I've looked at the paint pad and my Nitty Gritty brush and it appears under 5x magnification that the paint pad may actually have finer bristles than the Nitty Gritty. They certainly seem to have more split ends in them than the Nitty Gritty, which appears to be solid strands.
As far as the "aggressive bristles" vs "soft nap" is concerned; I think that's a strawman. Any of these brushes with natural bristle or plastic fibers are orders of magnitudes softer, more pliable, and gentler to your LPs than the diamond tipped stylus of your cartridge. If you have no issues with the stylus passing through the groove, you certainly shouldn't be concerned about any damage from a paint pad :yes:
Hello Andyman,
I'd like to kindly disagree, that this is a flawed analogy.
While basically everything else is less hard than a Diamond Stylus, not so for the Vinyl itself. Ever wonder when examining thrift shop vinyl, just how in the heck they got so scratched? Probably most could be attributed to improper handling in, and out of the Jacket, placed on Record Changers, where the vinyl rubs-contacts one another with a damaging slurry of dirt-dust in between.
With this analogy, then everything else would be non-damaging to vinyl, since a diamond is harder in all cases. Here's a few examples which are softer than the Diamond, but I know no sane person who would use them. Wire Brush, Scotchbrite Scrub Pad, Sandpaper.
I've seen some Paint Pads, (usually the very small ones which have foam backing) that seem to be softer than the hard plastic backed versions, but perhaps are made of the exact same material?
Would you then say the Paint Pad material is less abrasive, or possibly damaging than a Discwasher? I'm sure multitudes still use these, but those more knowledageable have dropped these a long time ago for better products available.
Some of the brushes supplied with RCM's, such as my VPI 16.5 are Nylon, and there's probably good reason for this, as natural hair has a tendency to disintegrate when being used with certain cleaners, typically Enzyme Based. Most I've talked with say, and I agree, they are fine for spreading fluids evenly on a records surface (Such as a first step Enzyme Based Cleaner), but still aren't the ideal brush IMO due to still not quite as efficient at getting to the grooves themselves.
I believe the actual manufacturer who makes the material for these Scrub Pads is 3M. It would interesting if some hard data could be found to better describe.
I can understand perhaps one wishing to find a suitable, acceptable, easily gotten substitute, but with so many well established vendors carrying better products today, it's not that big of a problem.
My earlier post, with the suggestion of just buying a pair of Mo-Fi Pad replacements, and one making thier own Pad Holder sounds simple enough, and certainly wouldn't break anyone's bank at a cost of $4.95 plus shipping.
The pads are pretty durable, the ones I have (4), have probably scrubbed a good 200 LPs so far with 4-step AIVS Cleaners, and appear to have no need to be changed-swapped out as of yet.
Please understand that I'm not trying to impose my will upon you, or others, just wishing to make a very good sound recommendation, and I'm sure once you would try these, I think you would better understand my logic, which I feel is certainly not a strawman recommendation. I very much doubt you'd be wishing to return back to Paint Pads for your scrubbing routine.
It would be a nice feeling seeing you (and others) come back into the group a few weeks from now saying "hey mark, thank you, you were right, I do like these Pads better, they seem to do a better job, and my records are now playing quieter, with better sound". Mark