• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Radiodiversity.org

Register to hide this ad
^^^This is a big deal. <bump>

"This means that all internet broadcasters that qualified for revenue-based royalties in 2015 will now have to pay based upon the number of performances. This is calculated based upon the number of tracks played multiplied by the number of listeners to each track, which is then multiplied by the rate of $.0017 per performance.

So, if a station averages Just 100 listeners at any given time and plays an average of 15 tracks an hour, then it has 1500 performances an hour, 36,000 per day, and 13,140,000 performances a year. This adds up to a royalty of $22,338 a year." 1,000 listeners and you're pushing over $200,000/yr. in Performance royalties alone paid to SoundExchange. Compared to $2,000 - $30,000 under the SWA. Small and mid-sized webcasters are in trouble. Goodbye diversity, hello top chart radio.
 
Can anybody find a link to the text of the "Webcaster Settlement Act"? Or a cite to the statute?
 
Can anybody find a link to the text of the "Webcaster Settlement Act"? Or a cite to the statute?
Here's the text.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-bill/2344/text

Yes. It amends section 114 title 17 of the Copyright Act. If you want to get your brain dirty you will need Sec. 117 T 17 to reference the changes.

In a nutshell, it gave authority for third parties (Webcasters and SoundExchange) to negotiate a compromise to the statutory rates set by the CRB. The percent of revenue model is what was achieved.
 
The full text of the most recent CRB decision as yet to be made public. But there was no mention of any "similar authority" language in the summary. So far, SoundExchange is mute on the subject.

This effort is a precursor in the event it requires Congressional intervention...like it did in 2008.
 
Back
Top Bottom