• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

New to Klipsch

Tapehead47

Addicted Member
I just purchased a pair of Klipsch Fortes. I jumped into a Klipsch thread just a minute ago where I might not have belonged. So I thought I'd start a new thread which may be more relevant. Sorry, just excited about my first purchase of main speakers in over 30 years.

I've never heard klipsch speakers. I only know what I've read about Klipsch. Over 30 years with JBL 4311's has been great. They sound as good now as they did when I bought them. They have exceeded every expectation. The JBL's have never let me down in sound quality and reliability.

But after 30 years I just want to try something new. I'm looking forward to my new friends.

Rick in Lutz, Fl
 
Register to hide this ad
Enjoy the new speakers. Give us a comparison between the Klipsch and JBL sound.

cubdog
 
Hooked up the Fortes last night. First impressions are very positive. I need some time to get used to the sound.

It's Friday! I'll probably be listening into the wee hours.

Rick
 
Do yourself another favor....

....If you don't already have some, go find yourself some tubes, and pump some non-siliconized electrons through your new babies.....Then kick yourself for not buying these items 15 years ago...

I went over to HomerJSimpson's this morning, and played my Scott 345 (7591 based tube receiver) though his Forte I's. Whoever tells you that tubes have no bass hasn't listened to good tubes through quality high efficiency speakers.

My Forte II's also sound great on tubes. Not only do they have fine bass, they tend to mellow out the forwardness of the Klipsch midranges....Borrow some tubes if you have a friend with some and give them a listen...Your ears will thank you...:yes: :music: :banana:
 
After being a ss guy since the beginning of time, I hereby declare that I am on the lookout for tubes. However, I require a dB level of at least 100, preferably 110.

Will a tube preamp/ss amp do justice? Or the other way, for starters.

Rick
 
Tapehead47 said:
After being a ss guy since the beginning of time, I hereby declare that I am on the lookout for tubes. However, I require a dB level of at least 100, preferably 110.

Will a tube preamp/ss amp do justice? Or the other way, for starters.

Rick

Welcome to the madness. You will enjoy Klipsch speakers. A tube preamp/ss amp is a good combo (to my ears anyway as opposed to the other way around). But, all tubes is much better to my ears. 110 dbs? Hey, that's some of my territory (at times). Get this man some stouch push-pull monoblocks such as some modded Mark IIIs or even better - some NOSValves VRDs!!!!
 
wait a second...

...Carl. Back up and 'splain it to me in English. All that jargon goes right over my head! I'm pretty ignorant about tube equipment. I'm venturing out into unknown territory without a map.
I'll need to find out what possibilities there are out there, and then set a target. There's probably millions of options. I need to pick 3 or 4 of them that are achieveable. I'm giving myself about an 8-month time frame (like about Christmas-time) to figure out what I want/need.

Thanks for your enthuiastic input! I'm real excited about my new Klipshes!

Rick
 
Tapehead47 said:
...Carl. Back up and 'splain it to me in English. All that jargon goes right over my head! I'm pretty ignorant about tube equipment. I'm venturing out into unknown territory without a map.
I'll need to find out what possibilities there are out there, and then set a target. There's probably millions of options. I need to pick 3 or 4 of them that are achieveable. I'm giving myself about an 8-month time frame (like about Christmas-time) to figure out what I want/need.

Thanks for your enthuiastic input! I'm real excited about my new Klipshes!

Rick

You are welcome. Ok, I'll put it in English. Klipsch are very efficient speakers. As a result, they don't require many watts to get them loud, and some people enjoy listening to them with lower powered tube amps known as SET (single ended triode)that are usually 1.5 to 8 watt amps. I have heard a few SET amps and enjoyed them - especially in the midrange, but I suspect that your tastes in music/stereo volume-wise are probably similar to mine (quite a bit louder at times) - and the SET amps tend to run out of stream at higher volumes (to my ears - opinions differ).

I prefer push-pull tube amps, and these are amps are generally rated at 30 to 60 watts per channel. Push-pull tube amps tend to have more "balls" than SET amps - and to my ears, do bass tougher and tighter. Plus, headroom (or volume to spare) is nice when you like to crank - at times.

