• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Tesla Model S Police Car's Battery Ran Dry During Car Chase

Do I remember correctly that some of the WWII bombers had water injection?
Water injection is an accepted practice to keep combustion temps down (detonation) but as far as burning it, nothing short of actual hydrogen is currently used that I am aware of. Hydrogen is combustible and oxygen is an accelerant so if the atoms can be separated Katie bar the door.
 
The people who said this is impossible are right.

Well a bunch of country boys sure proved them wrong. One of my co-worker's kid had a teacher who disputed it, until she made a miniature version as her high school science project. Blew all the nay-sayers out of the water. Pun intended.
 
The real story is going to be how many months it takes to repair one after even the slightest contact. Tesla’s stranglehold on parts means that it will sit at the body shop for months waiting for new bits after even the slightest pit maneuver.
 
Just for the record, the pursuit was called off for safety reasons, per the department's statement...

"Just before the pursuit ended at 11:13 p.m., the officer driving the Tesla responsibly notified his cover units he was going to have to back out of the pursuit because his battery was running low. Just after they passed the Montague Expressway exit, the suspect drove on the left shoulder of the road to pass a vehicle. At that time, the Fremont Police Sergeant monitoring the pursuit gave orders to terminate to ensure public safety. All three units deactivated their emergency equipment and returned to normal driving conditions."

Although the Tesla was low on juice, all three cars stopped pursuit at the same time. Tesla was able to drive to a recharge station on its own and charge up, as the other gas cars went back to normal patrol.

https://interestingengineering.com/...las-defense-after-misleading-story-goes-viral
 
Last edited:
I'm thinking an engine could run on a mix of fuel and water (hydrogen and oxygen). I say this because 40 years ago we heated our shop with mostly water, it was in a waste oil heater that used transmission fluid, motor oil, varsol, or anything we could get a fire started with. We got the fire in the burner good and hot, and started a water drip, which increased the size of the fire by about a factor of 5. When the drip was too fast, it would extinguish the flame, but the flame would get larger and larger the more water we supplied, until it quenched it.
I've been told many times this was impossible, some by teachers and "science" experts, but it works.
The engine would need to have a very lean fuel mixture, then a precise high pressure "fogger" nozzle to inject water into the cylinder. It would create an extremely hot combustion temperature, so the water would have to be used to cool it immediately after it fires.
I'm no rocket scientist but maybe someone else could perfect it.

Oh and turbochargers work well but need fuel to make the juice.
We had a waste oil / water drip heater at my former place of work.

One of the 'old timers' was showing it to me, and he said it was 'as if' the water itself burned. I was arguing with him, and he said he knew water wouldn't burn but it did.

I never got to see it work, we burned wood the 10 years I was there.

 
Just for the record, the pursuit was called off for safety reasons, per the department's statement...

Never let the facts get in the way of a good story.


As for the water "burning" thing, whats more likely is the steam from the water drip onto the hot burner was causing some of the fuel to atomize which would make it burn faster. Also possible it was adding some cooling to the burner arrangement so it increased the fuel flow or air density or something.
 
Remember when Tesla was planning the battery exchange stations. You would park above a system of some sorts and it would unbolt the battery and slip in a freshly charged one. Would be done in minutes. Was dropped for the super-charger stations. Would have been neat if they perfected it.

I can see it now, the NASCAR BATTERY CUP SERIES. One pit stop for a fresh battery pack per race. One plus would be the noise, or rather the lack of it. You could locate speedways close to or inside most metropolitan areas.
 
I can see it now, the NASCAR BATTERY CUP SERIES. One pit stop for a fresh battery pack per race. One plus would be the noise, or rather the lack of it. You could locate speedways close to or inside most metropolitan areas.

Yet there is already Formula E racing - WAAAAAAY ahead of NASCAR
(Conceived in 2011, begun in 2014 ...)

https://www.fiaformulae.com/

oh, and the Hybrids have been there too
[hear the exact moment this hybrid endurance race car switches from electric to gas]

 
If only they could make a Police car that runs on Donuts,:rflmao:

Truthfully, I think their main snack is Sunflower seeds, based on 30+ years of repairing them and what I find under the seat.
 
As for the water "burning" thing, whats more likely is the steam from the water drip onto the hot burner was causing some of the fuel to atomize which would make it burn faster. Also possible it was adding some cooling to the burner arrangement so it increased the fuel flow or air density or something.

It seems like a good explanation, possibly better combustion with the fuel that is being burned. The amount of fuel was constant, as the pump that feeds the fuel is not adjustable, so I can't see how it burned more fuel.
The one in the video was rather high-tech compared to what we used- an old drywall bucket with a petcock stuck in the bottom. Usually about 30 drips per second was about right, like I mentioned earlier, flame would be shooting out the top of the stove until it got to the point where too much would extinguish it.
 
Back
Top Bottom