• Check out the Annual AK Secret Santa exchange Program, signup before November 23rd in the AK Charities & Christmas forum!

To the Technics bashers...

Man, what a long string!

I was using a Technics SA-200 until I gave it to my son. Then I recently picked up two Technics amps, an SU-Z1 and an SU-Z25. The Z25 is really bare-bones (no meters, just a few outputs), and only about 25-30 watts. But after I cleaned it up, I compared it with my Harman Kardon 350i, and was surprised at what an impressive little performer it was. It had a lot more punch than the HK, a brighter and more vivid sound. I'm not saying it was better or worse than the HK, which I have always liked. Maybe it was just a better match for those particular speakers. But its clarity and performance were not what one would associate with "low-end".

I can't wait to get the Z-1 up and running.
 
Got my SU-V76 integrated amp back in the vintage system. Santana's Supernatural is sounding pretty good on a pair of 1972 Large Advents right now. "Super Bass" switch is on. Don't know anything about their "New Class A" circuits, but I'm happy with the sound.
 
Got my SU-V76 integrated amp back in the vintage system. Santana's Supernatural is sounding pretty good on a pair of 1972 Large Advents right now. "Super Bass" switch is on. Don't know anything about their "New Class A" circuits, but I'm happy with the sound.

I have had an SU-V75 for 24 years now that has worked like a charm. I've only ever had to replace the power switch on it. I am the original owner
 
Man, what a long string!

I was using a Technics SA-200 until I gave it to my son. Then I recently picked up two Technics amps, an SU-Z1 and an SU-Z25. The Z25 is really bare-bones (no meters, just a few outputs), and only about 25-30 watts. But after I cleaned it up, I compared it with my Harman Kardon 350i, and was surprised at what an impressive little performer it was. It had a lot more punch than the HK, a brighter and more vivid sound. I'm not saying it was better or worse than the HK, which I have always liked. Maybe it was just a better match for those particular speakers. But its clarity and performance were not what one would associate with "low-end".

I can't wait to get the Z-1 up and running.

BTW, the SU-Z25 is not a 30W amp, but 80W at ease per chanel, maximum power consumption on my unit (euro 220v) is 260W according to the rear panel.
Could get a maximum 90 to 100W (4 ohm) / chanel.
 
Technics Haters? Not here!

I guess I've lead a sheltered life, I didn't know there were any Technics bashers out there, at least, not any numbers worth considering. I have been a Technics fan since 1978 when I was stationed with the USAF in W. Germany in 1978.

I was at Ramstein AB and they had an awesome audio-photo club on base. I intitially was considering the more mainstream companies such as Pioneer and looked very hard at Marantz, Carver and some of the other higher end brands. At one point, I figured I would have to go with several brands in order to get the best I could afford. It was at this point I also started looking at Technics. The harder I looked, the more I realized Technics had the most bang for the buck. for an open reel, while looking at mainly Pioneer RT-909, Revox and Teac, I quickly found Technics had exactly what I wanted in the RS-1700. The same was true for turntables and I found I didn't need to buy different brands since Technics had the best specs by a wide margin in their price range. In fact, I'd have to double my money to find another competitive brand.

With my components now selected (Technics Pro Series System), it was on to the speakers. Again, initially it was Pioneer but quickly changed to JBL and Klipsch. I decided on buying a pair of Technics SB-6000A's since I couldn't afford the Klipsch Cornwall's or LaScala's at the time, to go with a Technics SA-5770 receiver and a Technics SL-1310MKII turntable. I really liked the look of the dark green, military type of look Technics had to offer and the 5770 was a great way to start off while I built my main system. On a meager income of a air Force Airman, it took a little over a year to put the main system together.

After all the dust settled, I not so surprisingly ended up with all Technics:
SL-1310MKII Turntable
SH-905ST Audio Rack
SH-4060 Audio Timer
RS-1700 Open Reel with several accessories
RS-M85 Cassette Deck
ST-9030 Tuner
SH-9010 EQ
SU-9070 Pre-Amp
SH-9020 Meter Unit
SE-9060 Amp
SB-E100 Loudspeakers. I sold the SB-6000's to a friend finance an upgrade to these.

