• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

Upgrade from my Technics SL-1210M5G to a Linn Sondek?

I still love the Technics, but this is an entirely different level of table.

yeah..a 3 point suspended belt drive in a good state of tune can cure you of upgraditis for quite some time...:D..
try a humble $50 budget cartridge with it just to test Linn's claim that the cartridge is the least important part of the turntable...just for kicks...:scratch2:
 
Originally Posted by thedelihaus
...... instantaneous 33/45 switching.

I got to know - what records are you playing where this is useful or required?

:D

Jblnut

Am I the only one (besides thedelihaus) who thinks that manually moving a freakin' rubber band from one pulley to another to affect a speed change is a royal PITA?

"What records?"

Let's start with every disc made from 1894 through present day. 33 1/3, 45, 78.26 rpm.

All due respect to guys who do nothing but spin LPs, but why should playing records be difficult?

Yes, pushing a button to change speed is a 'must have' feature. As well as variable pitch control. Why not? Why settle for less?
 
Am I the only one (besides thedelihaus) who thinks that manually moving a freakin' rubber band from one pulley to another to affect a speed change is a royal PITA?

"What records?"

Let's start with every disc made from 1894 through present day. 33 1/3, 45, 78.26 rpm.

All due respect to guys who do nothing but spin LPs, but why should playing records be difficult?

Yes, pushing a button to change speed is a 'must have' feature. As well as variable pitch control. Why not? Why settle for less?

I think he means switching speed while the record is playing.
 
I got to know - what records are you playing where this is useful or required?

:D

Jblnut

I think he means switching speed while the record is playing.

Silly boys! I mean going from a 33rpm cut LP to a 45rpm cut LP.

Although, listening to some Spike Jones recordings, your suggested 33/45 during an album could be useful. Same for Bonzo Dog Band, Captain Beefheart, Yoko Ono, The Fugs, John Cale, etc....


Having the occasional "balance" issues suffered from a nasty accident, I prefer to switch the speed of the table with a push of a button vs moving a belt pulley.

No ill will towards those who don't mind moving a belt. It's just easier for me to hit a well-located button.

And as mentioned, another reason I like this instantaneous action is when playing 33rpm LPs and immediately putting on a 45rpm-speed LP- I don't like down-time between records.

I also like the fact some belt drives offer either switch/lever or button 33/45 switching. Handy!


Congrats on the Linn- and glad you found happiness with it. Nice table.:thmbsp:

Anthony- did you ever modify the M5G, or did you keep it fully stock?
 
Last edited:
Silly boys! I mean going from a 33rpm cut LP to a 45rpm cut LP.

Although, listening to some Spike Jones recordings, your suggested 33/45 during an album could be useful. Same for Bonzo Dog Band, Captain Beefheart, Yoko Ono, The Fugs, John Cale, etc....


Having the occasional "balance" issues suffered from a nasty accident, I prefer to switch the speed of the table with a push of a button vs moving a belt pulley.

No ill will towards those who don't mind moving a belt. It's just easier for me to hit a well-located button.

And as mentioned, another reason I like this instantaneous action is when playing 33rpm LPs and immediately putting on a 45rpm-speed LP- I don't like down-time between records.

I also like the fact some belt drives offer either switch/lever or button 33/45 switching. Handy!


Congrats on the Linn- and glad you found happiness with it. Nice table.:thmbsp:

Anthony- did you ever modify the M5G, or did you keep it fully stock?

Kept it fully stock.
 
I have plenty EP's with one 33 and one 45 side..

Wouldn't have stopped me buying the Linn in the OP's situation btw, but I'd have also kept the Technics until the Linn was up and running.

I'm using an SL1200MKII until one of my Lenco's is done btw.
 
You could always get two Linns. Have one with the belt always on 45 and the other with the belt on 33. See- no down time.
 
Ok. I went with the Linn; but I'm selling the Technics to a close friend so it won't be far away.

Once I got the Linn setup and running, it wasn't even close imho. :no:

it seems to me that you reached the same conclusion that a lot of people did when the Linn came out in the 1970's.
 
You could always get two Linns. Have one with the belt always on 45 and the other with the belt on 33. See- no down time.

good point!:yes::thmbsp:

I do think my occasional imbalance and sudden "plop!" as I tip over still suits a non-sprung style table, however.

