• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

sony ps-2400 info?

TrevorBarten

Well-Known Member
So I won a ps-2400 on an auction site for what I feel is a very fair price. I kinda blind bid so I have only been doing research after winning it. I thought it was a direct drive but it seems to be belt driven. It seems to be missing the anti skate weight. Does anyone know where I can get one of those? Would one used for the sme 3009 and 3012 arms work for example? I tried to look for some info online but couldn't really find much. Is this turntable even any good?
 
Register to hide this ad
So I won a ps-2400 on an auction site for what I feel is a very fair price. I kinda blind bid so I have only been doing research after winning it. I thought it was a direct drive but it seems to be belt driven. It seems to be missing the anti skate weight. Does anyone know where I can get one of those? Would one used for the sme 3009 and 3012 arms work for example? I tried to look for some info online but couldn't really find much. Is this turntable even any good?

Hi,

These all Sony TTs belong to the same family: PS-2300, 2310, 2250, 2251, 2400, 2500.

Some are DD, some are servo Belt Drive (like yours), some are non-servo Belt drive.

I have a 2310 whose tonearm probably uses exactly the same weight. It is aprox 2.4-2.5 grams. I just weighted it with a jewel scale.

Is this turntable even any good?

They are all mediocre sounding, not better than a cheap Rega RP1. You are a lucky guy, this is a very high quality, transciption turntable, never ever sell it. Welcome to the cult of Sony early 70s TTs. Even the 2310, which is the cheapest of the series, is really well built with a big high quality main bearing. I own that one plus two direct drives of the same seires.

The electronics could use a preventive maintenance (i.e. replace power supply capacitors) to make sure the turntable lasts forever.

Edit: If you have a 100V model, please use it at 100V with the appropiate transformer. This would be best for preserving the life of the power supply.
 
Last edited:
I should know; I have one.

Dear Montycat, have you considered making a custom plinth for it? I already ordered manufacture of a heavy plinth for my PS-2500. These sony stock plinths are too hollow for my liking.

Currently i have the 2310, a stock 2251 (with armboard) and a TTS-2500 waiting for its plinth.
 
Dear Montycat, have you considered making a custom plinth for it? I already ordered manufacture of a heavy plinth for my PS-2500. These sony stock plinths are too hollow for my liking.

Currently i have the 2310, a stock 2251 (with armboard) and a TTS-2500 waiting for its plinth.

I have considered it, but also for the ability to have an interchangeable armboard. However, the stock arm is quite good so I decided against going that route.
 
I have considered it, but also for the ability to have an interchangeable armboard. However, the stock arm is quite good so I decided against going that route.

You can also try filling in the plinth with plasticine (plasticlay) or with PVA-based self-hardening clay, the one that kids use in kindergarten.
 
It arrived today and man was it dirty. It was packed decently well but even so the lateral weight had broken off. It took a lot of effort to get the remains out of the tonearm but luckily I succeeded in doing that. It was so full of nicotine that if you had the lid closed you couldn't even see what was inside. Not to mention the cables being black and hard from some type of dirt. I fully disassembled it, cleaned everything, replaced the rubber on the motor standoffs, lubricated the tonearm and re did most of the solder joints. Luckily underneath all that there was a pretty nice condition turntable. See picture attached below. It came equipped with a modern denon headshell (dj style) and one of those audio technica at 3600 carts. Wasn't even heavy enough to properly adjust the tonearm. I still had a few sony headshells laying around but none for this tonearm sadly. Still this is miles better than what it was. Overal I am pretty happy with it now, sounds great. Definitely one of the nice belt driven mechanisms I have seen. I much prefer this motor over the bl-51 and bl-71 for example (bl-51 is the same turntable as the bl-71 except without a tonearm) which is generally a lot more expensive. Such a shame about the lateral weight shaft though. Is there any way I could find a replacement? The weight itself is also missing part of the internal locking mechanism. I managed to recover a spring and a tiny metal ball, but if I can find a new shaft that seems like a very minor issue. The only real upside to this whole ordeal was that the anti skate weight was actually included. Let's hope the seller will agree to atleast a partial refund

