• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Sansui QRX-7500 rebuild notes

michael_w

Member
Hi all,
I thought I'd post these extended notes for posterity sake and hope they are of use to someone else that is in the process of rebuilding this type of receiver. I didn't take the time to include every hoop and hurdle. I also note that I'm no expert but I am willing to go down just about every rabbit hole. Apologies in advance if someone finds my approach an anathema (or a bone-headed hack).

One recommendation I have is to make sure you have some good basic analytical tools, a decent desoldering tool (I broke down and bought a Hakko....and, in the end, it was well worth it), and a temperature controlled solder station.

As received most everything tested was working. As per usual the pots were scratchy, there was mild hum and hiss and the tuner alignment had drifted. After almost 50 years there are components that should be replaced. While many of the electrolytic caps tested fine, a small but significant number had values well out of the stated capacitances plus high ESR and loss values (especially those rated at 3.3uf or less). At this point experience suggests that replacing all of them is a good way to avoid piecemeal problems going forward.

In the end I wound up replacing all of the electrolytic caps (on each and every board and often with those having higher ratings). I can't get a straight answer on what caps work best (complaints with respect to Elna Silmic II and Nichicon Muse, among other, are often posted) so I generally default to Nichicon fine gold.
Most of the coupling caps in the audio signal path (both electrolytic and tantalum with capacitances at or below 2.2uF) were replaced with Wima or Panasonic polypropylene equivalents. In two cases (that of the phono and CD-4 decoder boards) there wasn't always physical space on the board to allow for this substitution. Nichicon PW (105 C) and VP (bipolar) caps were used in the power supply board. In all other boards either Nichicon FG (fine gold) or ES (bipolar muse) were typically used (otherwise low ESR audio Nichicon KL or Elna Silmic II were substituted). The two axial caps were replaced using one Sprague and one Vishay cap. For the three main power/filter caps long-life EPCOS caps were used. Transistors known to age badly (e.g., the 2SC1312) were replaced (tone, phono, CD-4 demodulator, SQ matrix boards, driver board) and, where needed, with matched KSC1485 or KSA992 pairs. Sixteen transistors on the driver board were replaced. All told over 50 transistors were exchanged. The trim pots on the driver board were replaced with Bourn cermets. All incandescent lamps (29 in total!) except the tuner dial lamp, were replaced with LEDs. These lamps include a SMD rectifier in their circuit so that there is no annoying 60 Hz flicker.

Specific repair notes:
1. Two of the four AM/FM backlight fuse lamps were intermittent (a known issue with Sansui receivers). This was remedied by remelting the solder on the fuse lamp clip bases. With the LED upgrade the thermal stress on the clip base solder joints should be eliminated.

2. The stereo multiplex portion of the tuner was far out of alignment. You can spend a lot of money on FM alignment components but I have found a number of tricks that will all one to align the FM section on the cheap. A good set of nylon alignment tools is a must. Between a cell phone function generator app, a small USB FM stereo transmitter, good digital scope and handheld DMM there is a lot one can achieve as long as one isn't too concerned with getting the signal level calibrations exactly to spec. Make sure you document the position of the trim pots, trim caps and trim inductors beforehand or there can be real trouble. I do note that I do use a Leader distortion meter to make sure that the alignment process doesn't create problems in the audio quality.

3. Using headphones a 60 Hz hum could easily be heard when the volume was set to a minimum. Oddly it would first decrease to a minimum as the volume was increased and then smoothly increase with volume. With the recap of the power & protection board this issue was eliminated. The board looked as if errors may have been made in its original assembly. Two capacitors did not match the circuit schematic and were underrated, one in its capacitance and one in its voltage and capacitance rating. The aforementioned odd behavior ended when testing the unit after the two proper rated caps were installed (along with a few others). There was also a spurious electrolytic cap mounted which was undocumented in the service manual schematic. Although the reason for its inclusion is unclear it was retained and replaced with a new cap.

4. A small bit of 60 Hz hum on the front left channel, independent of volume, was still present after item 3. After replacing four caps on the driver board and the two main amplifier power caps this issue was resolved.

