• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Please help to identify original Tannoy red driver or repeared?

As I remember in the trade, any treatment on a paper cone will make the cone heavier.

Tannoy cones were vacuum pressed and air dried. They could easily vary 1 gram between finished examples.

More important concerns are paper degradation and appearance.
 
Tannoy cones were vacuum pressed and air dried. They could easily vary 1 gram between finished examples.

More important concerns are paper degradation and appearance.

My Tannoys are stored in a dry warehouse, and whilst not as valuable as these, I would presume that humidity/dampness would also affect the weight and hence the sound?

I do remember a particular pair of GRF's (autograph) that we sold in the very early 70's, - fantastic.
 
3300 usd is my limit for now...so i should chose go for SRM 15..or buy this Red 12....
I never have a possibility to compare SRM and Red...but heared that for vocal, jazz RED are better than SRM. Is that true?
 
My Tannoys are stored in a dry warehouse, and whilst not as valuable as these, I would presume that humidity/dampness would also affect the weight and hence the sound?

I do remember a particular pair of GRF's (autograph) that we sold in the very early 70's, - fantastic.

The thing about humidity is they should be effected equally.

Speakers definitely sound different depending on humidity.

Lots of companies used phenolic cones in marine/ high humidity locations.
 
Also for same money I can buy SRM 15 (photo enclosed). Can you give some suggestions how sound of SRM 15 and red 12 will vary?
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    49 KB · Views: 8
Last edited:
You'd probably want to update the crossover on those ceramic-magnet K-series Tannoys. The original design wasn't exactly (or even close to) optimal.
 
Back
Top Bottom