• The move to the new server is done. There are some software and database maintenance updates in process. This has us passing the hat around to help out. We appreciate any donations. Seriously, even a dollar helps. The payment page may be found here - https://www.audiokarma.org/support.html

What is "Air around Instruments"

I would describe it this way:
When I listen to a string quartet, and it sounds like it was recorded live, and I hear the sound of each instrument and it's reflection off the space around it, rather than each instrument seeming to emanate from dead air, with no reflections, as if it was a multi - mic recording. It gives the impression, as has been said here, of "being there" or of the musicians being in your listening space.
 
Haven't the slightest idea, really. I generally find these vague, kinda made-up descriptive words to be pretty much useless, but then that's just my opinion... Buttery and airy as adjectives sound more like they belong in a dessert cookbook than anywhere else.
 
Haven't the slightest idea, really. I generally find these vague, kinda made-up descriptive words to be pretty much useless, but then that's just my opinion... Buttery and airy as adjectives sound more like they belong in a dessert cookbook than anywhere else.

Perhaps rightly so, but sometimes one needs to connect through metaphors and images.
 
Ok, but I want to know what the music sounds like, not the coloration the freaking equipment adds. It should sound like nothing! "Buttery", Air", "Tight", "Open", who cares. Are you listening to the music or the equipment, tell me what matters to you and I will tell you who the true audiophile is.
Thank you.
Rant over.
Forgive me.
 
Another attempt by audiophleas to describe something that's better to experience than talk about. Back about 10 or so years ago when I first started paying attention to audio talk on the interwebs, seemed like every other description of the sound quality of high frequencies of speakers used the term "buttery." I could never figure out why anyone would want their speakers to have any semblance to dairy products.


:lmao:


Excellent ...thanks.....

But I did not realize our heads were filled with so much BS.....


jk

:lmao::lmao:


I thought I knew what it meant until I read this thread, now I'm not so sure.
 
Ok, but I want to know what the music sounds like, not the coloration the freaking equipment adds. It should sound like nothing! "Buttery", Air", "Tight", "Open", who cares. Are you listening to the music or the equipment, tell me what matters to you and I will tell you who the true audiophile is.
Thank you.
Rant over.
Forgive me.
last i knew, most musical instruments could be played in air but not butter.
so, 'airy' works for me.:music:
 
Ok, but I want to know what the music sounds like, not the coloration the freaking equipment adds. It should sound like nothing! "Buttery", Air", "Tight", "Open", who cares. Are you listening to the music or the equipment, tell me what matters to you and I will tell you who the true audiophile is.
Thank you.
Rant over.
Forgive me.

Um, I want it to sound like the musicians are there in front of me, playing. I want it to sound real, not realistic.
 
to me the " air " is the space in which instruments and vocalist appear as if
in their own physical space in the musical soundstage..even perhaps "floating" somewhere from somewhat left to in between to somewhere right of speakers and from back to front of these. Depending on the recording. :music:

kind of like angel food cake plenty of air or
angel food cake all mushed up in a ball .. no air :banana:

or soda that has gone flat :boring:

maybe even like a flat tire :scratch2:

Oh well it's just for the fun it all :thmbsp:
 
I think you pretty much nailed it Redboy. I'll add anyone that can hear the difference between live and reproduced music can hear what's called "air".
 
Haven't the slightest idea, really. I generally find these vague, kinda made-up descriptive words to be pretty much useless, but then that's just my opinion... Buttery and airy as adjectives sound more like they belong in a dessert cookbook than anywhere else.
They are not useless when two or more people share the experiece they describe, The they become like all other words; tools that point to experiences or objects.
When I say "green", without a shared understanding of what that means, it is a totally useless word. But we all have some concept of what green means, so we can utilize it when we communicate.

I think there have been some good descriptions offered here already. So you might get a better sense of what we're talking about our perceptions with words like like "air" or "bloom".
 
I suck at describing what I'm hearing so I usually try not to get too deep into it. However, I've always assumed that "air" to be a certain clarity or definition that allows you to hear the individual instruments distinctly, without everything being muddled together.

That said, music in a vacuum never appealed much to me.
This is an excellent description.
But I think instruments can be well spaced within the soundsatge and still have more or less air around them. Air to me also implies that the instruments have plenty of space to breathe. Time and space for their timbres to be fully realized. That's to say that an instrument can stand freely in its space in the soundstage and still sound a bit compressed or thin unto it self.
(I'll bet I just lost a few people there:))
 
I think you pretty much nailed it Redboy. I'll add anyone that can hear the difference between live and reproduced music can hear what's called "air".

I understand that I should be able to hear "what's called "air"" since I can here the difference between live and reproduced music.

My question isn't whether I can hear it. My question is what sound qualities are assigned to the term.

Accusations of having a tin ear are gleefully ignored.................
 
Air around the instruments in my mind means you can hear the room as part of the sound stage, the decay of the note, the tone of the drum head, the ambiance as it were of the ..................? what was the question?
 
I understand that I should be able to hear "what's called "air"" since I can here the difference between live and reproduced music.

My question isn't whether I can hear it. My question is what sound qualities are assigned to the term.

Accusations of having a tin ear are gleefully ignored.................
my relatively 'new-to-me' pioneer qa800a amp produces music with an 'airy' sound, imo. it's still running strong, jeff.

thanks, again!:music:
 
my relatively 'new-to-me' pioneer qa800a amp produces music with an 'airy' sound, imo. it's still running strong, jeff.

thanks, again!:music:

Hey, I forgot about that amp. I could use it about now, too.

I'm glad you are enjoying it and it's running well.
 
I understand that I should be able to hear "what's called "air"" since I can here the difference between live and reproduced music.

My question isn't whether I can hear it. My question is what sound qualities are assigned to the term.

Accusations of having a tin ear are gleefully ignored.................

I think the guys here have done a pretty good job with many examples of "air" but I'll give it a try.

"Air" is far more easily heard on very good stero systems and once heard "air" becomes instantly recognizeable. The easiest way to experience it without spending a lot is to go to your local hi-end dealer and ask them to demonstrate "air".

Maybe not the best, but an extreme example is listening to a cheap record player. Fidelity issues aside, the individual musicians and their instruments are mixed and "muddled" together with absolutely no "air" around them. On a very good stereo, the musicians, their instruments and the ambient sounds of the stage remain clearly focused as reproduced from the original recording. The "air" is preserved and you can hear into the performance that there is space on the stage, between the musicians, the instruments and notes played remain seperate and indentifiable and don't "muddle" together as more than one instrument is played. Hope that helps.
 
I suck at describing what I'm hearing so I usually try not to get too deep into it. However, I've always assumed that "air" to be a certain clarity or definition that allows you to hear the individual instruments distinctly, without everything being muddled together.

That said, music in a vacuum never appealed much to me.

I resemble the first part of your statement (I suck at describing what I'm hearing).:D
 
Back
Top Bottom