5. When the burned out CD-4 bulb was replaced with a red LED it was then observed to be always lit. This problem was traced to a fault in the adhoc upgrade patch (a factory original for the QRX-7500A) on the CD-4 demodulator board (which from what I could tell more amplification was needed to adequately drive the original incandescent bulb). With an LED the original circuit, using a KSA992 instead of the 2SC933 (and connecting an 82ohm current limiting resistor to the base lead), worked as desired when tested with a 30 kHz carrier signal. One of the added resistors from the ad-hoc modification was retained so that the CD-4 level pot worked as stated in the nominal 1-10mV range for the 30kHz carrier signal. See the CD-4 test below for full details.

6. Cold solder joints were found which affected the receiver's functioning in a few places.

7. At this point there was more residual circuit hum if the AC plug has particular orientation in the AC socket. The blade which should be plugged into the neutral socket (i.e., the wider one in an ungrounded 2 pin socket) has a small black ring to indicate the proper polarity. Alternatively a polarized plug can be substituted for the original. At minimum volume any residual background hum, through closed ear headphones, was very difficult to discern (and then only on the front channels). This appears to be a design limitation because of the tone board placement. After adding an additional shielding plate over the tone board followed by replacing 16 transistors on the amp driver board this issue seems to be gone altogether.

Here is the link to the list of transistors I look for replacing:
https://audiokarma.org/forums/index...ilure-prone-whatever-and-replacements.731653/

8. SQ dial settings: A true stereo signal is necessary. It is important to note that for the two SQ boards to work properly they require a near perfect 25V output from the power supply board. When first switched on the value is closer to 24.5V and then, over some five minutes, drifts up to 25.00V (+/-.01 V). During the first minute or so the audio behavior of the SQ circuit may change.

The response of the SQ Matrix mode is shown in the Youtube link
(note that the blend resistors have been retained). The simulated test tone sequence is Center Front - Left Front – Center Left – Rear Left – Center Rear – Right Rear – Center Right – Right Front – Center Front
The nominal level read outs (LF/RF/LR/RR) are:
-2/ -2/-18/-18 Center Front
0/-18/-10/-20 Left Front
-4/-17/ -7/-13 Center Left
-8/-20/ -2/-18 Rear Left
-13/-13/ -3/ -3 Center Rear
-20/ -9/-16/ -2 Right Rear
-12/ -6/-15/ -6 Center Right
-18/ 0/-20/-10 Right Front
-2/ -2/-18/-18 Center Front
***In addition it must be noted that the F-2047 Vario Matrix board held some surprises. The service manual schematic does not match the actual physical board circuitry in numerous places and, in addition, the circuit board itself is mismarked in at least two locations (transistor pinouts). I've seen similar problems in other service manuals....caveat emptor.

9.. Offset and bias adjusted to service manual specifications

10. Tuners aligned for improved reception and, in the case of FM, less distortion and much better stereo signal separation. See the above item.

Final notes:

1. All four amplifier stages run at the 16V_rms rating (32 wpc into an 8 ohm load) using a 1kHz test tone. They begin clipping just a bit below 17 V_rms (which doesn't give a lot of headroom). The THD was also measured at 1kHz and all four channels were well below the stated specifications.

2. Both AM and FM tuners work well. The FM tuner has excellent sensitivity and very good selectivity. Note that the left FM stereo signal is a tiny bit stronger than that of the right (discerned using a 1kHz test tone broadcast the difference is just about one unit, presumably 1db, on the audio level meters). This difference was present before servicing the tone board. There are no output pots on the tuner board to allow for additional fine adjustment.

3. Both the front and rear low filter switches exhibit a very slight pop when disengaged.

4. This is apparently a late version of the QRX-7500 as a few of the boards are not included in the service manual but, rather, show up in that of the QRX-7500A.

