rotini
Active Member
A non-working but cosmetically good (if not excellent) Pioneer SX 1050 for $150. Owner says he bought it working ~15 years ago, and when taking off and on the cover, suddenly stopped working.
I realize looking at eBay prices this might be considered a deal, even for a non-working unit, but eBay and craigslist have different market values, and deservedly so. I don't want to pick this up just because it's a "good deal" (compared to recent rising prices, at least), but because this is a worthwhile and long-lasting piece. I picked up a SX 950 that was working and in good condition for $100, which seemed to be a better deal (my first recap/bias and now it's a keeper).
Is the SX-1050 significantly better than the SX 950? Do I get more out of the increased headroom and is there an audible difference at similar volume levels? Do you think the SX 1050 can have a place in one audiophile's "journey", when my next step is moving into high-end separates? Should I save my money, or will I always regret not jumping for that upgraded big round toroidal transformer?
I realize looking at eBay prices this might be considered a deal, even for a non-working unit, but eBay and craigslist have different market values, and deservedly so. I don't want to pick this up just because it's a "good deal" (compared to recent rising prices, at least), but because this is a worthwhile and long-lasting piece. I picked up a SX 950 that was working and in good condition for $100, which seemed to be a better deal (my first recap/bias and now it's a keeper).
Is the SX-1050 significantly better than the SX 950? Do I get more out of the increased headroom and is there an audible difference at similar volume levels? Do you think the SX 1050 can have a place in one audiophile's "journey", when my next step is moving into high-end separates? Should I save my money, or will I always regret not jumping for that upgraded big round toroidal transformer?