MCM_Fan
AK Subscriber
MCM_Fan,
The SL-1200 is a baby Technics SP series turntable. Built for 18 hour a day use, easily built to be serviced and maintained (not a sealed motor). A trickle down studio machine. That is why I rated it better. And this is not dissing the LAB 440 (itself a very excellent CEC Japan made DD classic). The SL-1200 is fine enough, precision enough, and durable enough you'd never need any other turntable over your lifetime, it is that durable and reliable, and they perform to the highest studio standard in demanding environments.
I did not mean to imply, in any way, that the SL-1200 is not worthy of its legendary status. It has stood the test it time and is basically bullet proof. But, unless you get really lucky at a garage sale on Goodwill, it fetches prices appropriate for such a highly regarded, reliable, well built table.
But the OP wasn't really looking at choosing between an SL-1200 to a LAB 440. He's choosing between an SL-23 and LAB 440. I don't mean to assume, but for normal in home use, a LAB 440 should be plenty reliable, and in the case of the OP and many others, because it commands much lower prices, may be a better value than an SL-1200.
BTW, one of my future projects will be restoring a Rek O Kut B-12H with the huge Ashland motor. This is another heavy duty, commercial table that has stood the test of time. Do I need something with such a huge motor? Probably not. That Ashland looks like it could power a table saw - ok, probably not THAT big, but it's the biggest, most powerful motor I've ever seen on a turntable and probably overkill for my modest needs. Still, I love the looks of that table and I love restoring old things. So, why not? If an SL-1200 fell in my lap for the right price, I'd probably snatch that one up, too.
In the mean time, I'm happily spinning records on my LAB 440 and MCS 6601 every day. They have both proven to be reliable as heck and are very easy to set up and use.
