• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Rectilinear IIIs

tubed

Lunatic Member
I couldn't resist a CL ad for a pair of "floors speakers".
The pic showed showed some large speakers sporting the recognizable Rectilinear logo.
I'd never heard a pair and for the price of a fish taco I couldn't resist grabbing them.
They're now hooked up to a Rotel 990bx amp and I listening to my local Jazz station.
I'm surprised and impressed a 40 year old speaker can sound so good.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0845.jpg
    IMG_0845.jpg
    78.9 KB · Views: 107
Register to hide this ad
Give 'em a recap and prepare to be floored! :thmbsp:

Dave

There are a ton of threads about which model is which and which capacitor values are correct.

I'm still a bit in the dark as to which model I have, tallboy/single attenuator.

I'd like to replace the black electrolytics, one of which shows a crack.
I assume this is 60uf?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0847.jpg
    IMG_0847.jpg
    82.7 KB · Views: 61
You may have the original design as reviewed by J Hirsch in S.R. Jensen woofers etc and I believe 60MFD caps. Recap all the NPE's.
 
There are a ton of threads about which model is which and which capacitor values are correct.

I'm still a bit in the dark as to which model I have, tallboy/single attenuator.

I'd like to replace the black electrolytics, one of which shows a crack.
I assume this is 60uf?

Is the value not printed on the side? That's not an electrolytic cap, by the way.
 
You may have the original design as reviewed by J Hirsch in S.R. Jensen woofers etc and I believe 60MFD caps. Recap all the NPE's.

They seem to be the originals from the loads of conjecture I can decipher from the net:)
I thought they seemed rather special sounding before I read the review and compared them to my ESL 57s.

http://sportsbil.com/stereo/rectilinear-db/highboy-review-hirsch-12-1967.pdf

Is the value not printed on the side? That's not an electrolytic cap, by the way.

I thought they were Callens electrolytics, because of the look and have read all the caps are mylar/poly on the originals.
No printing is visible and I've not dismantled the crossover to take a peek

These sure sound remarkable.
 
Ah, the debate about the little black cap.

When I did mine, my research, based on the version of the speaker I have, led me to the conclusion that the cap labeled "XMC" was 100mF.

picture.php


picture.php


So that's how I replaced it. Good thing there's plenty of room inside the box:

picture.php


Sure sounds good!
 
I measured mine at 94uF, but I don't know if it drifted. I believe it's some sort of film/mylar cap so drift shouldn't be a big issue, but that's not a certainty.

The larger value cap lets the midrange play a bit lower (around 250 Hz or so depending on Z) not an issue for the Philips.
 
Ah, the debate about the little black cap.

When I did mine, my research, based on the version of the speaker I have, led me to the conclusion that the cap labeled "XMC" was 100mF.

picture.php


picture.php


So that's how I replaced it. Good thing there's plenty of room inside the box:

picture.php


Sure sounds good!

Thanks for the pics, Moonman.
Your diagram shows you have one tone control just as mine, xover looks the same.
As to the black cap, it sure seems a non electrolytic would be comparatively huge even back in 1967.
 
Keep in mind when looking at the size of modern-day film caps that most are rated for much higher voltage than needed for a speaker, often 400v and up. (it looks like the Clarity caps in the pic above are 250V) The original spec caps would were often more along the lines of 50v (still way higher than needed) and hence much smaller than modern-day, high voltage replacements. I haven't had much luck finding modern film caps with lower voltage ratings, for whatever reason. My guess is it's because there is a perception that higher voltage is better (founded upon... well, I don't know what that's founded upon :) )
 
Last edited:
According to this site:

http://sportsbil.com/stereo/rectilinear-db/

60 uF is the correct value.

I agree they sound very good. One of the few vintage speakers that I've found to be worthwhile, IMO. I did a lot of work to mine, but they sounded pretty great before I did anything.

I've been running back and forth listening to the III's in the studio and the Quads 57s set up in the living room.
Very interesting.

I won't make a judgement on what's what with that black cap until I dismantle and examine.
 
Congrats on the speaker find. I recently found a pair as well. I'm in the process of getting them back into operating condition. My larger value capacitor ended up being 60uf, but in my research I have seen both values (60 & ~100). I am excited to finish mine and get a chance to hear them. It is encouraging to hear that you like yours. Thanks for sharing.
 
I couldn't resist a CL ad for a pair of "floors speakers".
The pic showed showed some large speakers sporting the recognizable Rectilinear logo.
I'd never heard a pair and for the price of a fish taco I couldn't resist grabbing them.
They're now hooked up to a Rotel 990bx amp and I listening to my local Jazz station.
I'm surprised and impressed a 40 year old speaker can sound so good.

Oh, don't be so surprised how great "old" speakers can sound.
My 55 year old AR3's are one of my best!

Nice score! I too have not heard them, but would love to some day!

How are the cabs?

Glenn
 
Keep in mind when looking at the size of modern-day film caps that most are rated for much higher voltage than needed for a speaker, often 400v and up. (it looks like the ones in the pic above are 250V) The original spec caps would were often more along the lines of 50v (still way higher than needed) and hence much smaller than modern-day, high voltage replacements. I haven't had much luck finding modern film caps with lower voltage ratings, for whatever reason. My guess is it's because there is a perception that higher voltage is better (founded upon... well, I don't know what that's founded upon :) )

That's a very good point.
Big old film films it will be.
 
Paging Dr. Biggles, Dr. Biggles.....

"Is there a doctor in the house?"

Congrats on the speaker find. I recently found a pair as well. I'm in the process of getting them back into operating condition. My larger value capacitor ended up being 60uf, but in my research I have seen both values (60 & ~100). I am excited to finish mine and get a chance to hear them. It is encouraging to hear that you like yours. Thanks for sharing.

60uf?
Any idea what version yours are?:)

Oh, don't be so surprised how great "old" speakers can sound.
My 55 year old AR3's are one of my best!

Nice score! I too have not heard them, but would love to some day!

How are the cabs?

Glenn

Actually I meant old ones that looked like these:)

The cabs are lovely.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0858.jpg
    IMG_0858.jpg
    74.4 KB · Views: 22
Hey,

OoOoOOoO, III's !!! Oh, I don't have anything much to add. Kirk has got more on the ball here than I do. I'm just a huge enthusiast and love these particular rigs.

My earlier III's have the 100uF cap and the later versions have the 60uF. New caps are necessary with all those tweeters and that nice midrange, you want them at their best.

Congratulations !!!

Biggles

RectilinearII045.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom