO “Time” record sounded just great without getting the last watt out of the Pioneer or turning the Classe at half of its 100 WPC power. The detailing, too, was greatly improved over the Pioneer and probably surpassed that of the Classe.

The FM tuner section is so good that now we listed to it quite often. It’s digital, very sensitive, and –perhaps the most important thing- with just a simple two wires as FM antenna the reception is excellent for all neighboring stations that I found. Other gear required re-positioning of antenna wires to get a good reception for some stations. The FM sound is great too.

If all the Nakamichi STASIS TA 1/2/3/ receivers and SR 1-4 amplifiers sounds as good as my TA-4A, they are really hidden gems.

I don’t know if my TA-4A requires some tune-up or upgrade. However, it’s 20 years old and, judged by scratches on its body and knobs, was not treated as a treasure by its previous owner(s). So it might be a good idea to have it thoroughly checked and tuned-up; any recommendations on the shop?

One thing that I noticed is a slight hiss from the speakers if the volume control is turned to 1 or 2 o’clock. If I turn it all the way to the maximum, the hiss became louder but still not very strong. The hiss is there regardless of the input source. If I use the headphone outlet, the hiss is definitively stronger. Should It be this way or the TA-4A should be dead silent? The other thing is if I bypass the bass and treble regulators with a little switch, I hear a click in the speakers. This click is not strong, but should it be there?

I also have an impression that for the best sound the TA-4A requires some time to warm-up, like 10 or so minutes. However, based on other posts here, this is normal. Anyways, I just listen to the music and have fun. The quest for the best amp is over … at least, for a while?
 
Register to hide this ad
I have a TA-2A 50w/ch. I never turn the volume pass to 11 o'clock. it have powerful in puch. the sound is detailed but sound state not too wide and the image is far laid back compare to Pioneer any SX series. I using them as a preamp to my Kenwood L-07m mono blocks = very happy !!!
 
I bought my TA-2A new in 1989...remember the TA-4A but couldn't come near affording it (the TA-2A retailed for $599 IIRC) and sounds as good today as it did then...while my VRDs are in for a tune up at NOSValves, I hooked the TA-2A up to my Klipschorns...very nice...and you are right about the bass...good one and enjoy!
Bill
 
Nakamichi TA 4A A wonderful find

I found mine on eBay about 7 years ago. It paid $350 plus shipping and it was and still is in good condition. 8/10. The light on the volume control doesn't work and the tuner is not much compared to others I've owned but I didn't buy it to listen to the radio. It replace my monster 250WPC Marantz 2500 receiver and while the Marantz was more than twice the power and in pristine condition, the Nakamichi blew it away in it's clarity and soundstage.
The Nak seem to drive my Vortex Screens effortlessly. It gives a depth to music that the Marantz just didn't have. The Nakamichi isn't as warm sounding but this is probably due to it's ability to give you more of the sound. It is a very detailed sound and much more airy. I don't know if the tuners lack of ability is is typical of all of these models but in that regard the Marantz 2500 was many times better at pulling in a station than any other piece of equipment I've owned, including some very well regarded seperate tuners.
I picked up a Kavent A-210 100WPC tube hybrid integrated amp like new a few years ago fairly cheap and was expecting a big difference between the Nak and it but, to my surprise. The old Nak TA 4A still stands as my main system. The Kavent is no slouch but, despite it's class A output, it isn't quite as airy sounding and lacks some of the bass punch this 20 year old still kicks out. Also the Only noise I've ever heard from any of the controls is a minor clicking from the tone defeat button which was easily cured with aerosol cleaner. My Marantz had to go through a regular cleaning every year or so to keep the static to a minimum and the Kavent is only a few years old but has already needed a little cleaning as well. I don't know of any equipment that has held up like this has. As a integrated amplifier it must be one of the finest pieces ever made. I have thought about upgrading to one of the Krell integrated amps but it would probably be a waste of money. I should send it out for a complete overhaul while they are still doing them but I am afraid if will not come back sounding as good as it still does.
Anyway, I hope that yours is still giving you the same great performance and enjoyment.
 
