No mechanical problems that I've seen.
The only real problem is figuring out which model you're looking at, because, amazingly, Ohm didn't label them! There's just the serial number (which, if we could decode it, might provide some clues), two fake woodgrain colors (plus black), and 2 lines of 3 heights each, so you have to measure them.
The original 1988 Sound Cylinders (the ones I have, with oak or textured black finish) were spec'd in the Jan 1988 Stereo Review test as 31.5". Mine are 31" on the nose. According to the newly updated-in-2013 Ohm website, the SC (1990?) was a single inch (half-inch?) taller at 32", the SCT was 37", and the SCT+ was 42".
The PRO models (150, 200, 250) which could be oak or black, despite what the website says, were 34.5", 39" and 45.5".
They are all uniformly 12" in diameter measured at the perforated "can" at the top. At least mine are. Stereo Review said 11.5".
You literally cannot identify the players without a program... and a tape measure.
Ideally, you want the tallest PRO model, since presumably they'd have the best tweeters and would be tall enough to put those tweeters at ear height. Supposedly they have the best power handling figure as well. Ohm's brochure says they have an "improved" Walsh driver as well, which could mean they're using a polypropylene cone, as in the XO models, but that's only a guess.
They're a worthwhile speaker, but don't pay too much if you have to buy them sound unheard.
.