...
Heavy weights/clamps can add rotational mass, which might be a benefit for belt driven tables with already heavy platters. but for direct drive tables, this may be a detriment, hindering-straining the motor, and as well, straining the bearings on those motors.
...
It's funny - I always see this as exactly the opposite, but when I think about it, we are both right!
For a belt drive like a Clearaudio Statement, Thorens Reference or any other with a big, massive platter, the added mass of a weight or clamp might be fine; and for a lower-end, modest DD TT, the weight would be added directly to the bearing and might be a detriment. So you are right...
But I usually think of how all those suspended belt-drive systems like the LP12, Ariston, AR, Systemdek and even some Thorens TTs can't handle excess weight; how it over-burdens the suspensions and sometimes the motors. They can only take lightweight clamps, not meaningful weights. Plus the added strain on the belt (increased wow and longer settle-down time) that higher mass causes.
Conversely, the platter on my GT-2000 already weighs 5.8 Kg (that is stock; the gunmetal option is significantly heavier); heavier than the platter on most common belt drives, and its momen of inertia is 1.2 TONS/cm2! You probably couldn't stop it turning with your hand on the side, without removing your fingerprints first, from the friction, so any commercial platter weight is negligible. The bearing on it is well over-engineered (Theophile leaves his on 24/7!) and could withstand a great deal more weight without significant wear. There are many other high-end DD TTs that are almost as robust, and carry heavy weights (including both center weights and rim clamps) with aplomb. Some of the high-end ones even have air bearings, which could probably withstand the weight of a fat Hell's Angel on his Harley before they'd complain!
Whether a bearing can withstand the extra weight without wearing excessively fast depends on the quality of the bearing itself. Belt-drive bearings can wear as fast or faster than DD bearings; it just depends on the particular bearing that the designer/manufacturer decided to use! The fact that the platter on a DD is part of the motor doesn't mean the maker used a more vulnerable bearing, although if one did wear out the bearing in one, replacement/repair would be more problematic than most common belt-drive platter bearings. But on the good DD TTs, the bearings are extremely high-quality, virtually frictionless (some are literally so), and durable, as are some higher-end belt-drive bearings.
So I think it depends on WHICH particular belt-drive or direct-drive TTs you have in mind; one cannot say that one type or the other is better-suited for a center weight, without considering the specific TT.
So we were both right, but with different TTs in mind! :yes:
When in doubt, use a clamp: easily as much coupling force, but without the risk of added weight ... UNLESS you KNOW your TT is okay with the weight, in which case you'll benefit from the additional rotational mass (increased inertial energy), especially from a ring clamp, which adds higher rotational inertia for the same weight, compared with a center weight/clamp.
Incidentally, I use weights (mostly Audio Technica ones, because that is what I have) on all my DD and idler-wheel TTs, and DIY clamps on my belt-drives. Has always seemed the way to do it, for me.