Let me stop by and play around with that lusty VPI classic you have...:yes::D
 
Why Would You Assume....

I'm surprised - I'm sure there was something holding the M5G back.

that there was anything wrong with the 1200, or its set up? It shouldn't be a surprise that these machine sound different, as they are significantly different in terms of architecture....both arm and table. Apparently the OP prefers the sound of the Linn over the Technics. Actually it appears that he says the Linn performs better.

The Technics 1200 is supposed to be close to a plug and play table. Set the cartridge up, make sure the table is level and on a solid base. Thats what Technics fans say all that needs to be done to it, so I doubt the 1200 in this comparison was set up poorly. Since its ruggedly built, I also doubt that it would have mechanical issues that would compromise its performance. So what do you suppose could have been holding it back?

Man, I thought LP12 owners were arrogant and condescending back in the 80's. But they did have arguably one of the finest tables being produced. The Technics 1200 fan club is just as bad, maybe even worse. I find it interesting that you don't give the OP a congrats for finding a table that he appreciates, but in effect deny the 2nd place finish of the 1200 in this comparison. Sheesh.

Heck I own a Technics SP25 drive unit that I need to build a plinth for. I had planned on listening to it to hear what a Technics DD table has to offer. But I am getting tired of attitude that the 1200 fan club carries around. I have half a mind to build the plinth and toss the thing up for sale straight away. I am getting to the point where I don't want to be associated with Technics owners at all. Course this is just the opinion of a simple barnyard animal.

Marnatzfan: The first table I fell in love with was a LP12/Ittok/Trioka combination. Amanda Bloon sound so enchanting on this set up! I stopped in at the store to hear it whenever I could, but I could never afford it as a college student. I still have half a mind to buy one and see what I think about it these days. Congratulations on a fine table, I would think you will have many a satisfying listening session on that table.

Regards
Mister Pig
 
...Man, I thought LP12 owners were arrogant and condescending back in the 80's. But they did have arguably one of the finest tables being produced. The Technics 1200 fan club is just as bad, maybe even worse....I am getting to the point where I don't want to be associated with Technics owners at all. Course this is just the opinion of a simple barnyard animal....

John, with utmost respect, there was equal bias from both camps here.



Re: Linn

No surprise really. So, what are you running for arm + cart? Your original post says Sumiko, but your tag line says Akito + 2M Black.

jeff

it seems to me that you reached the same conclusion that a lot of people did when the Linn came out in the 1970's.

RE: Technics

I'm surprised - I'm sure there was something holding the M5G back.





I do agree with you sometimes the different camps can get very militant, but this has remained pretty civil, in my opinion. And both camps are equally valid here, as well as staunch supporters of whichever brand they favor.



I do stand strongly by my posts here-

Congrats!

It's a shame you can't keep both. I know I couldn't part with either if they were mine.

If you can get that Linn dialed in, I feel it's going to be a better sounding table than your stock M5G. The M5G would need modding to compete.

and

I'd invest in modding the knickers off the Technics- bearing, PSU, Isnoe footers, copper platter mat, etc.

Hunt down an SME IV or V as well.

Why?

I like the way the 1200 operates. I love the VTA on the fly, the instant start, and immediate stop of the platter, the que light that pops up, the resilience to foot-fall, instantaneous 33/45 switching.

That said, a Linn is perhaps the nicest of the 3-point suspension design. And some argue the magic is especially in the fine tonearm design.

Would you mind the extra effort and time in setting up the Linn, and subsequent maintenance?

Are your floors impervious to foot-falls?

The Linn can reward you with glorious sound but it is, compared to the Technics, high maintenance.



I still think in stock form, the Linn is the better table in regards to sound.

In the same breath, I can also support the folk who opt to hot-rod the Technics SL-1200MK2, or in my case, the SP25, and get incredibly impressive performance.


In reality, you end up spending equal amounts of cash on either the stock or mildly modified Linn, and quite modified Technics. Each deck has the potential of reaching lofty goals- the Linn is closer to this goal from the get-go in stock form,, but does require more fine tuning and general maintenance and fuss- the Technics is good from the start, but heavy massaging the stocker is needed to bring out it's potential. The end result can be a great table that also offers low maintenance and fuss.



The same thing applies to the other fanboy table- the Rega.