I never lost my lust for Klipsch and bought a pair of Klipschorns, a pair of La Scala's, a pair of Cornwalls and a pair of KG-2's over the years. I later traded the Klipschorns for another pair of LaScala's plus cash. After all these years, I finally did an A/B comparison between the La Scala's and the SB-E100's, out of neccessity, earlier this year. I could not get the La Scala's to perform in our home theater as they had in our family room. I brought the SB-E100's in just to see how they would do in the same setting and was AMAZED that they blew away the La Scala's with realistic tight bass and simply wonderful highs. I have always been a fan of Technics components but, when it came to speakers, Klipsch is where my heart was. That is, until I made a side by side comparison. I'm about to sell one pair of the La Scala's and the Cornwalls. The Technics 6060's will replace the La Scala's and the 5000's will replace the Cornwalls. This isn't because these particular speakers will outperform the Klipsch but because I now have too many speakers. The Technics will peform nicely and the Klipsch will bring considerably more money while I thin the herd. The Techncis hater can have the Klipsch, and they'll never know what they're missing. That is better for me since it will keep prices down on Technics. It would be sad if I was a seller but I'm a buyer when it comes to Technics, the haters can have the other brands.

What say you?
 
...On AK and elsewhere (although AK is king) Technics seems to have fallen victim to this phenomenon...

Towerguy said:
What say you?

I just finished reading this whole damned thread.

My only concern is the initial erroneous statement, from a guy pimping Technics (no issue) nearly three years ago before disappearing sometime back, who -- then -- uses a Pioneer logo for his icon. :scratch2:

But, hey, "I'm grumpy these days."
 
If I understand you correctly, your point is that there isn't any notable Technics bashing, and that the OP was bloviating. If that's it in a nutshell, I agree wholeheartedly. Certainly there is plenty of Bose bashing, and BPC bashing and all sorts of sharing of negative opinions. But the OP seemed to think that the lack of a lot of traffic about Technics was the result of some conspiracy, rather than the lack of a dedicated coterie of enthusiasts. Well the thread clearly has created that coterie, but I wish the thread name would be put to rest -- it makes everyone sound like a whiny victim. Which is an odd situation for fans of a company that makes the dominant turntable in the entire world...
 
The SL-1200MkII, safe to say the most successful TT ever made? (Love mine)

Had a pair of SE-9060 amps and used them as mono blocks. Beautifully made inside and out less the speaker terminals. Had the matching tuner as well.... kinda wish I had the tuner but I prefer the sound my Onkyo over the Tech amps.
 
I don't know how much Technics bashing goes on here, but at one point or another every brand ends up getting bashed by someone.
As with every brand there are great models and bad ones. You also have to account for personal preferences. What music to one person's ears is ear grating noise to another's.
I think Technics made a couple of fabulous receivers back in the day. (Today's Technics isn't so hot with the exception of a few professional DJ TTs or what have you, That said though a lot of brands have lost their consistency over the years in the name of quick profit which is a shame).
Technics also made a "Dragon Killer" tape deck. (Refering to the Nakamichi Dragon. Again though that in no way means the Nak Dragon is garbage, quite the opposite).
I can't quote model numbers due to memory issues, but I've seen a couple of vintage Technics units I would not mind owning at all. Same with many other brands.
 
Technics also made a "Dragon Killer" tape deck.
Nope, they even made TWO!

RS-M95:
technics-rs-m95_8960.jpg


RS-9900:
Technics-RS9900-Side-25cm.jpg

:ntwrthy:
 
Well there ya go. I wouldn't mind if either an RS-M95 or an actual Naka Dragon found it's way to my digs indeed! :)
Technically, they're competitive (the Dragon might be a bit better). I'm really Technics-biased though, and I would definitely prefer the M95 just because of the looks – the Dragon is in my opinion one of the ugliest devices ever made.
 
I just picked up a Technics SA 3036 at Goodwill tonight. I really like the color at night of the red, yellow, blue, and green. Everything works and it sounds nice for a midfi system. 47 WPC Got it for $29.00 This is my first post to this forum. I goggled the model in the store and found this page which helped me decide to but it. I like it way more then I thought I would, especially the color at night. It is my bedroom receiver. I thought it might look 80's cheesy but it looks fun! I think I am going to start looking for early 80's stuff as a lot of the 70's stuff is getting snatched up, no doubt partly due to this excellent forum! Thanks for being here, you have helped me make a few decisions through the past few weeks.

Bob J.
 
I never noticed any anti-Technics sentiment here since finding AK. I definitely don't share the feeling, either way. I love my two cassette decks and the speakers are decent.
 
I have and still enjoy all my Technics CD players and Turntables . I find that the CD players are by far the most Human friendly units around .
 
Technically, they're competitive (the Dragon might be a bit better). I'm really Technics-biased though, and I would definitely prefer the M95 just because of the looks – the Dragon is in my opinion one of the ugliest devices ever made.
Nice pun! :banana:
 
Back
Top Bottom