Congratulations on finding a superior receiver!


I recently picked up a Nak TA-4A, too. The tuner wasn't working but with the help of DIY'ers and AK'ers it now functions, though not quite 100%.

It's 100 watts per channel into 8 ohms sounds great, just a tad thin on the bottom end, though. Hi current with 28A peak. Using a small sub hooked up to the B speakers helps overcome the bass shortfall. Very clean sounding receiver, though it does have a rep for bad solder joints and over half the caps seem to be a little cheap, with the other half being Nichicon Muse, which I left in for now.

The main filter caps are 12,000uf 71 volts. Thinking about replacing them at age 21 but unsure about oversizing them at all. What might work in one receiver might not work in this one. Not sure what the Stasis aspect does, though being a Nelson Pass design makes me feel more confident about it.

Overall I'm quite pleased with the unit, and I found that my spare cable remote control will operate the power and volume (and more). The remote will likely be hard to find and pricey.

HiFi Engine has the SM and brochure.
 
Don't give up on the PMA-900V. I've got a TA-3A and a number of other highly regarded amps and receivers sitting in a closet. They don't come close to the sound of my PMA-900V.
 
I did a partial re-cap of my TA-4A replacing all caps except two big ones in the power supply. Used mostly Nichicon Muse and a few Black Gates in critical locations such as phono stage. The preamp and amp themselves don't have any signal path electrolytes and only one or two as coupling.

The re-capping improved bass, tightening it, and changed presentation in such a way that position of instruments now is more clearly defined. Overall, I think the re-capping was worth it although it was not that easy to do.

I'm planning to replace the two big caps and the power cord; the latter one is IMHO just inadequiate. However, I don't know what to use as a repalcement for power supply caps. They are 12,000 uF 71 V Nichicon CE with four lugs, three for minus and one for plus terminals. The CE line of Nichicon is no longer manufactured. Anyone knows the good substitution?

Anotehr thing I'd need to address is the left channel bias. It should be 20 mV or so according to the SM but it didn't go below 40 mV even if the corresponding 2 kOhm bias pot is at the MAX. I thought that the pot was bad and replaced them with multi-turn Bourns; however, it didn't help. I'll get the 3 KOhm pot for the left channel but this bias problem looks strange.

The remote I use with the TA-4A is one from Nakamichi TA-2A. It operates all of the receiver's functions properly and just have less buttons for inputs than the original TA-4A's. Paid $20 for it a year ago on eBay. Moreover, I connected the Nak LX-3 deck to the remote output of the TA-4A and the deck could also be operated with this remote!





Congratulations on finding a superior receiver!


I recently picked up a Nak TA-4A, too. The tuner wasn't working but with the help of DIY'ers and AK'ers it now functions, though not quite 100%.

It's 100 watts per channel into 8 ohms sounds great, just a tad thin on the bottom end, though. Hi current with 28A peak. Using a small sub hooked up to the B speakers helps overcome the bass shortfall. Very clean sounding receiver, though it does have a rep for bad solder joints and over half the caps seem to be a little cheap, with the other half being Nichicon Muse, which I left in for now.

The main filter caps are 12,000uf 71 volts. Thinking about replacing them at age 21 but unsure about oversizing them at all. What might work in one receiver might not work in this one. Not sure what the Stasis aspect does, though being a Nelson Pass design makes me feel more confident about it.

Overall I'm quite pleased with the unit, and I found that my spare cable remote control will operate the power and volume (and more). The remote will likely be hard to find and pricey.

HiFi Engine has the SM and brochure.
 
wow... old thread. I'm a stereo guy and just picked up a TA-2 tuner amp with the STASIS design. Love it but the volume knob is cracked. Any idea where I can get a replacement (good luck)... also, when I turn the volume / balance there is a ton of static/noise. I'm thinking it just needs a cleaning but I've never done that. Any tips on what to use? Thanks
 
Back
Top Bottom