I've run a number of nice push-pull tube amps over the years. Recently, I sold my beloved 1966 Marantz 8B (one of all-time classics - 35 watts per channel) in order to buy a pair of NOSValves VRD, two 60 watt per channel push-pull monoblocs that are my final stop, amp-wise for my Klipschorns. They are smooth as silk all the way up to the insame levels - yet the bass kicks you in the gut. Then again, they typically run about $2700 or so new, and I'm not sure how much you contemplating putting into this. (I shudder when I look at my two racks). I've seen VRDs go used for quite a bit less than that - usually on the Klipsch forum. The "mark IIIs" I referenced are vintage Dynaco Mark IIIs, which are also 60 watt per channel monoblocs - and can be had for under a grand or so.....

Here's what I would do if I were you. I prefer tube separates. To my ears (and some others), the tube pre has a bigger overall effect on the quality of the sound as opposed to the tube amp. So.....start by buying the best tube preamp you can buy. I really love Juicy Music tube preamps (as do many Klipsch fans on the Klipsch forum), and a JM tube Merlin pre can be had new for about $895 new.

http://www.juicymusicaudio.com/webpages/preamplifiers.html JuicyMusic preamps are notoriously cleaner sounding but still smooth and detailed. There are other tube preamp suggestions as well. Some other tube preamps are darker sounding than others, and a tube preamp likes and dislikes are subjective - like much of audio. My best advice is to listen to some units so that you get a taste for the sound.

I would then pair the Merlin (or something similar) with a starter tube amp such as a rebuilt Dynaco Stereo 70 - which can be had nicely for under $500. If you decide to go this route, let me know. I have a Stereo 70 that was rebuilt only about 4 years ago. I'm keeping it as a spare amp but I might be willing to part with it. There are some other options out there other than the 70 for starter tube amps, but it is a good option - and a classic. Check out the tube amp thread over in two-channel over at the other place - and the thread poster started with a 70.

Alternatively, you could always start with a tube integrated tube amp (usually 25 to 35 watts per channel) and a nice rebuilt unit will put you back somewhere about 500-700 bucks, but that also gets your tube preamp and amp in one unit - for a more economical package. Craig, who frequents in here and owns NOSValves, frequently rebuilds tube amps (www.nosvalves.com), and he sometimes has nice integrated for sale that he has rebuilt.

Of course, the above are just thoughts, and depending on what you wanted to spend, I would never discourage you from spending more to go up the ladder. But, it might make sense to get your feet wet first or hear some tube setups so you can judge for yourself. You are always welcome to hear my stuff anytime you are near St. Louis.

If it were me, I would start by adding a tube preamp to your solid state amp. You will hear the biggest difference first that way. Then, by all means, I encourage you to add a tube amp to the mix at some point.

BTW, you'll love your Fortes. One of the most balanced and underrated Klipsch speakers ever.

I've found my musical nirvana. Here's to others finding theirs.
 
Thanks, Carl...I'm digesting all your input now. In order to obtain the Fortes I had to cash in all my chips. At the present time I'm drained of stereo bucks. I'm gonna hit the rack in a minute as it's 1:30am. I'll put it together and reply later today (Saturday).
I really appreciate your detailed advice! I'm detecting good Karma here.

Rick
 
Tapehead47 said:
Thanks, Carl...I'm digesting all your input now. In order to obtain the Fortes I had to cash in all my chips. At the present time I'm drained of stereo bucks. I'm gonna hit the rack in a minute as it's 1:30am. I'll put it together and reply later today (Saturday).
I really appreciate your detailed advice! I'm detecting good Karma here.

Rick

Hell, he even has me contemplating a tube setup...Not trying to hijack, but what about vintage tube receivers? I've heard good things about Mac 1700 or Fisher 400, etc. Carl, you advocated alot of new gear, and some vintage seperates, how are the vintage tube receivers??
 
Consider...

....something like some of the gear I currently play with...

1) Bottlehead Foreplay II/III preamp. Build it yourself if you want the hands on experience... Add a power amp. I've really been enjoying a EL84 based magnavox console pull (9302) cleaned up, recapped, and modded by DingusBoy of AK. He also runs an audio site selling various vintage gear called Black Swamp Audio. Check it out...(No affiliation, just a satisfied customer) The EL84 is a wonderful warm, engaging tube, and this setup cost a grand total of $350 or so...12-15 WPC

2) Harmon Kardon award series of integrateds. I have a H/K A-300, and it gives you preamp/amp in the same box. Saw one go for less than $200 on E-pray recently. It uses 6V6 or 7408 tubes....Also a very nice sounding box...mine ran $150 on CL... 15 WPC

3) Scott receiver...I found a 345 locally for $140 a bit cosmetically challenged
All in one. Paid $50 for a refreshing/alignment. uses 7591 tubes, sounds wonderful with real BASS, 30 WPC....

