markallen
Luddite Tendencies
Regarding the previous posts(s) about the length of belt having an effect on the rotational speed of the turntable. Isn't the rotation speed directly proportional to the ratio of the two pulley diameters (and not the length of the belt)? As long as the pulleys are in motion (ie. the belt is acting to couple the two pulleys mechanically), and the motion is steady (constant rotational speed, not accelerating, in which the elasticisty comes into calculations I guess) then I don't think the belt length should have an effect on the rotational speed of the turntable. The belt has to be about the right length so that it makes effective contact, so the pulleys will turn, and so that it doesn't slip. We change belts because they don't grip as well as they did, or because they start to degrade mechanically (break up), not necessarily because they are a little too long or short. Or does my dim and distant memory of rotational dynamics fail me?
Reading other AK postings on this, I was struck with the same impression. I believe you're correct.
I suspect that many of these tables have the 50Hz pulleys installed. They would be bigger by design and therefore drive the platter faster.
I seriously doubt this is the issue. If it were, some AKer would have tried it by now, posted this as the solution, and it wouldn't be a problem anymore. However, since mine HAS the alternate pulley under the platter, I intend to find out.