DSC_8972.JPG
 
Last edited:
The shipping of these things are half the battle. Enjoy it! This era of Sony 2000 series tables are quite good. :)
 
It arrived today and man was it dirty. It was packed decently well but even so the lateral weight had broken off. It took a lot of effort to get the remains out of the tonearm but luckily I succeeded in doing that. It was so full of nicotine that if you had the lid closed you couldn't even see what was inside. Not to mention the cables being black and hard from some type of dirt. I fully disassembled it, cleaned everything, replaced the rubber on the motor standoffs, lubricated the tonearm and re did most of the solder joints. Luckily underneath all that there was a pretty nice condition turntable. See picture attached below. It came equipped with a modern denon headshell (dj style) and one of those audio technica at 3600 carts. Wasn't even heavy enough to properly adjust the tonearm. I still had a few sony headshells laying around but none for this tonearm sadly. Still this is miles better than what it was. Overal I am pretty happy with it now, sounds great. Definitely one of the nice belt driven mechanisms I have seen. I much prefer this motor over the bl-51 and bl-71 for example (bl-51 is the same turntable as the bl-71 except without a tonearm) which is generally a lot more expensive. Such a shame about the lateral weight shaft though. Is there any way I could find a replacement? The weight itself is also missing part of the internal locking mechanism. I managed to recover a spring and a tiny metal ball, but if I can find a new shaft that seems like a very minor issue. The only real upside to this whole ordeal was that the anti skate weight was actually included. Let's hope the seller will agree to atleast a partial refund

What a beauty!!

The lateral weight will need to be custom tailored to the weight of the heashell and cart, anyways. You should better hack your own.

What's a BL-51 turntable? Which brand?

That tonearm is pretty good but if it was damaged maybe the bearings are not in good shape. Anyways, that TT deserves a better tonearm. I've one Sony paired with a SME 3009/III and another will be paired with a Rega RB303. And yet another one will be paired with a Rega RB101 as soon as I modify that tonearm and as soon as I get to order out a new plinth!
 
What a beauty!!

The lateral weight will need to be custom tailored to the weight of the heashell and cart, anyways. You should better hack your own.

What's a BL-51 turntable? Which brand?

That tonearm is pretty good but if it was damaged maybe the bearings are not in good shape. Anyways, that TT deserves a better tonearm. I've one Sony paired with a SME 3009/III and another will be paired with a Rega RB303. And yet another one will be paired with a Rega RB101 as soon as I modify that tonearm and as soon as I get to order out a new plinth!
Sorry for the late reply! I completely missed your message. I meant the micro seiki bl-51 as that is one of the few belt drives I have actually used for a while. Aside from the thorens decks like the td 125 or 145. As for the bearings I don't know what condition they are in. The arm feels a bit loose and has some play on either side so I assume that wouldn't be a great sign. Should I try tightening the screws, is that even possible on this tonearm? I have been using it for the last few months and to my ears as mentioned earlier it sounds fantastic.
 
Sorry for the late reply! I completely missed your message. I meant the micro seiki bl-51 as that is one of the few belt drives I have actually used for a while. Aside from the thorens decks like the td 125 or 145. As for the bearings I don't know what condition they are in. The arm feels a bit loose and has some play on either side so I assume that wouldn't be a great sign. Should I try tightening the screws, is that even possible on this tonearm? I have been using it for the last few months and to my ears as mentioned earlier it sounds fantastic.

Yes, it should be possible to retighten the bearings but cleaning them beforehand would be good.
 
It's a great turntable. I should know; I have one.

https://audiokarma.org/forums/index.php?threads/sony-ps-2400-it-followed-me-home-mom.434009/

It's a well built and very solid performer. The drive system is very stable and the arm quite high quality. I can weigh my anti-skate weight for you soon.

View attachment 2876190

It's a great turntable. I should know; I have one.

https://audiokarma.org/forums/index.php?threads/sony-ps-2400-it-followed-me-home-mom.434009/

It's a well built and very solid performer. The drive system is very stable and the arm quite high quality. I can weigh my anti-skate weight for you soon.

View attachment 2876190
You know where I can source a belt for the PS-2400?
 
Back
Top Bottom