Mart Mccall
Well-Known Member
Not the first time I see you say this. I'm still not sure why you do?My friends,
I would tell you I think the 1970s were AWESOME (although I wasn't there myself) for music, but not so much for the "equipment".Sure enough, some, a very small percentage, of the equipment was really good even by current standards. Most of the equipment that is so beloved by many here, was when critically viewed, not that great.
If we exclude the really cheap equipment which is around in every decade, by 1977 or so all amplifiers were transparent to the source, the best turntable motor units were better than they needed to be, likewise tuners, and there were some excellent loudspeakers such as the Yamaha NS1000M.
Other than digital audio the gains have been small and incremental since then. Amps are better in terms of spec but they were already better than our hearing abilities required by the mid 1970s. If you buy a vintage unit now it may have drifted off a bit over 50 years enough to degrade its sound, but when new you would not tell it apart from anything made today.
I know it seems a long time ago if you weren't even born then - it does to me and I was there! But it wasn't some primitive era where we were still banging the rocks together to make fire. Home audio was a big market and that funded a lot of R&D. Especially in Japan but also by Philips and Bang & Olufsen. Much more than happens now.
Sure you will still get manufacturers claiming they have done years of research on their 'better mousetrap' but these days it's just marketing spiel. It was all done for them already - in the 1970s.
