RunOutGroove
Addicted Member
I'm having my old Marantz 2270 worked on right now (probably getting a few caps replaced) and though I managed to find a tech (the step dad of a friend of mine) who can get to it ASAP (he works out of his house and doesn't have other projects to schedule), it's still going to take longer than I would like and in the mean time I have no stereo system. In light of that, I'm considering buying a cheap (but hopefully halfway decent) amp to use as a spare, while my Marantz is getting worked on.
My criteria: I want to buy local as I don't want to wait for shipping because by that time my amp might be ready anyway... so no point to that. I also want to spend a minimal amount of cash for this as I won't be having the thing hooked up on the regular so I won't be getting much use out of it. I might even sell it at some point later...
I see a couple of options in my area, both for the magic price of $50, but which one would be the preferred model? I like the idea of the more vintage one, but if the newer choice is likely to be better from a sonic perspective, I could be convinced. Both are advertised as working, but I'll be testing them (with an iPod and headphones) before I lay down the money, just to make sure. My choices are a Nikko NR-500 (which certainly looks pretty cool!) and a much more modern, Onkyo TX-8255 (which is a kind of AV receiver, I guess but only 2 channel rather than surround sound, which is what I prefer).
Alternatively, you could just convince me that I don't need this thing and that going without a stereo for a little while could be a kind of character building exercise and that I should save my money and not bother with this thing!
My criteria: I want to buy local as I don't want to wait for shipping because by that time my amp might be ready anyway... so no point to that. I also want to spend a minimal amount of cash for this as I won't be having the thing hooked up on the regular so I won't be getting much use out of it. I might even sell it at some point later...
I see a couple of options in my area, both for the magic price of $50, but which one would be the preferred model? I like the idea of the more vintage one, but if the newer choice is likely to be better from a sonic perspective, I could be convinced. Both are advertised as working, but I'll be testing them (with an iPod and headphones) before I lay down the money, just to make sure. My choices are a Nikko NR-500 (which certainly looks pretty cool!) and a much more modern, Onkyo TX-8255 (which is a kind of AV receiver, I guess but only 2 channel rather than surround sound, which is what I prefer).
Alternatively, you could just convince me that I don't need this thing and that going without a stereo for a little while could be a kind of character building exercise and that I should save my money and not bother with this thing!
Last edited: