• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

ps audio power plant p300 multiwave (design flaws + post-mortem)

sae-7125

Super Member
if you are not familiar with the brand and/or type of device:
https://www.soundstagenetwork.com/revequip/psaudio_p300.htm

it would appear that the p300 went through some bandaid design rev's after certain serial number thresholds. this particular unit is less than #1000. newer versions show pictures of a cooling fan system vs the eventual doorstop sealed oven staring me in the face. initial thermal design was apparently beyond poor, more like catastrophic. although the grand canyon was not created in a day, so a predictable failure mode will take some time to manifest (outside of warranty).

i wonder what happens when the electrolytics large or small cook sufficiently to cause the outputs to fail? and when the outputs dump all that rail-to-rail dc into whatever is plugged into this thousand dollar device? only time will tell.

this particular unit failed in the field and lived a few years on a shelf. there is a nice youtube video where someone in the uk repaired a unit with blown outputs, it had a cooling fan. one thing he noted was the odd use of kapton tape between the power transistors and the metal heat sink instead of thermal grease and mica voltage isolation (think about it, why its a bad idea). also note the rails of 1800uf 160v electrolytics mounted on top of the output transistor compression bar (seriously?). newer versions show the caps mounted above the main board and in front of the after-thought cooling fan.

p300-1.jpgbottom panel only access.

p300-2.jpg some units had tan/white receptacles.

p300-3.jpgthe electron arena (freq gen board/card/module removed prior to photo shoot).

p300-4.jpg
frequency generator module (note the gold plated edge connection). main board socket looks like tin or a dissimilar metal, gee i wonder why that might be a problem (386/486 30-pin ram modules anyone).

p300-5.jpgdisplay board plus a touch of carbon pcb cancer (prior to cleaning the pcb), bulb is 30v 2watt.

p300-6.jpgcarbon on face plate, whatever failed must have blown through the pcb.

p300-7.jpg
after cleaning the crater, more than traces missing.

there are 2 mps 8599 pnp transistors in parallel for the bulb circuit, both measure 100-200 ohms between pins 1&2 and 20-40 ohms between 2&3 (if i remember correctly).

https://www.mouser.com/datasheet/2/308/1/MPS8099_D-2316102.pdf

the pnp's are rated for 150c and ta= 625mw tc= 1500mw (derate above 25c/77f). if this circuit is driving a bulb load of 2 watts (low precision device/load) something seems potentially problematic (hello math). i had to look up ta vs tc for my own edification.

https://forum.digikey.com/t/ta-vs-tc-vs-tj-ratings/762

its interesting how the display board utilized led tech for the segmented digits and green yellow red indicators but used a 2w space heater for the logo illumination. just because old mcintosh gear used bulbs doesn't mean its a good idea (melted red film comes to mind).

regardless of the design flaws and mediocre build quality (iec plug/switch module + silicone caulk = structural failure when removing mains cord) the device has some potential for dialing in ac mains voltage and frequency. this tar+feathers diagnostic should not be confused with a retort of an irate owner who might pontificate between "avoid ps audio" and the ever popular "ps audio sucks".

i don't own this stuff, just trying to put out the fires and give the local landfill less to eat, that thing needs to go on a diet (the landfill). i should have some baseline thermal photos soon, initial shots show the freq gen card is thermally aggressive and no heat sinks used. no "8 hours at idle" thermal shots yet, seems like this little monster gets warm even when nothing is plugged into it.
 
Register to hide this ad
what is this thing supposed to do, mains supply re-generator I'm guessing? Basically rectify the incoming AC to DC, then turn it back into an accurate 60hz sine at a steady 120v output ?


I'm guesing the Kapton was more about voltage insulation than anything else. Not sure what the thermal transfer properties of that are, but with no grease its not going to be great. Not sure if Kapton has higher voltage ratings than mica does either. I know they do make ceramic insulator pads for high voltage uses.

heat output from this sort of thing does seem likely to be high. Its basically an audio amp capable of a bunch of watts at 60hz constantly. Just looking at it, there doesn't seem to be enough heat sink.
 
its an amplifier monoblock designed to output a specific fixed frequency range along with some marketing hype. it can increase or decrease the mains voltage of whatever device that is plugged into it. depending on power quality of the output design such things can be useful especially for vintage gear designed for 110-115vac. some of the features may help reduce noise throughout the system or make things worse, kind of a toss up requiring experimentation.
 