And again, the Regas offer something special-from an impressive stock P5 or P7 or P9, to the basic p2 and 3 and RB-250 and RB-300 that respond fantastically to heavy mods. I'd be a liar if I said I didn't find the Origin Live arms to be lusty, beautiful beasts.



The thing is, all three table manufacturers- Technics, Rega, Linn- and legions of others, from Systemdek, Ariston, Thorens, vintage Sony, Yamaha, JVC, and Sota, ClearAudio, VPI- all are capable of impressive performance, and careful selection of the model, research into any achilles heels, the severity of these, and how to address them properly will yield positive results.


What gets me down? Any vehement fanaticism ANY brand carries, and any negative attitudes this carries with it, and slander towards other brands.

This carries over into the whole east coast-west coast speaker argument, tube vs. solid state, belt vs direct drive, MM vs MC vs MI, unipivot vs knife edge vs traditional bearing, cd vs lp, and so on.

This always leaves me baffled and dumbfounded, as I can say, with honesty, I've heard good, even great examples from almost every camp.

It also echoes arguments about Red sox vs yankees, Kansas City vs Memphis vs carolina vs Texas BBQ, Chevy vs Ford vs Mopar.


I've never turned down good BBQ, despite whatever region it's come from and in my teenage years, I've owned Chevy, Ford and Mopar musclecars and loved every tire smokin', street racin', drive-in-back-seat-action moment of all three.


With the above stated, I mean no disrespect to any poster quoted- I see,hear, and understand your positions, and comprehend them fully.


and once again for the record, I am not surprised the Linn edged out a stock M5g- I think highly of the M5G, but feel modification is needed to really make the table reach lofty potential.

And also for the record, I am pleased as punch that Anthony has found nirvana with the Linn- a fantastic table and great arm.


I am still pleased I opted for my needs the modified Technics SP25 equipped with EPA 100 and 250 arms and embrace both the sound and general aesthetics and ease of use, and I don't second guess my investment (substantial) or choice (wise, in regards to my needs and end result/product).
 
Well I can say with somewhat unbiased opinion that after having heard Both of Anthony`s TT`s in some Very good setups I was pleasently suprised and amazed at the Quality and depth of sound from the LP-12 with the Akito arm and the Ortofon 2M Black cart. This being said the M5G with the Benz Siver was No slouch. Can`t wait to hear it with the Altec 19`s!
 
I've yet to hear a bad word about the Ortofon 2M Black. Praise follows this cart, even from some dyed-in-the-wool LOMC fans.

The Akito- besides some issues with earlier Akito 1 models and bearing issues that crop up with this specific early version, this arm (especially later versions) is very well regarded in many an audio circle ant that arm, too, has avoided any negative remarks among many folk of whom I hold in high regard, esteem and respect.

I'm actually surprised the Akito doesn't get more press and praise in the internet audio circle.

I've even heard a few folk staunchly argue the magic with the Linn was in the arm (Akito and above), the table being good too, but credit due more-so in regards to the tone arm.

I still think it's a balance of a very good approach to a suspended plinth/deck design and quality executed arm.


I won't knock the Basik arm- but among some, it's a lackluster effort by Linn to hit a targeted price point.

I think that's a tad harsh, but at the same time I'd consider a Rega RB or Jelco arm before a Basik.
 
I've yet to hear a bad word about the Ortofon 2M Black. Praise follows this cart, even from some dyed-in-the-wool LOMC fans.

The Akito- besides some issues with earlier Akito 1 models and bearing issues that crop up with this specific early version, this arm (especially later versions) is very well regarded in many an audio circle ant that arm, too, has avoided any negative remarks among many folk of whom I hold in high regard, esteem and respect.

I'm actually surprised the Akito doesn't get more press and praise in the internet audio circle.

I've even heard a few folk staunchly argue the magic with the Linn was in the arm (Akito and above), the table being good too, but credit due more-so in regards to the tone arm.

I still think it's a balance of a very good approach to a suspended plinth/deck design and quality executed arm.


I won't knock the Basik arm- but among some, it's a lackluster effort by Linn to hit a targeted price point.

I think that's a tad harsh, but at the same time I'd consider a Rega RB or Jelco arm before a Basik.

Sorry Paul,

If the magic was in the Linn arm, I'd have kept the Ittok. I chose the Naim Aro instead of the Ekos. I heard the Linn magic people refer to way back when it had a Grace 707 tone arm. That basic LP-12/Grace 707/Supex combo was something else. That triggered a 20 year search for a Linn that I could afford.

