kevintomb
Well-Known Member
I owned an immaculate pair of Mach II's for a bunch of years. They were an OK speaker. They did not handle anywhere near as much clean power as their size suggested. They were rated at only 40 watts RMS power, 160 watts peak, which for a speaker with a 15" woofer made as recently as these were is kind of laughable and should tell you something about the components used... The tweeters would distort on bass hits at higher volume levels, I'm guessing because they weren't crossed over steeply enough for what they were. The midrange performance was just OK. I replaced them with a pair of B&W DM602s and never looked back. The Mach II was a fun speaker for playing music at moderate levels for backyard parties and such but there are so many better speakers that take up a lot less floor space. I got $250 for my Mach IIs when I sold them about 5 years ago and I thought that was a LOT of money to get for them. I wasn't complaining though. I have read about how great the original pre-ferrofluid cooled Mach I's are but every time I get curious about the Mach I I see that the midrange horn is a tiny plastic bullet stuck in the middle of the speaker and I lose interest.
I hate to say this, but I see NO mention of 40 watts, as you say, but ONLY the 160 watt rating.
And if anything, playing loud was on of their strong points. I think you have judged these quite uh .......not sure how to say it....lol



