It still has some drag somewhere, the (brushless) motor should spin freely, with nothing more that it's mass keeping it from attaining speed, and rotating freely after you stop the "finger spin"
Hmm. More cleaning may be.
It still has some drag somewhere, the (brushless) motor should spin freely, with nothing more that it's mass keeping it from attaining speed, and rotating freely after you stop the "finger spin"
I'm trying it with the platter removed and just watching the capstan. I'm pretty sure it is an electrolytic but I don't have a schematic. I can turn it with my fingers and it doesn't take much force to turn it. . But I can't spin it even once. I'm not sure how easy this thing is supposed to turn.
No, if it's a .047 mfd 1000V it ISN'T an electrolytic. It's a ceramic disc. Failure rates on those are relatively low but it's still possible, but they don't have the old-age failure mode of an electrolytic. It's too low to be a motor run capacitor, imho. Even if it was shot, the motor should still turn, if you spin it to get it going with your fingers.
HOWEVER, the very first post indictated the motor had frozen up to the point it wouldn't turn, and it took lots of WD-40 to get it to turn freely. That certainly means motor bearings are shot, if they're ball bearings. (Even bronze bushings wouldn't be in great shape but they can be cleaned up somewhat, albeit with greatly increased clearances). Still, even with lousy ball bearings, the motor would likely spin though it would be unusable.
What were the resistance readings across the different windings? And are you sure the coils are connected properly (in parallel), since it's a split-coil motor? The two "positives" should be connected together and the two "negatives" should be together.
The link isn't opening for me. But that value is common for ceramic disc, yet unheard of for an electrolytic.
edit: It *could* also be a polyester film, I found one in the Mouser catalog, a Cornell-Dubilier DME series for less than a buck, but it 's most likely a ceramic...I don't think older polyesters were rated that high but I could be wrong. I've not seen ANY single electrolytics rated that high in audio gear.
edited again: Can you post a pic of the cap and the motor leads?
It still has some drag somewhere, the (brushless) motor should spin freely, with nothing more that it's mass keeping it from attaining speed, and rotating freely after you stop the "finger spin"
I think you nailed it. Took it back apart and relubed. Slowly tightened the nuts while spinning the capstan and voila it works. Thanks a lot. NOw I need to work opn the other small issues.
Glad to hear it's turning!
DexotIT should not be used for AC power switches.
* * * * *
The first thing I would do here is to go to the wires feeding the motor and -- using my AC voltmeter -- see if I had 120 volts AC.
* * * * *
If the capacitor is open, the motor will still turn, though not well. If the capacitor is shorted, it, or something in series with it, will get HOT.
* * * * *
Check the switch that applies power to the motor with an ohmmeter.
* * * * *
Fred
Did you take a look at the capacitor.
I can't open the picture, all I see is the thumbnail with the message.
The speed variation is likely caused by the rubber idler wheel and/or some friction still in the motor. If the rubber idler wheel looks the least bit suspect, send it to Terry's Rubber Idler rebuild (Google it)and he'll rebuild it as good as new. Although I haven't used him--yet--several posters on this forum seem pleased with his work.
Again, if the motor hookup resembles this schematic, this cap's contribution to the motor is essentially nil. It's across the switch. It's not across the motor leads and it's not a run or start capacitor. It's not causing speed variation, IMHO of course. When the switch is made, the motor is running..but the switch has "shorted" (bypassed) the cap so the cap is not even in the circuit. When the switch is open, the cap is there...but the motor's not running then!! The cap is to absorb the inductance from opening and closing the switch.
I can't open the picture, all I see is the thumbnail with the message.
The speed variation is likely caused by the rubber idler wheel and/or some friction still in the motor. If the rubber idler wheel looks the least bit suspect, send it to Terry's Rubber Idler rebuild (Google it)and he'll rebuild it as good as new. Although I haven't used him--yet--several posters on this forum seem pleased with his work.
Again, if the motor hookup resembles this schematic, this cap's contribution to the motor is essentially nil. It's across the switch. It's not across the motor leads and it's not a run or start capacitor. It's not causing speed variation, IMHO of course. When the switch is made, the motor is running..but the switch has "shorted" (bypassed) the cap so the cap is not even in the circuit. When the switch is open, the cap is there...but the motor's not running then!! The cap is to absorb the inductance from opening and closing the switch.