I recently stumbled upon an Ebay listing for an STK-0080 Darlington power pack. The seller provided this image to prove the module as being good. I had no idea these could be tested with a transistor/semiconductor checker. Is this a valid testing method for STK modules?
View attachment 1739742
Given the rarity and uncertainty of finding an OEM STK module, I've resigned myself to the fact that the replacements I purchase are likely going to be non-OEM, which I'm fine with. I have a few receivers with replaced STK modules and they've all worked just fine. For my own listening purposes, I don't turn the volume up on any of my receivers past the 10 o'clock position and I think under-driving them is beneficial to their lifespan.I don't know the specifics of the test method but, regardless, if it is the module itself you are interested in the odds are high (some may opine nearly certain) it is fake/counterfeit; regardless that a test may show functionality.
The fakes may "work"...for a while, but are not nearly as durable or reliable as the originals.
Thanks for the info! I know I've discovered at least one bad STK that had pins 2 & 3 shorted together. Oddly-enough, some of the resistance measurements I had taken between various pins of known good STKs wouldn't compare exactly with the same resistance check done on other known good STKs of the same type. There weren't in huge differences in resistance measurements between one STK and another, but it was enough to make me wonder why there was a variance between them.That test being done in the picture seems strange. I don't see how pin 2 to pin 8 and pin 9 will show up as a transistor junction as shown.
The only test I do on chips like that is a quick ohm check between pin 2 and 3, as well pins 8 to 9. Usually those pin pairs show a short in a failed STK. In fact those 2 sets of pins are good checks on most single channel STK hybrids as they are checking the E to C junction for the NPN side output as well as the PNP side output of those chips, whick is where 1 usually shorts in a failed STK.
See attached sheet that shows pin outs on many STK's
Glad to hear from you! I was kinda hoping the seller of that STK module would also be here on AK. I did some poking around here, but didn't find anything about using a transistor checker on an STK module, so I was wondering if it was a valid test. I had a look at your RS-2010 rebuild thread - nice job. The RS-2010s are great-looking receivers and I would like to try replacing the STK modules with the discrete component kit some time. I've gone so far as to re-mill the surfaces of the heat sinks for better contact between them and the STKs since the heat sinks seem to warp over time.That is my pack... it works.
100% original
https://audiokarma.org/forums/index.php?threads/project-fisher-rs-2010.855391/
Do yourself a favor and build the modules... the bones of the RS-2010 deserves it.
While it could happen, I doubt that Both IC's have failed the same way. Feel free to send me a PM if you need more help. I wouldnt just swap out thos 2 STK's. You need to test to see if they are indeed bad.the checkout of pin 2 and 3, as well as 8 and 9 refers to STK0050 type STKs. Your STK078 are different.
Fot the STK078
Power off and unplug the receiver
To check for a short measure between pin 7 and 8, then check pin 7 to pin 9, usimg an ohm meter. If either of these checks show low resistance, the hybrid IC is bad. Of course checking for shorts using an ohm meter requires the unit to be off and unplugged.
If those ohm readings are OK (should be very high if not open/overload), then you could have another problem.
Power on the unit and Check for +24v on pin 8, and -24vdc at pin 6. If either is missing, you may have a power supply problem like bad diodes.
If OK then unplug the unit and check These 4 resistors near those 2 hybrids. R753, R752, R853, R852. use an ohm meter and verify that each measures 100 ohms. They are usually fusable types that can open.
Good luck

That's the plan, have to do more disassembly to get a view.Something may have been spilled into/on the unit in question. Look for residue on circuit boards & such inside.
So the high ohms is telling me those transistors aren't open?Testing pins 7/8 and 7/9 tests TR12 and TR10 (see equivalent circuit in datasheet)
Some additional tests you can run are,
Pin 9(red) Pin 7(blk) tests TR10be expect xxxohms
Pin 9(blk) Pin 7(red) tests TR10be expect OL
Pin 6(red) Pin 7(blk) tests TR13ce expect OL
Pin 6(blk) Pin 7(red) tests TR11ce, TR13ce expect OL
Pin 5(blk) Pin 7(red) tests D5, TR11be expect xxxxohms
Pin 0(red) Pin 9(blk) tests TR6ce expect OL
Yeah and also not short.So the high ohms is telling me those transistors aren't open?
I wouldn't worry about the 7 extra volts on 6 and 8. But I am concerned about what may have leaked. (possibly bad primary filter cap). This can easily cause a hum, but not sure if it will produce -28v at the output. As another check set your voltmeter for AC and check pins 6 and 8. See if you have sizable AC on either pin. If you do, one of your primary Filter caps is open.So the high ohms is telling me those transistors aren't open?
What does the 7 extra volts at pin 6 & 8 tell? me