The thoughts about the time issue or temporal of recording are interesting. I have noticed that current recordings tend to have an absence of nature, such as the simpatico of the musician' creative act is missing because they are not there recording in person at the same time. What one creative musician does in isolated form any other creative musician, they don't humanistically interact.
Some of the instruments are not making sounds that really existed in space-time until play by the reproduction system, that is the are not reproduced mixing with other natural sounds in the air but are captured electronically, not aurally.
The soundscape sucks, that is there isn't any, because the spacial quality of multi-microphone recording provides additional phase based differences that create space. The sterile sound in the closed 'mic'ed, non stereo, reproductive process can not be covered by reverb alone.
I spent years recording music and I always asked the musicians before the session where they imagined this song was played, was it in a closet, smoke-filled bar, concert hall? What was the presentation space? This that knowledge I could figure out what the group felt it's listener should feel when listening,and as the engineer it was my job to craft that space. My job as a circuit designer now is to understand the the interactions between the dynamic elements of the music reproduction system, far more challenging than the recording side of the equation.
Recorded music when played back should be a cathartic experience, when it is, it is profound and mind boggling, truly a gift from the past, that is when it is a time machine. But mediocre recording practices and over production obliterate those feeling. The best recording I have ever hear were done with two microphones in intimated environments, designing circuits to harvest this rare sources from the past are the highest execution of the audio art.