5. Only the left phono input is configured to respond to a 30kHz quadraphonic carrier signal.

6. One very annoying characteristic in this QRX-7500 is that it only has an FM auto dial setting. Thus a radio station with a modest FM signal strength can generate stereo reception with annoying hiss. To compensate, most receivers allow one to switch to FM mono reception. To enable this function in this Sansui custom wiring has been added which goes from the FM muting off switch to the tuner board. Now, when the FM muting off switch is engaged (i.e., disabling FM muting), the FM tuner now simultaneously switches into FM mono reception.

7. The LED lamp power supply (just a simple transformer tap) is unregulated and so the voltage does vary with the actual number of lamps used. LED luminosity can be very sensitive to small changes in the voltage. Thus some variations are observable when switching the number of lamps that are energized.

8. Some residual scratchiness of the volume pot can be discerned if it is turned quickly to high volume and there is no audio source.

Lighting notes: Getting the lighting to match that of the original proved challenging. The AM/FM tuner display was exceedingly dim even when all the incandescent fuse lamps were working. Both daylight and warm white LEDs were tested and, of the two, daylight lamps worked best. Even then the AM/FM display wasn't quite as bright as I would have preferred (still a big improvement). As a consequence the green of the AM/FM display is a bit purer in its tone and the 0...10....to...100 scale below is a bit more yellow than in the original. The meter displays are much brighter as well but still a fairly close color match. In addition to the backlight every meter also includes two small bulbs (off the field of view) for illuminating the meter needle base when there is no room light. Most of these had burnt out and there was extensive darkening of the surrounding plastic from the heat build up. The LED replacements are a bit more yellow in tone and have been adjusted in brightness so they don't overwhelm the black meter face with unwanted glare. For the two phono LED bulbs, green LEDs were substituted for the standard yellow-amber. With this LED upgrade the maximum power used when in idle drops from something close to 60 watts to between 25 and 27. The reason it is still relatively high (as compared to other receivers) is that all the electronic boards are fully energized when the receiver is on.

CD-4 test notes:
1. Initially a 30kHz pilot signal was found to properly illuminate the CD-4 lamp. Without this lamp being lit the full CD-4 decoder circuit will not function.

Although I do not have a quadraphonic test disc set up it is possible to test the decoder with a CD-4 needle drop .flac recording and a USB sound card with a sufficiently high frequency response. I used an ASUS Xonar U7 MKII which has a 192kHz DAC (and is said to output up to 55kHz, well above the 20-45kHz range employed in CD-4 disc recordings). At first I tried a claimed CD-4 test record recording but that recording did not work as intended. As a result I went to the trouble of fully simulating (using the computer program Partsim which I believe employs Spice as the simulation engine) one channel of the entire CD-4 decoder circuit (except the FM decoder chip) that resides on the CD-4 and phono boards. All of the circuit elements checked out in terms of the DC voltages and AC gain measured at various test points indicating that nothing was amiss. My scope has a built in FFT function which made it easy to see the FM encoded signal before the demodulator chip. Interestingly one of tested subcircuits I prototyped gave bogus results in the simulated transient response. I guess you have to take everything with a small grain of salt. The good news is that even if you don't have the background to look at a circuit diagram and figure out the proper behavior the simulation software goes a long way to ramping one up the learning curve.

2. Thereafter I downloaded a short Marvin Gaye CD-4 recording "Mercy, mercy, me.flac" and this file ran through the decoder just fine. Although the front and rear channels have about the same average signal strength on the Sansui meters, one can look more carefully by directly visualizing the left (or right) front and left rear outputs (accessible on the phono board) on the oscilloscope. The actual scope traces, seen in a Youtube video
(yellow for front and cyan for rear) are significantly different (and indicated by the difference plot in a poorly rendered purple). One can also audibly hear that sound is different (not on the video).

3. There was one important observation. In moving from a stereo to the quadraphonic switch setting there is a noticeable drop in the signal level so that the small level adjust knob needed to be increased (in this case to 10). This is due to an additional line resistor in the audio path on the phono board which drops the level. Adjusting things proved a bit tricky because one also needs to keep from saturating the FM decoder chip (via the CD-4 level knob).

