elitopus said:
It changes the VC position while at rest, preloads the cone against the spider, and also limits cone excursion.
See
^^^^ above explaination
^^^^.
You really think you can tell if the foam has been glued to the back or front with your ears?
what difference does it make if the pivot point on the foam is on one side of the thin cone or the other? I'd love to hear a scientific explanation.
As stated the correct foams and how they get installed dictate how that driver will allow the cone to follow it's intended excursion limits,and in many cases when these are refoamed incorrectly the wrong (generic) foams get used as well,and either difference alone can effect how the VC gets positioned,and together things can really end up fubar,so yeah both those situations absolutely can affect the excursion travel,and in some cases it can even allow over-excursion where the cone's voice coil will jump right out of the magnet gap,which absolutely is a bad thing to have happen.
And besides the technical aspects mentioned,to a true JBL fan,the aesthetic situation alone makes it a deal breaker.
Simply put they just dont look "right" any way other than the correct way as JBL did them.
So yeah for some of us JBL fans it can be a real deal breaker.
The presentation factor is absolutely
killed by a faux pas like that.
If one chooses to be cynical about all this,,,then just what importance is there in using orignal drivers at all,,,heck why not just throw any ol' driver in there ???
The thing is once that particular boo-boo is made (incorrect refoam job),the only 100% fix is a full on recone or R&R of the offending drivers with ones that were'nt butchered to begin with,as often the coating/layers on the front of woofer gets damaged while attempting to remove the incorrectly installed foams & glue,and once that happens it'll never be "right" again.
Anyhow,this is a clear sign that the work was done by either:
A. Someone that does'nt give a d@mn about what they were working on -nor- specific details like that.
B. Whoever did the job did'nt know enough about JBL's to understand that what they were doing was wrong.
C. Whoever did the refoam job was just flat out too lazy to do them correctly.
Ask me,,,none of those options would be considered a good sign...
For me it would mean they'd have to be priced accordingly,as I would need to factor in fixing that miscue,and I know it probably wont be a cheap/easy fix either.
Case in point: I've been looking for a pair of 408G woofers for my LX-44,and it's been months since there were any that were suitable,as something like 3 outta 5 of those woofers get refoamed incorrectly as this line of JBL's are a favorite of "flippers" so these often get refoamed incorrectly,and as such those get passed by as SOP.
FWIW
Bret P.