• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Pilot 240 using total watts in mono

aaadougford

New Member
I'm wondering if it's possible if I switching to mono that I will push the total of both channels which is 15 X 2 = 30 watts? My goal is to use 2 Pilot 240's in mono, one for each channel. The goal would be to push 60 watts by using 2, 30 watt amps in mono mode. If the concept is right then would I use the center channel to utilize the total 30 watts of the amp?

Thanks
 
Register to hide this ad
Interesting thought, but fraught with problems. For starters, regardless of any advertisements to the contrary, a Pilot 240 is good for 10 watts per channel with both channels operating -- maybe 12 or so each when driven individually. In any event, count each complete amplifier as a 20 watt device rather than 30.

Beyond that however, understand that the center channel output as designed is a "difference" signal, not a summing signal. Therefore, if you adjusted each amplifier with a 240 block to produce the same output level from the same applied signal, there would be no output at the center channel connections. This is as it should be of course because if a true mono signal were applied to both channels of a 240 amplifier operating in conventional stereo mode with a center channel speaker connected, the center channel would produce no output in that scenario. This is because there is no "hole" in the center to fill with a mono signal, which is what the intention of the center channel output was for.

With a stereo signal however, there is a difference signal that can be developed between the channels, so there is an output that appears at the center channel connections in that scenario.

There are two ways that you could do this:

1. Devise a phase inverter to allow a mono signal to drive the two amps within a 240 chassis to be driven out of phase. In this fashion, the center channel output would then develop a summing signal, which is what you would want. The load impedance presented to the center channel output would need to be 8 ohms, where upon about 21 watts RMS would be developed at the output of that "channel".

2. Parallel the output of the two amplifiers within a 240 chassis. This would then yield 2, 4, and 8 ohm output connections, where again, about 21 watts RMS would be developed. This approach (as is the first one really) has many potential problems in that you need the tone, volume, and balance controls to be electrically set exactly the same, so that each channel is carrying exactly one half the load of each channel. That is usually a virtual impossibility to accomplish, meaning that you would need to strap the inputs of the two power amplifiers proper together within each 240 unit, so they would each generate exactly half the power of that channel. In reality, this second approach works after a fashion, but is still a distant second to using an amplifier that can actually generate 20 watts by design.

I hope this helps!

Dave
 
yeah, does seem like a lot of work to make 20 watts. If you can come up with something running p-p 6L6GC tubes for output, you're easily over that per channel output.
 
Woooops! In the common language of the day -- my bad. With the four ohm taps grounded, the center channel output of the 240 is almost certainly a Summing output rather than a difference output as I previously suggested. Therefore, you could either use the center channel output for 21 watts at 8 ohms (with identical mono inputs to both channels), or the second method I suggested (paralleling the outputs), but the first method (phase inverter) would not be appropriate with this type of center output connection. In either case, connecting the inputs of the two power amplifiers proper together would be highly recommended.

Very sorry for the misinformation!

Dave
 
Back
Top Bottom