4. Supplement for the user manual. A. CD-4 level knob adjusts the total signal strength, including the 30kHz pilot signal, just before the FM decoder chip. Thus it will also modify the "front-back" signal level. The Left and Right stereo separation knobs adjust the signal level of the respective "front+back" tracks.

That is all for now.

As I said, I hope this helps.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
***In addition it must be noted that the F-2047 Vario Matrix board held some surprises. The service manual schematic does not match the actual physical board circuitry in numerous places and, in addition, the circuit board itself is mismarked in at least two locations (transistor pinouts). I've seen similar problems in other service manuals....caveat emptor.

I was hoping you remember which transistors in specific were not marked correctly? Like an idiot, i did not pay attention to the orientation of the originals and when i replaced them, i now have lost the front left and rear right channels in QS/SQ modes.
 
Hi, October seems like ancient history... I just scanned the QRX-7500 service manual and, from what I can recollect, it seems like I should have said the 2048 board in regards to the schematic not matching the actual board. If my memory is correct there there were mainly problems with the layout and values of the resistors near TR03 and TR04. As for those transistor pin out problems on the boards, I just can't really be sure although I do remember losing the channel outputs as well. Even when one tries to be careful pulling transistors bad things can happen. It is easy to loose the orientation and the replacement transistor pin arrangements may not match those of the original. It turned out that there was a fairly straightforward way to deduce how things should be oriented. Once I settled down I realized all I needed to do was to measure the actual DC offsets at the location of the three pins. For an NPN it needed to be Vc>Vb>Ve regardless of what the circuit board labeling indicated. It was a little bit tedious (I lost count of how many times I pulled out those boards) but that got things back into service.

The other vario matrix board was troublesome as well. I didn't mention it but there was a large soldered in place metal shield. Removing it was not easy even with a desoldering gun. It also needed a fair bit of effort with solder wick as well. There were a modest number of electrolytic caps underneath that needed to be replaced.

Hope this helps.
 
Thanks for the quick reply. As far as you recall, was it a situation where the schematic was right, but the board printing was wrong? Just trying to determine is there is a good reference.
 
If its a 'A' model , the Qrx 5001 has the same decoder boards , manual at Hi fi engine .l recapped a pair , sounds very good even compared to its big brothers .
 
If its a 'A' model , the Qrx 5001 has the same decoder boards , manual at Hi fi engine .l recapped a pair , sounds very good even compared to its big brothers .

Thanks for the heads up. Yes, it is the 7500A. At least for the 2048 board, as far as i can tell, i have everything oriented correctly for what it shows in the 7500A Schematic. I will double check it with the 5100 to make sure. I am going to be looking at the 2084 board next.
 
Hope all goes well , haven't touched the transistors in mine they seem good .
 
As far as you recall, was it a situation where the schematic was right, but the board printing was wrong? Just trying to determine is there is a good reference.

Both had errors. The schematic seemed fine with respect to the transistor layout but, as I noted, the resistor values and their interconnects were different than those depicted in the QRX-7500 service manual I downloaded. Not dramatically different but enough to trip me up as I traced the input signal through the board. Maybe the revised board I rebuilt matches that in a different manual. For the CD-4 board the scan was so poor I mostly relied on a diagram in another QRX manual. The CD-4 documentation is pretty much non existent. (BTW: At that time I used the layout and simulation software from Arrow Electronics. In retrospect it was quite limited. I've transitioned to LTSpice XVII which is far more powerful and runs locally on my desktop. The only down side is that the learning curve is somewhat steeper.) As far as the board was concerned at least two transistor pin outs were mislabeled. As for the others I made sure I tracked the transistor orientation on the board when pulled and then verified the pin outs using a transistor tester. In those cases I didn't carefully check what was on the board because I had already been led astray.