looks like after 20 minutes (no load(s) connected) from a cold start there are many components reaching 200-250f on the freq gen card, plus other hot spots as well.

therm-1.jpeg
50w halogen test load exercised, plus ~40w idle of solder extractor.

therm-2.jpeg
output component starting to warm up, directly under storage caps. output relay is northern most hot spot (closest to color scale)

therm-3.jpeg
exterior chassis temp for comparison, sorry not a multi hour accumulation (maybe 30min).

therm-4.jpeg
freq gen card, no heat sinks on anything, ps audio standard.

therm-5.jpeg
the space heaters, power plant pulling over 100w with a 50w bulb active. p300 seems to idle (no load) around 35w.

i still need to test the real time wattage meter function on the p300. consistently reading zero even with a 50w bulb and 100w solder extractor connected. more research needed as to what the design norm reaction should be.

all that heat, interior, and zero ventilation. what were they thinking, perhaps electrolytic cap thermal sensitivity does not exist from a ps audio engineering perspective. if this was a tube based preamp (conrad johnson pv-5 comes to mind) or power amp (jolida jd-1000rc, aka rat roaster ) the eventual failure mode would be 100% predictable. the light circuit design issue must be accelerated by the high temp environment although models with the active cooling system still have "bulb failures". no post-mortem from other damaged machines out in the world as of yet to confirm the hypothesis.
 
found another informative link in regards to ps audio company history and when things took a turn.
https://hometheaterhifi.com/volume_6_4/ps-audio-power-plant-300.html

it is amusing to note that ps audio also sells audioquest brand cables. a few points to ponder if your shopping for cables or already own a few pairs.
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/audioquest-caught-in-cable-scam.795911/
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/.../audioquest-wind-high-end-cable-review.17065/

output.jpg
the p300 output looks tolerable on the scope although no-load condition. i do not have a spectrum analyzer nor power quality meter.

cap riser.jpg
to be fair, they at least used some thick nylon washers/spacers to distance the cap banks from the heat engine output transistors.

caps bank.jpg
and it also helps that they used a decent brand of capacitor instead of the ever popular "cheaper than cheap" stuff (hello samwha [rega mira]).
 
frequency generator

R26, 27, 37 & 38 seem to have got a bit hot, too, judging by the discolouration.

That metal-canned xtal next to the 'oscillator chip' looks a bit close, too, and I can see it shorting two pins quite easily.

Then there are the TO-220 devices next to the 3W(?) ceramic resistors.

Overall, it all looks rather cramped, with a lot of hot things too close together.
 
apparently the p300 was the first product sold by ps audio after paul re-acquired the brand after exiting genesis tech.

Screenshot 2023-02-19 at 19-00-04 Product Review.png
quote from the hometheaterhifi.com link above.

i definitely agree, there are more than a few issues with the engineering strategy that was made available to the consumer market. electrolytic capacitors so close to a regulator heat sink that there is physical contact (cap rating 85c, heat sink idle temp +200f). i wonder who specifically designed the p300/600/1200 products? after looking at a p600 photo, no ventilation on top/sides/front/rear maybe a fan in the bottom plate...
 
the pnp's are rated for 150c and ta= 625mw tc= 1500mw (derate above 25c/77f). if this circuit is driving a bulb load of 2 watts (low precision device/load) something seems potentially problematic (hello math).

Are they not operating as a simple, on/off switch?
 
I have one of these that's gone Tango Uniform. I tried it for awhile on my system and after using it there for about a month I noticed no change in the sound quality but did notice some mechanical hum coming from the P300 box. So I set it aside. After taking it out of the system, I again noticed no change in sound quality.

Later I took it to a friend's house to see if it would solve a noise problem - but it did not seem to work. Took it home and plugged a couple of light bulbs in and it ran for awhile and then died. Was thinking it was time for the landfill. Not sure if it's worthing getting it fixed to sell it.
 
Are they not operating as a simple, on/off switch?

when the on/off mechanical switch on the rear panel is "on" the machine is off/standby although the logo light is constantly energized (2w bulb also generates heat). the pnp transistors appear to be configured as a crude voltage regulator being fed by a single diode (half wave rectifier). since there is no schematic available and now several vaporized pcb traces it is difficult to analyze circuit design with 100% certainty, although a few things seem to be obvious like trajectory of traces vs component position.

I have one of these that's gone Tango Uniform.

no doubt due to a charlie foxtrot design methodology involving thermal mismanagement.
 
Back
Top Bottom