Marantz 2270
Active Member
While I am relatively young and fortunate to be able to still hear well (for the time being), which means I am speaking speculatively at best here, I have to vehemently disagree with this assertion. Why on Earth would I choose to deny myself hearing sonically-relevant information just because my own frequency sensitivity has aged (or been damaged or whatever)? This doesn't make much sense and even seems quasi-masochistic.
While your audiophile goals may be different than mine, the job of my stereo is to provide me with musical enjoyment, and for most of us that means to reproduce the music as it sounds. However, if my aural perception is such that I need a little assistance, and I can reasonably compensate for that using the myriad of controls available on many sound systems, why would I ever choose not do so? For purity sake? Really? And miss some of the music?
I'm a musician and when the days come that I can't hear the important stuff anymore, I am probably going to be willing to do whatever I can to correct that or compensate for it in some way. And to ignore that my stereo might help me out in that regard is just silly.
+1
I'm in this camp too.