Below is a photo that I took of the rebuilt boards. Maybe that will prove useful. I don't have anything with a close up.
IMG_3383.JPG
 
Last edited:
Both had errors. The schematic seemed fine with respect to the transistor layout but, as I noted, the resistor values and their interconnects were different than those depicted in the QRX-7500 service manual I downloaded. Not dramatically different but enough to trip me up as I traced the input signal through the board. Maybe the revised board I rebuilt matches that in a different manual. For the CD-4 board the scan was so poor I mostly relied on a diagram in another QRX manual. The CD-4 documentation is pretty much non existent. (BTW: At that time I used the layout and simulation software from Arrow Electronics. In retrospect it was quite limited. I've transitioned to LTSpice XVII which is far more powerful and runs locally on my desktop. The only down side is that the learning curve is somewhat steeper.) As far as the board was concerned at least two transistor pin outs were mislabeled. As for the others I made sure I tracked the transistor orientation on the board when pulled and then verified the pin outs using a transistor tester. In those cases I didn't carefully check what was on the board because I had already been led astray.

Below is a photo that I took of the rebuilt boards. Maybe that will prove useful. I don't have anything with a close up.
View attachment 2332876

Thank you SOOOO much for this. I am not sure if the F-2048 board i have has differences between what you are showing, but they look identical. The one thing i am seeing is that all the transistors seems to be facing in the same direction for each section. As pictured, the 4 in the center appear to face to the right (flat side). On the right side the the left three (vertically) seem to face down and the right three face upward. Same orientation in the left section. On mine, i had the top two transistors (in the left and right sections) facing in the opposite direction. I pulled the transistors, tested them to make sure they were ok and put them in the way your picture showed...but unfortunately, it still is not working. In fact, it kind of got worse. I assume you replaced all of the transistors on your boards...did you use the KSC1845 and KSA992 combos?
 
Looking at the original parts that were in this unit, the originals would have had a BCE orientation of pins while the one i put in are reversed....so with that said, i think i had these correct the first time. The screen printing on the 2048 does appear to be accurate according to the schematic. I am at a loss at this point on how to troubleshoot this. I have been through ever part on both vario board and cant find anything wrong. Unless the IC chips are fried...i do know what else to do.

Any help would be most appreciated. To restate the problem i am having....

When switching to any of the vario modes, the only channel that seems to work correctly is the front right. Front left barely puts out any sound. On the rear channels, the back left is seems to be putting out sound, but nothing from back right. Back left is also lower output that front right....but i am not sure what to exactly expect from these modes. I am playing a FM stereo station while testing....but it does the same thing with an aux input.
 
Follow up notes.
I used KSA992 and KSC1845 in the rebuild which is pretty much the defacto standard for tone and related boards in low current applications. There are actually a few comparable transistors which are a little less noisy but they are generally unnecessary. Both these transistors are pretty robust unless you push too much current through them. I've yet to kill one.

What follows is a suggested procedure as a visual assessment or monitoring the outputs from the amplifier are really just too coarse grain in their efficacy (although one does get lucky at times).

For testing and tracing I find sine waves from a function generator far more useful. In this case I would probably default to something like 1 kHz in the left channel and a 1 (or 2) kHz in the right channel (1kHz is needed for testing the consequences of phase behavior). I do have a modest 2-channel function generator but I find a simple cell phone app much more convenient to use. The audio output from the phone I use has almost no harmonic distortion at these frequencies but is limited in the maximum amplitude and linearity with frequency and, to a lesser extent, relative phase. You just follow the signal as it travels along to each of the transistors with a standard point oscilloscope probe. AC coupling is good for assessing the signal and DC coupling for assessing the DC offsets.

I didn't simulate this circuit and my ability to look at a circuit and figure out its exact function is still pretty minimal. Again this is from memory. Basically, the simulated quad magic in the QS circuit is done by the ICs inside the square metal can shield on the left. The preamp output first goes to the F-2048 board and, in the vicinity of TR01 to TR04, this signal split and sent off to the other board which compares the relative frequency dependent amplitude and phase of the left and right channels. A modified signal is sent back to the F-2048 board to bias the front to back amplitudes. (The relative front to back amplitude ratio is limited because of intended crosstalk in the design of the original circuit. There is a site dedicated to rebuilding Sansui receivers that suggests a mod that they can do to eliminate this attribute.)