Deals are out there, you just gotta look and be patient....:thmbsp:
 
Integrated is a good idea. McIntosh! Uh-oh, I'm getting the "I-Wants" again. But like you said, patience pays. I'll find a new home for the extra pair of JBL's I've replaced with the Klipsch. That'll give me some starter money.

Chime right in, Marantzfan! I'm open to all ideas.

Rick
 
Rick, Congrats on your purchase, if you get up Knoxville TN way… lemme know and we’ll set you up with something that’ll really pin your ears back.

110 db’s huh? We can do that with just a fraction over 1 watt on the meter.


Carl… you still toying around coming up this way? You DO know that if you do (or go to Indy) that you WILL be intrigued.

Perhaps you could bring your VRD’s?? :scratch2:
 
Coyotee: I may be in Knoxville sooner than I realized. My lovely sister and her husband family will be moving there this summer....but let's see what happens. It'll be a month or so before I can plan anything.

Thanks for the input

Rick
 
Coytee said:
Rick, Congrats on your purchase, if you get up Knoxville TN way… lemme know and we’ll set you up with something that’ll really pin your ears back.

110 db’s huh? We can do that with just a fraction over 1 watt on the meter.


Carl… you still toying around coming up this way? You DO know that if you do (or go to Indy) that you WILL be intrigued.

Perhaps you could bring your VRD’s?? :scratch2:

Richard, I am still planning on coming your way, but now it won't be until late summer at the earliest. I'm just coming off of vacation tomorrow. Nothing like returning to work after much of the prior week being spent at the beach!! Ugggh. Unfortunately, work is hectic around the time of the Indy gathering so I won't be able to make it. I'm sure that I will be pleased however, when I hear your pair of Jubs. :music: I'm hoping to have Al's extreme slopes in mine by then, and I'm curious to hear the difference between extreme slopes/trachorns/VRDs and your jub top end. And I just might be as able to bring the VRDs......:thmbsp:
 
hmm... just an outlandish thought... as opposed to the VRD's, how easy would it be for you to bring one of your top sections (alone)??

If it's easy to do, we could put it on top of one Jub bin with the 402 on the other side.

I'm still thinking as it might still be an issue on the xover side...then again, we could take the 2 channels from the DX and cross it over at 400 unfiltered to the HF section and let the ES do the job, and form 400 down, let the Jube bin do the job.

No biggie if you don't want or can't schlep that around, just trying to think outside the box and give you some options.

Kind of..."what is a higher priority to you, comparing the HF of a Khorn to the 402, or perhaps VRD's to the 2102" My guess is, the HF comparison might be a better side by side for you and don't worry about the VRD's (though I'd like to hear them)

anyway, no biggie either way.
 
marantzfan said:
Hell, he even has me contemplating a tube setup...Not trying to hijack, but what about vintage tube receivers? I've heard good things about Mac 1700 or Fisher 400, etc. Carl, you advocated alot of new gear, and some vintage seperates, how are the vintage tube receivers??


I guess that I would consider a Mac 1700 a "hybrid" since it has a tube tuner yet a solid state preamp/amp section. Tube receivers are an alternative way to start in tubes to entry separates or integrateds. I've always liked the sound of the Fisher 400, very nice sounding but not exactly neutral. There are deals on Fisher 400s to be had, but if you find a steal, it might also need "refreshing" in the range of $200 or so - so consider that in the mix. A tube tuner I've liked is the Mac MX 110, although I'd also recommend finding one rebuilt. Mac preamps are always highly regarded, but Mac preamps, including the MX 110 were always a little dark and a tad bit rolled off for my tastes - but again, the beauty is with the listeners' ear.

Personally, if one were to consider tube receivers, I would be just as happy myself with a Scott 299 (various letters after) integrated amp that has been nicely rebuilt (or have one freshened). Recently, a real good friend of mine from the Klipsch forum (Sheltie Dave who also posts in here) contributed his Scott 299 for a veteran forum member who wanted to taste tubes and many chipped in to have Craig from NOSValves rebuild it for him. It was a beautiful thing and Oldbuckster loved it. I prefer the sound of the Scotts to those of the two tuners above because they were always more neutral-sounding to my ears - yet still providing much of the benefits of tubes. but again, people hear differently and preferences are always subjective.
 
Back
Top Bottom