some of the popular jazz copies are easily replaced
I've been comparing some of my original, first release copies of albums against their new pressings and very often prefer the first pressings.
I won't venture to explain why, but my original's often have more impact or "mojo". They just seem to excite me more than the new releases. The new vinyl is almost always quieter, but sounds "flat" compared to my originals.
For example, the other night I ultrasonically cleaned all of my original James Gang albums and compared them against my modern Greatest Hits pressed at QRP. I was disappointed by the new copy, it was quiet and well presented, but it sounded "flat'. If I didn't have the originals, I might not have noticed the difference.
Remaster labels that I have found disappointing include Music On Vinyl and MoFi. They sound "flat" and "thin" and I will avoid them in the future. They're not cheap either...a waste of money and storage space.
I bring this up because I think good sounding vinyl isn't very easily replaced. When I sit down to seriously listen, I listen to vinyl and focus. Otherwise, I'm happy to stream Tidal.
The other concern I have is your choice of turntable. I would remove the platter from any turntable before and during transport and I think the TD-124 is a major hassle compared to something like a Harman Kardon T60. (I only mention the T60 because I have one). The platter comes off of the spindle (without having to remove the spindle), the suspension floats and has locking screws for transport. I'm sure you have something similar and better in your collection.
It may not be ideal, but I like to consider Risk vs. Benefit and arrive at a compromise.
Rich