You can now check the gain at each of the three transistors for the four output channels (LF, LR, RF, RR). In my case things didn't work because two of these transistors weren't installed correctly on the F-2048 board (thus a typo in my original note). Because the board markings were wrong in my case I assumed I had installed these transistors properly. I spent a lot of time looking for problems elsewhere. Once I thought to check the transistor DC offsets then everything fell into place.

It may well be that the problem lies elsewhere in your case. (I don't know if things were working properly before your rebuild.) Controlling the L and R relative amplitudes and phases will allow you to fully follow the signal at each of the four output channels if the problem is in that part of the circuit (assuming all is well elsewhere). It will also allow you to see if the other board is functioning as intended. Hopefully you haven't inadvertently adjusted the variable pots on the board at left because they alter the way the ICs set the front to back audio amplitude. I spent a lot of time looking in the wrong places.
 
So I created a spreadsheet and mapped out all the voltages for all pins for all 16 transistors on F-2048. I also compared to what the schematic says voltages should be (as best as I can as schematic does not have all voltages marked). Keep in mind, the orientation of every transistor is how the screen printing is on the board itself. Based on this, i "think" TR5 and TR8 are backwards. Looking for some concurrence on that. Also, if anyone has one of that is working and would take direct measurements on your unit...i would owe you huge!
Values.jpg
Follow up notes.
I used KSA992 and KSC1845 in the rebuild which is pretty much the defacto standard for tone and related boards in low current applications. There are actually a few comparable transistors which are a little less noisy but they are generally unnecessary. Both these transistors are pretty robust unless you push too much current through them. I've yet to kill one.

What follows is a suggested procedure as a visual assessment or monitoring the outputs from the amplifier are really just too coarse grain in their efficacy (although one does get lucky at times).

For testing and tracing I find sine waves from a function generator far more useful. In this case I would probably default to something like 1 kHz in the left channel and a 1 (or 2) kHz in the right channel (1kHz is needed for testing the consequences of phase behavior). I do have a modest 2-channel function generator but I find a simple cell phone app much more convenient to use. The audio output from the phone I use has almost no harmonic distortion at these frequencies but is limited in the maximum amplitude and linearity with frequency and, to a lesser extent, relative phase. You just follow the signal as it travels along to each of the transistors with a standard point oscilloscope probe. AC coupling is good for assessing the signal and DC coupling for assessing the DC offsets.

I didn't simulate this circuit and my ability to look at a circuit and figure out its exact function is still pretty minimal. Again this is from memory. Basically, the simulated quad magic in the QS circuit is done by the ICs inside the square metal can shield on the left. The preamp output first goes to the F-2048 board and, in the vicinity of TR01 to TR04, this signal split and sent off to the other board which compares the relative frequency dependent amplitude and phase of the left and right channels. A modified signal is sent back to the F-2048 board to bias the front to back amplitudes. (The relative front to back amplitude ratio is limited because of intended crosstalk in the design of the original circuit. There is a site dedicated to rebuilding Sansui receivers that suggests a mod that they can do to eliminate this attribute.)

You can now check the gain at each of the three transistors for the four output channels (LF, LR, RF, RR). In my case things didn't work because two of these transistors weren't installed correctly on the F-2048 board (thus a typo in my original note). Because the board markings were wrong in my case I assumed I had installed these transistors properly. I spent a lot of time looking for problems elsewhere. Once I thought to check the transistor DC offsets then everything fell into place.

It may well be that the problem lies elsewhere in your case. (I don't know if things were working properly before your rebuild.) Controlling the L and R relative amplitudes and phases will allow you to fully follow the signal at each of the four output channels if the problem is in that part of the circuit (assuming all is well elsewhere). It will also allow you to see if the other board is functioning as intended. Hopefully you haven't inadvertently adjusted the variable pots on the board at left because they alter the way the ICs set the front to back audio amplitude. I spent a lot of time looking in the wrong places.


