I got a set of beautiful early-version OLAs with beveled cabs & very light finish & the tweeters without the metal screen, so I assume they are a very early version. Ser #'s are only (2) digits apart!
Anyway, the masonite woofers have been re-foamed and they are in such clean, straight overall condition I bought them (at a good price, I didn't overpay) without listening to them.
But when I put them next to my other OLAs that have also been re-foamed AND had the crossovers "freshened up" and did an A-B comparison, these new ones sounded really harsh (at the same switch setting) compared to my other set, and the base was definitely not as pronounced.
Without knowing anything else about them, could the old, original, non-serviced crossovers cause this poor high/base performance? Like I said, I don't know if the crossovers have been serviced, I only know the woofers have been re-foamed. At the price I got them, it would probably be smart to give them to the same guy who serviced my other pair and then I'd KNOW the overall condition, just wondering if there is something characteristic about these early versions (denoted by the lack of screen over the tweets) that might be part of the audible difference I'm hearing.
Anyway, the masonite woofers have been re-foamed and they are in such clean, straight overall condition I bought them (at a good price, I didn't overpay) without listening to them.
But when I put them next to my other OLAs that have also been re-foamed AND had the crossovers "freshened up" and did an A-B comparison, these new ones sounded really harsh (at the same switch setting) compared to my other set, and the base was definitely not as pronounced.
Without knowing anything else about them, could the old, original, non-serviced crossovers cause this poor high/base performance? Like I said, I don't know if the crossovers have been serviced, I only know the woofers have been re-foamed. At the price I got them, it would probably be smart to give them to the same guy who serviced my other pair and then I'd KNOW the overall condition, just wondering if there is something characteristic about these early versions (denoted by the lack of screen over the tweets) that might be part of the audible difference I'm hearing.

