The flip side to "book time" is that you can get paid for 2 hours of work in an 8 hour day if things go wrong. I guess it averages out sometimes. I have a stack of paper manuals for my Continental. Its got air suspension that most people find to be a complete mystery and a diesel engine that is alien even to me so I go to the manuals fairly often. Unfortunately Ford only made it for one year and there are gaps in the manuals, and some spots where it just says "service procedures not available at this time". Nothing like having to fumble your way through fixing something when even the people who made it can't tell you how.
Yes - I think it also causes mechanics to take shortcuts, and sometimes shortcuts are not good!!! On the other hand, this is probably also the origin of the infamous "breaker bar." That is, when you only have an hour to do something, and unsticking a single nut might take half that time - you just get a bigger wrench (or a dremel, or a nut cracker).
I just looked up your car. Yes - I could see how it could be . . . problematic. If it's the one I am thinking of, it has a German engine. That adds another layer of complexity, since when you get parts, you need to figure out if the parts are the same as the source German engine, or if Ford "modded" them slightly. I had a 1963 Dodge Dart with a heavily modded slant six (custom ground cam, ported, polished, two carbs, etc.). However, other than the mods, it was easy to find engine parts, since the engine was in production for nearly 30 years in various forms and was used in nearly all Mopar marques.
Where it got difficult was finding body parts and suspension parts, etc. . . I recall having at one point a guide that showed me which parts transfer from other cars (like a Plymouth Valiant, etc.). Finally, I figured out a basic rule. The basic rule was that if it's a functional part, it pretty much is the same (especially if it looks the same). If it's a cosmetic part, then it's no go. I used to have a 1967 Ford Mustang. Same thing. I was able to use a lot of parts intended for Mercury Cougars, (suspension, shocks, etc. . .)
That's what I am liking about tube stuff so far - it's seems very similar, in that things are defined more by function. I have already used this concept to do some tube rolling in the amp I have. I figured out how to look up which tubes can replace the ones I have. I'm looking forward to building for that reason. I think I want to design something that has a high tolerance for using different tubes. Once I learn more, I will know what I need to do in order to make that happen!!!