Ok, so i setup a test like you suggested. I fed both channels with a 1Khz sine wave. Using my scope, i see a sine wave at the emitter of TR01-T04, if i disconnect the left channel signal feed, I lose the sign wave at TR01 and 3. Reverse this and i lose it at TR02 and 4. With both left and right channels being fed a sine wave, i get a strong output from front right. i see the sine wave at TR06, TR10 and nothing on TR14. All other transistors so little to no signal. if i disconnect the left channel signal input, not much changes. If i disconnect the right channel signal input, I lose front right and now rear left is strong. Now TR07, 11 show the sine wave and nothing on TR15.
 
I am only looking at your table now and I think something is amiss.
From the circuit diagram in my copy of the service manual:
TR05 2SA726 PNP
TR06 2SC1222 NPN
TR07 2SC1222 NPN
TR08 2SA726 PNP
TR09 2SC1222 NPN
TR10 2SC1222 NPN
TR11 2SC1222 NPN
TR12 2SC1222 NPN
TR13 2SA726 PNP
TR14 2SA726 PNP
TR15 2SA726 PNP
TR16 2SA726 PNP
F-2048a.jpg
but your table has
TR11&12 as PNP
TR13&14 as NPN
although the voltage measurements for these four transistors seem to be consistent with my labeling.
Can you check your table again to make sure of your labeling?
TR05 & 08 also seem a little odd but that will be discussed later.
 
Sorry about the delay, was out of town for the holiday weekend. Yeah, the chart was wrong...copied and pasted incorrectly. This is what it should be...
Values.jpg
 
So, I have been studying the schematic and circuit board itself and I am finding some very odd things going on with TR05. If i am to assume that the schematic is correct....then this is what i am seeing:

The Base of TR05 is supposed to be tied to C09 (2.2uF), R43 (220K) and R39 (100K). Looking at the circuit board, this is accurate.

The Collector of TR05 is supposed to be tied to R51 (6.8K) and R57 (22K). The circuit board shows that it is supposed to be connected to R47 and R55. R47 on the circuit board has a 6.8K resistor in it, but R55 actually has a 15nF mylar cap! Also, i see no reference to a R55 in the schematic at all.

The Emitter of TR05 is supposed to be tied to R47 (6.8K) and C13 (56nF). Well, on the circuit board, it is actually tied to R51 (6.8K) and C13....but in the spot where C13 should be, there is a resistor (22K).

Looking at this, it seems like the 22K resistor sitting in C13's spot and the 56nF cap sitting in R55's spot are backwards. If these components are switched, then the schematic makes senses. The labeling on the board is still off, but the components are correct.

TR08 has the same issue. To sum that one up, R58 and C16 are backwards.

I am completely blown away by all this as I did not touch any resistor or mylar cap on this board. I cannot say with any certainty if someone else did not jack with this, but this probably explains why the voltages on these transistors are off. I guess at this point, i don't have a lot to loose, so I am going to swap these parts around and see what happens.
 
So much for that. No change in behavior. The voltages at the ECB terminals for TR05 and TR08 are still the same. I am totally at a loss here.

For kicks and grins, i checked the voltages at each pin on the two IC's (HD-3103P and HA-1327). Everything seems to check out. I used the 5001 schematic because the 7500A had no voltage references.
 
Welcome back. Before I try to digest your last two posts I want to return to TR05 and TR08. These are PNP transistors and so, if my understanding is correct, to work properly the dc offset voltages should be V_E>V_B>V_C with V_E-V_B typically of order 0.6 V (in silicon). You will notice that TR13 to 16 have that behavior but TR05 and TR08 do not. Looking at a KSA992, from the front and with the pins facing downwards, the pin outs from left to right should be ECB. To me it looks like you would do well to interchange the E and C connections of these two transistors (assuming that the chart you just sent is 100% correct). All the NPN transistors have the same CBE voltage trend (V_C>V_B>V_E).
 
Last edited:
Now this is starting to make a bit more sense. If for whatever reason E and C need to be switched, then the position of the resistors and mylar caps i though were backwards were actually correct to begin with. Will put them back where they were and swap the pins and see what happens. Reporting back soon.
 
Back
Top Bottom