I've swapped the SR-9000G with a Yammie R-9 I have playing through some EPI 100s, that Gordon W refoamed, and the difference is rather surprising.
I never faulted the R-9's performance, impeccable in every respect.
However, the SR-9000G, although rated at only 5 wpc more (130 wpc vs. 125 wpc) sounds significantly more powerful. With the tone controls on flat, the bass is noticiably deeper. Even on FM signals! And, I've never heard the EPI 100s produce such nice clean highs with any other receiver.
Of course once the Volume on the SR-9000G goes past 10 o'clock the EPIs start to lose their composure and appear to be "at risk". However, as the proud current owner of 15 TOTL Marantz Receivers, including the very first one, I can honestly say the SR-9000G is certainly among their best and now I understand why my German friend, Nico, spoke so highly of it. Geez, this thing sounds SWEET!!! What do you think, Matty?
Needless to say, the R-9 will probably be in the closet for a while. Although the SR-9000G is clearly not as well built is its ancestors, it is pretty amanzing to me how Marantz was able to cut costs, maintain the "Marantz Sound" and inprove performance and realiability. Job well done.
-- Chris