The magic of the Linn is in its set-up and proper installation on a light and rigid platform, the Mana (sadly discontinued) being a good example.

What applies for the Linn's magic could also happen with different brand decks if they were set-up correctly and installed on a rack/stand that they were meant for, whether they be massive or light.

Personal preferences come into play as we may not perceive music in the same way as others do. What I might find enjoyable, some may find boring.

I also own an SL-1700 and I appreciate it for what it is. Technics decks have withstood the test of time and offer solid performance at a very affordable price. It also doesn't come close to what my Linn deck actually cost me. I love them both for what they offer. They're two good brands.

As far as camps are concerned, it doesn't matter to me. All decks need to be fine tuned patiently to get the most out of them. In the end, they can all be high maintenance to reach the level of performance they are capable of.
 
Heck I own a Technics SP25 drive unit that I need to build a plinth for. I had planned on listening to it to hear what a Technics DD table has to offer. But I am getting tired of attitude that the 1200 fan club carries around. I have half a mind to build the plinth and toss the thing up for sale straight away. I am getting to the point where I don't want to be associated with Technics owners at all. Course this is just the opinion of a simple barnyard animal.

Whoa, you're serious on this?
A bit shocked here, equimpents virtues are someting else than owners' opinions aren't they?
Or; Why care what the pork eaters say? ;)
 
Last edited:
First- thank you for an excellent post. :yes::thmbsp:

Sorry Paul,

If the magic was in the Linn arm, I'd have kept the Ittok. I chose the Naim Aro instead of the Ekos. I heard the Linn magic people refer to way back when it had a Grace 707 tone arm. That basic LP-12/Grace 707/Supex combo was something else. That triggered a 20 year search for a Linn that I could afford.....

Thank you for another look from another angle, re: the arm. Again, great, informative post and I agree-

I do think the table itself is of an excellent basic design- more on that shortly- I really wasn't clear on my point though.

While the basic table design is of smart pedigree and fine tuned to further finesse, I believe the pundits were saying that other companies were also executing the same basic deck- but I glossed over the fact that the Linn tables did refine, tune and finesse the most from the design.

So I do agree with your point here.

What I should have said about the arm is, the better offerings from Linn were exceptionally well executed and real works of industrial art. A true premium icing on a refined cake.:yes:

And what the pundits were saying is the table itself is a simple basic design of good pedigree and smart execution, but shared with others, just a more refined execution- but agreed the upper end Linn arms were superior to what the AR XA offered, or what the Systemdek and Ariston came with in stock form.


...The magic of the Linn is in its set-up and proper installation on a light and rigid platform, the Mana (sadly discontinued) being a good example.

What applies for the Linn's magic could also happen with different brand decks if they were set-up correctly and installed on a rack/stand that they were meant for, whether they be massive or light...


I think the basic Linn design has a LOT going for it. This is why the humble AR XA holds up so well, and the Systemdek and Ariston decks. All of these, and the Linn, start with a successful basic design that's just "right".

And why all these are all "tweakable" to eek out more performance.

...I also own an SL-1700 and I appreciate it for what it is...

Indeed. To tout it as equal to the Linn would be a disservice to the audio community and in my opinion, dishonest. I use mine in a bedroom setting, for ease of use, and worry-free performance. It offers very good sound in stock form, and I've avoided modding it, despite the possibility of squeezing better sound from it. Perhaps one day. The mods still will not make it a Linn, but will up the ante, and the deck has no need to hang it's head in shame.

...As far as camps are concerned, it doesn't matter to me. All decks need to be fine tuned patiently to get the most out of them. In the end, they can all be high maintenance to reach the level of performance they are capable of.


Very true. And one needs to be aware even with fine tuning, maintenance and modifications, at some point you do hit the limitations of the deck.

The stock SL1200MK2 and M5G models with the stock arm can be modded for a paltry $50 and sound notably better. But the 1200s that are really competing with the upper-echeleon decks are the ones modded to the tune of $2,500, with aftermarket power supply, bearing, platter mat, and sporting a modern SME 309 arm.

At $2500, there's some lofty competition from Rega, Sota, Linn, VPI- even Yamaha's GT-2000 or Technics' own SP-10MK2 and MK3 decks.

These things need to be kept in perspective.:yes:
 
Back
Top Bottom